骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉固定L_1压缩性骨折:与单纯椎弓根螺钉固定的比较
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Pedicle screw fixation with bone cement versus pedicle screw fixation alone for L_1 compression fractures
  • 作者:亚力坤·亚森
  • 英文作者:Yalikun·Yasen;Department of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University;
  • 关键词:脊柱骨折 ; 腰椎 ; 骨钉 ; 椎体成形术 ; 骨科植入物 ; 脊柱植入物 ; 椎弓根 ; 螺钉 ; 骨水泥 ; Cobb角 ; 伤椎椎体前缘高度
  • 英文关键词:,Spinal Fractures;Lumbar Vertebrae;Bone Nails;Vertebroplasty
  • 中文刊名:XDKF
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
  • 机构:新疆医科大学第二附属医院骨科;
  • 出版日期:2015-09-24
  • 出版单位:中国组织工程研究
  • 年:2015
  • 期:v.19;No.718
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XDKF201539015
  • 页数:6
  • CN:39
  • ISSN:21-1581/R
  • 分类号:70-75
摘要
背景:椎体成形术与椎弓根螺钉内固定都是胸腰椎骨折的有效修复方案,但胸腰椎压缩性骨折内固定取出后脊柱角度丢失是较为常见的并发症,经皮椎体成形术可能是预防脊柱角度丢失的较好选择。目的:观察骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉置入内固定修复L1压缩性骨折的临床疗效及并发症,并与单纯椎弓根螺钉内固定比较。方法:纳入L1压缩性骨折患者76例,根据内固定修复方案分为两组,经皮椎体成形组40例行骨水泥联合椎弓根螺钉置入内固定治疗,单纯椎弓根内固定组36例仅行椎弓根螺钉置入内固定治疗。比较两组的修复效果,置入后即刻、置入后3,6个月以伤椎为中心进行MRI检查测量Cobb角、伤椎椎体前缘高度,同时记录目测类比评分;另外了解有无内固定松动断裂。结果与结论:两组患者随访6个月内均获骨性愈合,无螺钉松动、折断。两组置入后6个月损伤节段后凸Cobb角、伤椎椎体前缘高度均较置入前明显改善(P<0.01),椎体成形组要优于单纯椎弓根内固定组(P<0.05)。两组置入后6个月目测类比评分较置入前明显改善(P<0.01),但两组差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。表明应用骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉内固定及椎弓根钉内固定修复L1压缩性均可获得满意复位,重建椎体高度。但抗压稳定性结果表明应用骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉内固定的固定效果更好一些,未见短期断钉、矫正丢失等并发症,椎体骨水泥灌注可提高椎弓根螺钉置入后的稳定性。
        BACKGROUND: Vertebroplasty and edicle screw fixation are effective repair methods for thoracolumbar fractures. Spine angle loss is a more common complication after removal of implant for thoracolumbar compression fractures. Percutaneous vertebroplasty may be a better choice for preventing spine angle loss. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical curative effect and complication of pedicle screw fixation with bone cement for repair of L1 compression fractures, and to compare with pedicle screw fixation alone. METHODS: A total of 76 cases of L1 compression fractures were enrolled and assigned to two groups according to fixation repair method. 40 patients in the vertebroplasty group received bone cement and pedicle screw fixation.36 patients in the pedicle screw fixation group received pedicle screw fixation alone. Repair effects were compared between the two groups. MRI examination was conducted immediately, 3 and 6 months after surgery taking injured vertebral body as a center to measure Cobb angle and the height of anterior border of the injured vertebral body. Simultaneously, visual analogue scale score was recorded. Loosing and breakage of the fixator were seen. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Bone union was detected within 6 months of follow-up in the two groups, no screw loosing or breakage. Kyphosis Cobb angle and the height of anterior border of the vertebral body were significantly improved at 6 months after surgery in both groups(P < 0.01). Above indexes were better in the vertebroplasty group than in the pedicle screw fixation group(P < 0.05). Visual analogue scale score was significantly improved at 6 months post surgery in both groups(P < 0.01), but no significant difference was found between the two groups(P > 0.05). These findings suggested that pedicle screw fixation with bone cement and pedicle screw fixation alone for L1 compression fracture obtained satisfactory reduction, and reconstructed the height of the vertebral body. However, results of compressive stability indicated that the fixation effect of pedicle screw fixation with bone cement was better than that of pedicle screw fixation alone. No short-term screw breakage and correction loss occurred. Perfusion with bone cement could elevate the stability of pedicle screw implantation.
引文
[1]胡家美,徐新华,乐敏莉,等.内固定联合椎体成形术对脊柱骨折患者Frankel分级、Cobb角及椎管侵占情况的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,8(33):134-136.
    [2]沈晓龙,张海龙,顾昕,等.微创经椎间孔椎间融合术联合单、双侧内固定治疗单间隙腰椎退变性疾病[J].中华骨科杂志,2014,34(7):749-755.
    [3]Rodríguez-Vela J,Lobo-Escolar A,Joven E,et al.Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3-to4-year followup.Eur Spine J.2013;22(12):2857-2863.
    [4]Uchida K,Nakajima H,Yayama T,et al.Vertebroplastyaugmented short-segment posterior fixation of osteoporotic vertebral collapse with neurological deficit in the thoracolumbar spine:comparisons with posterior surgery without vertebroplasty and anterior surgery.J Neurosurg Spine.2010;13(5):612-621.
