“十二五”期间政府部门及人民团体科普能力定量评价
|
摘要
政府部门及人民团体是我国科普工作的重要主体,目前国内还非常缺乏从部门角度对科普能力的相关评价。以"十二五"期间各部门的科普统计数据为基础,构建包含16个二级指标的科普能力建设指标体系和评价模型,对30个部门的科普能力进行定量评价。评价结果发现,各部门都在法定职责范围内努力开展科普工作,但部门科普能力尚存在不协调等问题,特别是在科普政策支持能力方面还有待进一步提高。
In China government organs and civil associations are the main body of science popularization work,but at present there is still lack of relevant evaluation of science popularization ability from the perspective of departments. Based on the statistical data of science popularization in the 12 th Five-Year Plan period, this study constructs a index system that including 16 secondary indicators and evaluation model for the quantitative evaluation of science popularization ability in 30 departments. The evaluation results show that all departments work hard to carry out the science popularization work within the scope of statutory responsibilities, but there are some problems in the ability of science popularization, especially in the aspect of policy support of science popularization, which urgently need to be improved.
In China government organs and civil associations are the main body of science popularization work,but at present there is still lack of relevant evaluation of science popularization ability from the perspective of departments. Based on the statistical data of science popularization in the 12 th Five-Year Plan period, this study constructs a index system that including 16 secondary indicators and evaluation model for the quantitative evaluation of science popularization ability in 30 departments. The evaluation results show that all departments work hard to carry out the science popularization work within the scope of statutory responsibilities, but there are some problems in the ability of science popularization, especially in the aspect of policy support of science popularization, which urgently need to be improved.
引文
[1]翟杰全.国家科技传播能力:影响因素与评价指标[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2006(8):3-6.
[2]张艳,石顺科.全国科普示范县(市、区)的示范期评价体系构建[J].科普研究,2013(5):21-24.
[3]李健民,杨耀武,张仁开.关于上海开展科普工作绩效评估的若干思考[J].科学学研究,2007(Z2):331-336.
[4]邱成利.推进我国科普资源开发与建设的若干思考[J].中国科技资源导刊,2015,3(47):1-6,14.DOI:10.3772/j.issn.1674-1544.2015.03.001
[5]李婷.地区科普能力指标体系的构建及评价研究[J].中国科技论坛,2011(7):12-17.
[6]张慧君,郑念.区域科普能力评价指标体系构建与分析[J].科技和产业,2014,2(14):126-131.
[7]任嵘嵘,郑念,赵萌,等.我国地区科普能力评价:基于熵权法:GEM[J].技术经济,2013,2(32):59-64.
[8]张立军,张潇,陈菲菲.基于分形模型的区域科普能力评价与分析[J].科技管理研究,2015(2):44-48.
[9]佟贺丰,刘润生,张泽玉,等.地区科普力度评价指标体系构建与分析[J].中国软科学,2008(12):54-60.
[10]卓丽洪,李群,王宾,等.中国地区科普驱动力指标体系构建与评价[J].中国科技论坛,2016(8):95-101.
[11]GODIN B,GINGRAS Y.What is scientific and technological culture and how is measured?A multidisc tensional model[J].Public Understanding of Science,2000(9):43-58.
[12]ARNE Schirrmacher.Popular science between news and education:A European perspective[J].Science&Education,2012(3):289-291.
[13]GOUVEIA F,KURTENBACH E.Mapping the web relations of science centres and museums from Latin America[J].Scientometrics,2009,79(3):491-505.
[2]张艳,石顺科.全国科普示范县(市、区)的示范期评价体系构建[J].科普研究,2013(5):21-24.
[3]李健民,杨耀武,张仁开.关于上海开展科普工作绩效评估的若干思考[J].科学学研究,2007(Z2):331-336.
[4]邱成利.推进我国科普资源开发与建设的若干思考[J].中国科技资源导刊,2015,3(47):1-6,14.DOI:10.3772/j.issn.1674-1544.2015.03.001
[5]李婷.地区科普能力指标体系的构建及评价研究[J].中国科技论坛,2011(7):12-17.
[6]张慧君,郑念.区域科普能力评价指标体系构建与分析[J].科技和产业,2014,2(14):126-131.
[7]任嵘嵘,郑念,赵萌,等.我国地区科普能力评价:基于熵权法:GEM[J].技术经济,2013,2(32):59-64.
[8]张立军,张潇,陈菲菲.基于分形模型的区域科普能力评价与分析[J].科技管理研究,2015(2):44-48.
[9]佟贺丰,刘润生,张泽玉,等.地区科普力度评价指标体系构建与分析[J].中国软科学,2008(12):54-60.
[10]卓丽洪,李群,王宾,等.中国地区科普驱动力指标体系构建与评价[J].中国科技论坛,2016(8):95-101.
[11]GODIN B,GINGRAS Y.What is scientific and technological culture and how is measured?A multidisc tensional model[J].Public Understanding of Science,2000(9):43-58.
[12]ARNE Schirrmacher.Popular science between news and education:A European perspective[J].Science&Education,2012(3):289-291.
[13]GOUVEIA F,KURTENBACH E.Mapping the web relations of science centres and museums from Latin America[J].Scientometrics,2009,79(3):491-505.