“融合式研究”评价框架的应用与分析——基于中国科学院的实践
|
摘要
在科技创新驱动经济社会发展的大趋势下,融合式研究作为一种以解决重大经济社会问题为目标的科研新范式受到高度重视。该范式具有不同于传统科研模式的特点,因而传统的科研评价模型也不再与之相适应。如何开展融合式研究的评价是推动融合式研究的一个关键问题。中国科学院为落实"十三五"规划部署,探索建立了融合式研究的评价框架并开展了试点评价。
In the current trend of encouraging science, technology and innovation to drive economic and social development, convergence research is regarded as a new research paradigm with the ultimate purpose of solving grand economic or societal problems. Distinct with traditional research paradigm, this new paradigm is not fit with traditional research evaluation framework, which means how to develop an appropriate evaluation framework for convergence research is one of the key tasks. In order to implement its 13 th five year plan, Chinese Academy of Sciences has formed an evaluation framework for convergence research, and has completed a pilot evaluation based on this framework.
In the current trend of encouraging science, technology and innovation to drive economic and social development, convergence research is regarded as a new research paradigm with the ultimate purpose of solving grand economic or societal problems. Distinct with traditional research paradigm, this new paradigm is not fit with traditional research evaluation framework, which means how to develop an appropriate evaluation framework for convergence research is one of the key tasks. In order to implement its 13 th five year plan, Chinese Academy of Sciences has formed an evaluation framework for convergence research, and has completed a pilot evaluation based on this framework.
引文
程妮,熊洋,官世强.2015.基于专利引文的知识转移研究:以我国“乳制品加工”领域为例[J].图书馆学研究,18:96-101.
黄鲁成,黄斌.2014.基于模糊集的国际专利分类与产业的关联性评估[J].情报杂志,7:76-80.
黄颖,高天舒,王志楠,等.2016.基于Web of Science分类的跨学科测度研究[J].科研管理,37(3):124-132.
江洪,王微,赵凯.2014.基于专利的领域技术知识流动网络特征分析:以LTE-Advanced技术为例[J].情报杂志,33(8):64-69.
李江.2014.“跨学科性”的概念框架与测度[J].图书情报知识,3:87-93.
田创,赵亚娟.2017.专利文献与产业类目的映射研究:以2015年度中科院专利与《战略性新兴产业分类》为例[J].知识管理论坛,2(1):22-31.
吴菲菲,黄鲁成,石媛嫄.2013.基于文献和专利相互引用的科学与技术关系分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,34(10):13-20.
肖小溪,刘文斌,徐芳,等.2018.“融合式研究”的新范式及其评价框架研究[J].科学学研究,36(12):131-138.
杨良斌,金碧辉.2009.跨学科测度指标体系的构建研究[J].情报杂志,28(7):65-69.
中国科学院.2017.中国科学院“十三五”发展规划纲要[EB/OL].http://www.cas.cn/yw/201609/W020160906628615831929.pdf,3-10.
中国科学院.2017.融合科学领域竞争优势国际比较分析报告(内部资料)[R].北京:中国科学院.
周建中,代涛.2013.美国研究领域国际标杆评估的方法与启示[J].科学学与科学技术管理,34(5):20-27.
Bainbridge W S,Roco M C.2016.Handbook of Science and Technology Convergence[R].Berlin:Springer.
Belcher B M,Rasmussen K E,Kemshaw M R,et al.2016.Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinarycon-text[J].Research Evaluation,25(1):1-17.
Canizares C R.2011.MIT Comments:Bioeconomy Blueprint[R].Boston:MIT Press.
European Union.2014.Rome declaration on responsible research and innovation in Europe[EB/OL].https://ec.europa.eu/re-search/swafs/pdf/rome_declaration_RRI_final_21_November.pdf.
Kortum S,Putnam J.1997.Assigning patents to industries:Tests of the Yale technology concordance[J].Economic Systems Research,9(2):161-176.
Kuhlmann S.2017.Addressing Grand Challenges:Towards Transformative Science and Innovation Policy[M].Vienna:EU-SPRI Forum.
Lybbert T J,Zolas N J.2014.Getting patents and economic data to speak to each other:An'algorithmic links with probabilities'approach for joint analyses of patenting and economic activity[J].Research Policy,43(3):530-542.
Meyer M.2000.Does science push technology?Patents citing scientific literature[J].Research Policy,29(3):409-434.
MIT.2011.The Third Revolution:The Convergence of the Life Sciences,Physical Sciences and Engineering(White Paper)[R].Washington DC:MIT Office.
Narin F,Hamilton K S,Olivastro D.1997.The increasing linkage between US technology and public science[J].Research Policy,26(3):317-330.
NRC.2009.A New Biology for the 21st Century[R].Washington DC:National Academies Press.
NRC.2014.Convergence:Facilitating Transdiscip linaryIntegration of Life Sciences,Physical Sciences,Engineering,and Beyond[M].Washington DC:National Academies Press.