    [5]Reinhold M,Knop C,Beisse R,et al.Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thorax and lumbar spine.Part II:surgical treatment and radiological findings.Unfallchirurg.2009;112(2):149-167.
    [6]王生介,谭红略,赵金坤,等.椎弓根螺钉固定结合硫酸钙椎体成形术治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折的生物力学研究[J].临床骨科杂志,2010,13(1):80-83.
    [7]吴云刚,石志才,张晔,等.骨水泥强化椎体提高椎弓根螺钉置入后的稳定性[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2010,14(42):7951-7954.
    [8]岳文峰,夏虹,王建华.骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉固定对骨质疏松患者有利无弊?[J].中国组织工程研究,2013,17(17):3081-3088.
    [9]凌钦杰,何二兴.椎体成形术防治渗漏的研究进展[J].广东医学,2014,35(9):1450-1454.
    [10]Rodrigues CP,Ribeiro SM,Neves N,et al.Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the treatment of post traumatic kyphosis following an osteoporotic fracture of the thoracolumbar spine.Acta Reumatol Port.2011;36(2):184-186.
    [11]Josten C,Schmidt C,Spiegl U.Osteoporotic vertebral body fractures of the thoracolumbar spine:diagnostics and thera peutic strategies.Chirurg.2012;83(10):866-874.
    [12]Tian JW,Wang L,Xia T,et al.Posterior short segmental fixation combined with intermediate screws vs conventional intersegmental fixation for monosegmental thoracolumbar fractures.Orthopedics.2011;34(8):e389-e396.
    [13]王智方,胡侦明,郝杰,等.经椎弓根内固定治疗退行性腰椎侧凸并椎管狭窄症:半年随访矫正角度无丢失[J].中国组织工程研究,2014,18(17):2728-2733.
    [14]Guan HG,Wang G,Huo ZM,et al.Minimally invasive surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disease with Iso C-3Dnavigation under Mast Quadrant system.Zhongguo Gu Shang.2012;25(6):451-454.
    [15]祝孟坤,刘宏建,皮国富,等.后路内固定术结合经皮椎体成形术治疗多节段胸腰椎骨质疏松性压缩骨折合并椎管狭窄[J].医药论坛杂志,2010,24(30):12-14.
    [16]马进峰,陈伯华,李娟,等.经椎弓根植骨椎体成形联合椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰椎骨折[J].中华创伤杂志,2013,29(6):513-515.
    [17]方永超,冯新民,陶玉平,等.骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉内固定伤椎椎体成形术治疗伴神经症状的骨质疏松性椎体骨折[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2012,22(4):376-378.
    [18]李家谋,张昆亚,韩伟峰,等.短节段椎弓根螺钉置入内固定椎体成形治疗胸腰椎骨折的生物力学检测[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2011,15(39):7284-7287.
    [19]杨岱青.骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉内固定伤椎椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折效果观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2013,22(4):393-394.
    [20]Marco RA,Meyer BC,Kushwaha VP.Thoracolumbar burst fractures trea-ted with posterior decompression and pedicle screw instrumentation sup-plemented with balloon-assisted vertebroplasty and calcium phosphate re-construction surgical/technigue.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2010;92(1):67-76.
    [21]Jansson K,Blomqvist P,Svedmark P,et al.Thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in Sweden:an analysis of 13,496 patients admitted to hospital.Eur J Epidemiol.2010;25(6):431-437.
    [22]林欣,李家谋,张昆亚,等.经皮椎体成形术与椎弓根螺钉固定治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折的生物力学研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(9):861-863.
    [23]宓士军,周广军,孙敬宇,等.膨胀式椎弓根螺钉固定联合椎体成形治疗严重骨质疏松椎体爆裂骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2010,6(16):519-521.
    [24]Liao JC,Fan KF,Keorochana G,et al.Grafting after short-seg-columbar burst fracture:calcium sulfate cement versus autogenous iliac bone graft.Spine.2010;35(15):1482-1488.
    [25]于亮,蒋伟宇,赵刘军,等.骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉固定结合椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰段爆裂骨折[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2014,14(8):984-987.
    [26]刘达,康夏,郑伟,等.骨质疏松绵羊腰椎膨胀式椎弓根螺钉与骨水泥强化椎弓根螺钉固定稳定性的动态比较研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2014,24(8):747-751.
    [27]荆丹峰,许艺荠,孙太存,等.骨水泥注入中空侧孔椎弓根螺钉内固定骨质疏松性腰椎退变:强化技术要点[J].中国组织工程研究,2014,18(47):7556-7560.
    [28]Knavel EM,Rad AE,Thielen KR,et al.Clinical outcomeswith hemivertebral filling during percutaneous vertebroplasty.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.2009;30(3):496-499.
    [29]Anderson PA,Froyshteter AB,Tontz WL Jr,et al.Meta-analysis of vertebral augmentation compared with conservative treatment for osteoporetic spinal fractures.JBone Miner Res.2013;28(2):372-382.
    [30]Foumey DR,Dettori JR,Norvell DC,et al.Does minimal access tubularassisted spine surgery increase or decrease complications in spinal de-compression or fusion.Spine.2010;35(9):57-65.
    [31]柳超,刘建,王雷,等.椎弓根螺钉短节段固定联合椎体成形术治疗单节段胸腰段骨质疏松性椎体爆裂骨折[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2013,23(4):347-351.
    [32]Tomita S,Molloy S,Jasper LE,et al.Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty with different bone cements.Spine.2004;29(11):1203-1207.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700