软性输尿管镜(FURS)与经皮肾镜(PCNL)术式治疗肾结石的效果观察
|
摘要
目的比较分析软性输尿管镜(FURS)与经皮肾镜(PCNL)两种术式治疗直径≤2.0 cm肾结石的临床效果。方法将160例肾结石患者随机分为两组,各80例。对照组患者采用PCNL术式治疗,观察组患者采用FURS术式治疗。观察比较两组手术相关指标(手术时间、术中出血量、一期结石清除率、术后VAS疼痛评分、住院时间)、术后肾功能[血尿素氮(BUN)、血肌酐(Cr)水平]及并发症发生情况。结果两组患者手术均顺利完成,观察组手术时间、术中出血量、术后VAS疼痛评分及住院时间均少于对照组,术后并发症发生率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01);两组一期结石清除率及术后BUN、Cr水平比较,均无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论 FURS治疗直径≤2.0 cm肾结石具有手术时间短、术中出血较少、术后疼痛较轻、术后并发症发生率较低等优势,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To explore the difference in FURS and PCNL in the treating renal calculus(diameter≤2.0 cm).Methods One hundred and sixty of renal calculi patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group,80 cases in each group.The control group was treated by PCNL and observation group was done by FURS.The operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,stone clearance rate,visual analogue scale(VAS),hospitalization time,renal function(BUN and Cr)and the incidence of complication were compared between the two groups.Results The operation was successfully completed in both groups.The operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,VAS score,hospitalization time and the incidence of complications in the observation group showed significantly lower than those of the control group(P<0.05 or P<0.01).There was no significant difference in the stone clearance rate and levels of BUN and Cr between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Using FURS to treat renal calculi(diameter≤2.0 cm)can shorten operation time,decease postoperative pain,intraoperative bleeding,and the incidence of complications.
Objective To explore the difference in FURS and PCNL in the treating renal calculus(diameter≤2.0 cm).Methods One hundred and sixty of renal calculi patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group,80 cases in each group.The control group was treated by PCNL and observation group was done by FURS.The operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,stone clearance rate,visual analogue scale(VAS),hospitalization time,renal function(BUN and Cr)and the incidence of complication were compared between the two groups.Results The operation was successfully completed in both groups.The operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,VAS score,hospitalization time and the incidence of complications in the observation group showed significantly lower than those of the control group(P<0.05 or P<0.01).There was no significant difference in the stone clearance rate and levels of BUN and Cr between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Using FURS to treat renal calculi(diameter≤2.0 cm)can shorten operation time,decease postoperative pain,intraoperative bleeding,and the incidence of complications.
引文
[1] 袁留亚.尿石症易感基因多态性的研究进展[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2014,34(3):410- 415.
[2] 高小平,李星娅,高丽梅.排石操配合中药口服在泌尿系统结石患者中的效果[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(14):208.
[3] 薛爱兵,金讯波,张海洋,等.泌尿系感染与肾结石复发的临床探讨[J].泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2014,6(2):15-20.
[4] 袁进.部分性鹿角形肾结石应用两种方法治疗的临床比较[J].医药前沿,2016,6(9):109-110.
[5] 杨嗣星,廖文彪,熊云鹤.软性输尿管镜技术在上尿路疾病诊治中的新进展[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2015,30(11):963-966.
[6] 甘露,张忠云,黄桂晓,等.单通道经皮肾镜取石术联合输尿管软镜治疗鹿角状肾结石28例[J].海南医学,2013,24(18):2720-2721.
[7] 刘斌,董杰,周水根,等.经皮肾镜及输尿管软镜治疗孤立肾肾盂结石的临床疗效及对肾功能影响的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(5):430- 433.
[8] 樊松,梁朝朝.输尿管软镜技术的教学体会[J].安徽卫生职业技术学院学报,2016,15(3):113-114.
[2] 高小平,李星娅,高丽梅.排石操配合中药口服在泌尿系统结石患者中的效果[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(14):208.
[3] 薛爱兵,金讯波,张海洋,等.泌尿系感染与肾结石复发的临床探讨[J].泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2014,6(2):15-20.
[4] 袁进.部分性鹿角形肾结石应用两种方法治疗的临床比较[J].医药前沿,2016,6(9):109-110.
[5] 杨嗣星,廖文彪,熊云鹤.软性输尿管镜技术在上尿路疾病诊治中的新进展[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2015,30(11):963-966.
[6] 甘露,张忠云,黄桂晓,等.单通道经皮肾镜取石术联合输尿管软镜治疗鹿角状肾结石28例[J].海南医学,2013,24(18):2720-2721.
[7] 刘斌,董杰,周水根,等.经皮肾镜及输尿管软镜治疗孤立肾肾盂结石的临床疗效及对肾功能影响的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(5):430- 433.
[8] 樊松,梁朝朝.输尿管软镜技术的教学体会[J].安徽卫生职业技术学院学报,2016,15(3):113-114.