用户名: 密码: 验证码:
科研社交网络中用户学术社交不足的前置动因探究——质性研究的视角
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Exploring the Former Motivation of User's Academic Social Insufficiency in the Scientific Social Network——A Qualitative Study
  • 作者:李晶 ; 张帅 ; 王文韬
  • 英文作者:Li Jing;Zhang Shuai;Wang Wentao;School of Management,Anhui University;
  • 关键词:科研社交网络 ; 社交行为 ; 驱动因素 ; 质性研究
  • 英文关键词:scientific social network;;social behavior;;driving factors;;qualitative research
  • 中文刊名:XDQB
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Modern Information
  • 机构:安徽大学管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-01
  • 出版单位:现代情报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39;No.332
  • 基金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“基于社交媒体的学术交流行为模式及优化策略研究”(项目编号:17CTQ028)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XDQB201902015
  • 页数:8
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:22-1182/G3
  • 分类号:123-129+146
摘要
科研社交网络在我国的应用正日益广泛,文章探究科研社交网络中用户学术社交不足的前置动因,以小木虫为数据收集场所,通过半结构化访谈法深入访谈12名用户,运用NVivo质性分析软件对访谈原始数据进行分析,归纳出13个主范畴并聚焦为4个核心范畴,分别是个体意向因素、平台客观条件、信息因素和学术交流特性,在此基础上提出优化用户学术社交行为和改善科研社交网络学术社交功能的建议和对策。
        The application of Scientific Social Network is more and more popular in our country. This paper explored the former motivation of user academic social insufficiency in the scientific social network. This paper focuses on MuChong forum and collected data on the academic social activities of 12 users,using the NVivo 11 qualitative analysis software to analyze the original data of the interview,and summarized the 13 subcategories that affected the academic social insufficiency of the scientific social network users and focused on the data for the 4 main areas,including the individual intention factor,the platform objective condition,the information factor and the academic social characteristic. The paper provided some theoretical guidance and reference for optimizing the academic social behavior and improving the academic social function of the scientific social network.
引文
[1]Thelwall M,Kousha K.Academia.edu:Social Network or Academic Network?[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2015,65(4):721-731.
    [2]赵杨,李露琪.国内外学术社交网站研究现状述评与思考[J].情报资料工作,2016,(6):41-47.
    [3]ResearchGate.Recruiting[EB/OL].https://solutions.researchgate.net/recruiting,2018-03-18.
    [4]We're Hiring[EB/OL].http://muchong.com,2018-03-18.
    [5]Gruzd A,Goertzen M.Wired Academia:Why Social Science Scholars are Using Social Media[C]//2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on Sstem Sciences(HICSS).Washington,DC:IEEE,2013:3332-3341.
    [6]Chakraborty N.Activities and Reasons for Using Social Networking Sites by Research Scholars in NEHU:A Study on Facebook and ResearchGate[J].Inflibnet Centre,2012,5(3):19-27.
    [7]Jeng W,He D,Jiang J.User Participation in an Academic Social Networking Service:A Survey of Open Group Users on Mendeley[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2015,66(5):890-904.
    [8]Ma M,Agarwal R.Through a Glass Darkly:Information Technology Design,Identity Verification,and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities[J].Information Systems Research,2007,18(1):42-67.
    [9]张晓娟,周学春.社区治理策略、用户就绪和知识贡献研究:以百度百科虚拟社区为例[J].管理评论,2016,28(9):72-82.
    [10]李晓方.激励设计与知识共享---百度内容开放平台知识共享制度研究[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):272-278.
    [11]胡蓉.学术社交网站用户分析方法的研究及应用[D].广州:华南师范大学,2015.
    [12]Gruzd A,Staves K,Wilk A.Connected Scholars:Examining the Role of Social Media in Research Practices of Faculty Using the UTAUT Model[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2012,28(6):2340-2350.
    [13]Chen C H,Desarmo J,Ke H R.Exploring Reasons for Use or Non-use of Academic Social Network Services Among Taiwanese Fishery Scientists[J].Journal of Library&Information Science Research,2016,11(1):85-105.
    [14]李晶,卢小莉,李卓卓.学术社区信息质量感知形成机理研究[J].图书馆学研究,2017,(1):6-9.
    [15]刘晓娟,刘新哲.虚拟学术群组特征研究---以用户为分析视角[J].图书情报工作,2015,(24):83-92.
    [16]Hoffmann C P,Luts C,Meckel M.A Relational Altmetric?Network Centrality on Research Gate as an Indicator of Scientific Impact[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2015,67(4):1-11.
    [17]Ortega J L.Disciplinary Differences in the Use of Academic Social Networking Sites[J].Online Information Review,2015,39(4):520-536.
    [18]Collins K,Shiffman D,Rock J.How are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace?[J].PloS one,2016,11(10):e0162680.
    [19]屈宝强.网络学术论坛中的科研合作行为及其反思---以“小木虫”学术论坛为例[J].科技管理研究,2010,30(10):215-218.
    [20]凯西·卡麦兹.建构扎根理论[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009:1-3.
    [21]Bazeley P.Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo[M].London:SAGE Publications,2007:82-83.
    [22]邹儒楠,于建荣.数字时代非正式学术交流特点的社会网络分析---以小木虫生命科学论坛为例[J].情报科学,2015,(7):81-86.
    [23]张帅,王文韬,李晶.用户在线知识付费行为影响因素研究[J].图书情报工作,2017,(10):94-100.
    [24]Guest G,Bunce A,Johnson L.How Many Interviews are E-nough?An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability[J].Field Methods,2006,18(1):59-82.
    [25]Strauss A,Corbin J M.Basics of Qualitative Research:Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques[J].Modern Language Journal,1990,77(2):129.
    [26]Barbour J B,Rintamaki L S,Ramsey J A,et al.Avoiding Health Information[J].Journal of Health Communication,2012,17(2):212-229.
    [27]薛调,刘云,刘彦庆.高校图书馆嵌入式教学实施的影响因素研究[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(15):83-87.
    [28]Francis J J,Johnston M,Robertson C,et al.What is an Adequate Sample Size?Operationalising Data Saturation for Theorybased Interview Studies[J].Psychology and Health,2010,25(10):1229-1245.
    [29]Thelwall M,Kousha K.Research Gate:Disseminating,Communicating,and Measuring Scholarship?[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2015,66(5):876-889.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700