ESI在中国高校一流学科建设中的误区及对策分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Analysis of misunderstanding and countermeasures of ESI in constructing first-class disciplines in Chinese universities
  • 作者:徐仲 ; 吴曼
  • 英文作者:XU Zhong;WU Man;Library,Qingdao University of Science & Technology;
  • 关键词:一流学科 ; 学科建设 ; SCI ; ESI
  • 英文关键词:first-class disciplines;;disciplines construction;;Scientific Citation Index;;Essential Science Indicators
  • 中文刊名:QDHS
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
  • 机构:青岛科技大学图书馆;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-15
  • 出版单位:青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.35;No.136
  • 基金:青岛科技大学人文社会科学基金项目(15XB36)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:QDHS201902020
  • 页数:5
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:37-1394/C
  • 分类号:122-126
摘要
ESI针对不同学科领域,对国家/地区科研水平、机构学术声誉、科学家学术影响力以及期刊学术水平进行全面衡量,为学科建设提供了重要的方向性指导。但是,应当充分认识ESI的局限性,避免在学科建设中唯ESI化。过分追求ESI指标,有可能导致学科人才结构奇异化和学术机构人才领域趋同化,逐步抹杀一个学校长期积累的学科优势,并导致新兴学科发展受限。在一流学科建设中,应进一步完善学科评价指标,以学科顶层规划引导学科人才建设,以发挥特色学科优势实现传统产业的涅槃重生,并合理规划新兴学科,为"双一流"大学建设注入新的生机。
        ESI provides an important directional guidance for the construction of disciplines by measuring the scientific research level of national/regional research, the academic reputation of institutions, the academic influence of scientists,and the academic level of journals in different disciplines. However, the limitations of ESI should be fully recognized so as to avoid only ESI in the construction of disciplines. Over emphases on ESI may lead to the imperfect of the discipline talent structure and the assimilation of the talents in academic institutions, which may gradually obliterate the academic advantages accumulated by a university for a long time, and result in the development restrictions for emerging disciplines. So in the construction of first-class discipline in Chinese universities, it is necessary to further improve the evaluation index of discipline,guide the construction of discipline talents with top planning, realize the rebirth of traditional industries by giving full play to the advantages of characteristic discipline, and inject new vitality into the construction of "double first-class" by rational planning of emerging disciplines.
引文
[1]许子媛.“双一流”建设下高校优势学科进入ESI动态监测研究[J].情报理论与实践,2018(4):77-81.
    [2]郭战伟.高校进入ESI学科策略研究[J].中国高校科技,2017(5):45-47.
    [3]丁佐奇.中国高校主办的SCI收录期刊对ESI学科贡献度研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018(7):722-727.
    [4]Journal Citation Reports[EB/OL].[2016-06-30]. https://jcr.clarivate.com/JCRLandingPage Action.action.
    [5]李兴国,赵晓冬.中国大学评价指标与ESI学科指标关联程度的统计检验[J].统计与决策,2017(3):108-111.
    [6]张莉莉,李兴国.中国ESI学科建设研究的现状、问题及对策—基于2003—2017年核心期刊文献的计量分析[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2018(2):87-96.
    [7]何春建. ESI学科排名指标的异化与纠正[J].图书情报知识,2017(178):122-129.
    [8]Essential Science Indicators[EB/OL].[2019-02-10]. https://esi.clarivate.com/indicatorsAction. action.
    [9]曹志梅,刘伟辉,杨光.高校ESI潜势学科排名提升策略探讨[J].情报探索,2017(4):44-47.
    [10]张磊,吴素华.中国特色“双一流”建设评价体系的构建[J].北京教育(高教版),2018(7):24-27.
    [11]王一华.基于IF(JCR)、IF(Scopus)、H指数、SJR值、SNIP值的期刊评价研究[J].图书情报工作,2011(16):144-148.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700