Rafols I,Leydesdorff L,O'Hare A,et al.2012.How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research:A comparison between innovation studies and business&management[J].Research Policy,41(7):1262-1282.
Roco M C,Bainbridge W,Tonn B.2013.Convergence of Knowledge,Technology and Society:Beyond Convergence of Nano-Bio-Info-Cognitive Technologies[M].Dordrecht:Springer.
Stahl N Z.2017.Fostering the convergent science revolution[EB/OL].https://www.tradelineinc.com/print/93846,11-3.
Sharp P A,Hockfield S.2017.Convergence:The future of health[J].Science,355(6325):589-589.
Way M,Ahmad S A.2013.The San Francisco declaration on research assessment[J].Journal of Cell Science,126(9):1903-1904.
黄鲁成,黄斌.2014.基于模糊集的国际专利分类与产业的关联性评估[J].情报杂志,7:76-80.
黄颖,高天舒,王志楠,等.2016.基于Web of Science分类的跨学科测度研究[J].科研管理,37(3):124-132.
江洪,王微,赵凯.2014.基于专利的领域技术知识流动网络特征分析:以LTE-Advanced技术为例[J].情报杂志,33(8):64-69.
李江.2014.“跨学科性”的概念框架与测度[J].图书情报知识,3:87-93.
田创,赵亚娟.2017.专利文献与产业类目的映射研究:以2015年度中科院专利与《战略性新兴产业分类》为例[J].知识管理论坛,2(1):22-31.
吴菲菲,黄鲁成,石媛嫄.2013.基于文献和专利相互引用的科学与技术关系分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,34(10):13-20.
肖小溪,刘文斌,徐芳,等.2018.“融合式研究”的新范式及其评价框架研究[J].科学学研究,36(12):131-138.
杨良斌,金碧辉.2009.跨学科测度指标体系的构建研究[J].情报杂志,28(7):65-69.
中国科学院.2017.中国科学院“十三五”发展规划纲要[EB/OL].http://www.cas.cn/yw/201609/W020160906628615831929.pdf,3-10.
中国科学院.2017.融合科学领域竞争优势国际比较分析报告(内部资料)[R].北京:中国科学院.
周建中,代涛.2013.美国研究领域国际标杆评估的方法与启示[J].科学学与科学技术管理,34(5):20-27.
Bainbridge W S,Roco M C.2016.Handbook of Science and Technology Convergence[R].Berlin:Springer.
Belcher B M,Rasmussen K E,Kemshaw M R,et al.2016.Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinarycon-text[J].Research Evaluation,25(1):1-17.
Canizares C R.2011.MIT Comments:Bioeconomy Blueprint[R].Boston:MIT Press.
European Union.2014.Rome declaration on responsible research and innovation in Europe[EB/OL].https://ec.europa.eu/re-search/swafs/pdf/rome_declaration_RRI_final_21_November.pdf.
Kortum S,Putnam J.1997.Assigning patents to industries:Tests of the Yale technology concordance[J].Economic Systems Research,9(2):161-176.
Kuhlmann S.2017.Addressing Grand Challenges:Towards Transformative Science and Innovation Policy[M].Vienna:EU-SPRI Forum.
Lybbert T J,Zolas N J.2014.Getting patents and economic data to speak to each other:An'algorithmic links with probabilities'approach for joint analyses of patenting and economic activity[J].Research Policy,43(3):530-542.
Meyer M.2000.Does science push technology?Patents citing scientific literature[J].Research Policy,29(3):409-434.
MIT.2011.The Third Revolution:The Convergence of the Life Sciences,Physical Sciences and Engineering(White Paper)[R].Washington DC:MIT Office.
Narin F,Hamilton K S,Olivastro D.1997.The increasing linkage between US technology and public science[J].Research Policy,26(3):317-330.
NRC.2009.A New Biology for the 21st Century[R].Washington DC:National Academies Press.
NRC.2014.Convergence:Facilitating Transdiscip linaryIntegration of Life Sciences,Physical Sciences,Engineering,and Beyond[M].Washington DC:National Academies Press.
Rafols I,Leydesdorff L,O'Hare A,et al.2012.How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research:A comparison between innovation studies and business&management[J].Research Policy,41(7):1262-1282.
Roco M C,Bainbridge W,Tonn B.2013.Convergence of Knowledge,Technology and Society:Beyond Convergence of Nano-Bio-Info-Cognitive Technologies[M].Dordrecht:Springer.
Stahl N Z.2017.Fostering the convergent science revolution[EB/OL].https://www.tradelineinc.com/print/93846,11-3.
Sharp P A,Hockfield S.2017.Convergence:The future of health[J].Science,355(6325):589-589.
Way M,Ahmad S A.2013.The San Francisco declaration on research assessment[J].Journal of Cell Science,126(9):1903-1904.