摘要
讨论了总有机碳分析仪法在进行湖泊沉积物TOC测量过程中存在的问题,并给出了解决方案。用优化后的方法对美国国家标准与技术研究所(NIST)标样SRM 1941b和SRM1649b,以及国家标准物质GSS-9进行重复测试。结果显示,相对标准偏差均小于1%,同时测量值与标准参考值的相对误差也在±2%之内。说明该方法精密度高,测量结果准确可靠。
Problems frequently encountered during TOC testing were discussed and corresponding solutions were provided. NIST standards SRM 1941 b and SRM 1649 b,as well as the national standard substance GSS-9 were measured repeatedly based on the optimized method. The results showed that relative standard deviations were all less than 1%; meanwhile,the relative errors between measured values and standard reference values were within ± 2%. It indicated that the method had high precision and the measured results were accurate and reliable.
引文
[1] Meyer P. Org. Geochem.,1997,27(5-6):213
[2] Huang Q,Meng Z Q,Liu H L. Sci. China,Ser. B,1990,5:652黄麒,孟昭强,刘海玲.中国科学(B辑),1990,5:652
[3] Xu Y,Ai L,Tan L,et al. Chem. Geol.,2006,235(3-4):262
[4] Yancheva G,Nowaczyk N,Mingram J,et al. Nature. 2007,445:74
[5] Qiu L,Williams D,Gvorzdkov A,et al. Geology. 1993,21(1):25
[6] Yu B,Guo Y Q,Yang L S. Guangdong Forestry Science and Technology,2007,23(1):58于彬,郭彦青,杨乐苏.广东林业科技,2007,23(1):58
[7] Beaudoin A. J. Paleolimnol.,2003,29:387
[8] Zhu G W,Qin B Q,Gao G,et al. Chin. J. Anal. Lab.,2004,23(8):72朱广伟,秦宝强,高光,等.分析试验室,2004,23(8):72
[9] Qian B,Liu L,Xiao X. J. Hehai Univ. Nat. Sci. Edn.,2011,39(1):34钱宝,刘凌,肖潇.河海大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(1):34
[10] Reference Value for TOC in SRM 1941b,NIST:Gaithersburg,MD,2011
[11] Certificate of Analysis for Standard Reference Material 1649a,NIST:Gaithersburg,MD,2007
[12] Wang J,Zhu L,Wang Y,et al. Quatern. Int. 2012,250:49
[13] Wang Q H,Ren Y F,Meng L,et al. Chin. J. Anal. Lab.,2013,32(10):41王巧环,任玉芬,孟龄,等.分析试验室,2013,32(10):41
[14] Wei X J,Hong M,Yu X Q,et al. J. NM. Agr. Univ.,2011,32(3):161魏晓军,红梅,于先泉,等.内蒙古农业大学学报,2011,32(3):161
[15] Wang Y,Wang J,Zhu L,et al. Holocene. 2017,27(10):1475
[16] Zhang X,Xu B,Günther F,et al. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2017,122:9262