基于第三方机构监测的武汉市小学生体质健康数据分析
|
摘要
目的了解基于第三方监测的武汉市小学生体质健康状况。方法采取整群抽样法抽取武汉市江岸区全体小学生,采用实验法对46 751小学生体质健康进行测试,使用武汉百年思博科技有限公司自主研发的《体育教育信息化2.0系统》进行数据处理。结果 1)武汉市小学生体质健康总合格率为88.27%,优良率26.17%,不及格率11.73%。2)身体形态指标体质指数正常率为71.41%～77.39%,超重比例为12.54%～14.92%,肥胖为7.88%～10.83%,且随年级升高而上升,各年级男生高于女生。3)身体机能指标肺活量为925～2 419 ml,平均分为66.3～83.0,且男生高于女生。4)身体素质中柔韧素质指标坐位体前屈为6.9～11.6 cm,男生随年级升高而下降,女生较平稳;平均分为73.7～76.9。速度素质50 m成绩为10.2～12.9 s,且男生好于女生。灵敏素质指标1 min跳绳为42.5～115.0个/min,女生好于男生;平均分为65.6～71.4。力量素质指标1 min仰卧起坐为27.7～32.4个/min,男生好于女生;平均分为70.7～72.6。耐力素质指标50 m×8为117.1～123.3s,男生好于女生;平均分66.3～71.5。结论武汉市小学生体质健康总体一般,优良率偏低,不及格偏高。身体形态表现优秀、身体机能表现良好、五大身体素质表现一般或较差。
Obejective To understand the physical health of primary school students based on the monitoring of third-party organization in Wuhan. Methods Extraction all the primary school students of the Jiangan district in Wuhan by cluster sampling area, the physical health of 46 751 primary school students were tested by experimental method, and used informationization 2.0 system by Wuhan Bainiansibo science and technology company for statistical analysis. Results 1) The qualified rate of physical health of primary school students was 88.27%, distinguished achiever ratio was 26.17%, and failure rate was 11.73%. 2) The normal rate of body shape index(BMI) was 71.41～77.39%, the overweight rate was 12.54～14.92%, and the obesity rate was 7.88～10.83%, boys were higher than girls.3) The vital capacity of the body function index was 925 ～2 419 ml, with an average score of 66.3～83.0, and boys were higher than girls. 4) The forward flexion of the sitting body of flexibility quality was 6.9 ～11.6 cm, which decreased with the rise of the grade of boys and was stable for girls, and the average score was 73.7 ～76.9. The speed quality of 50 meters was 10.2 ～12.9 s, and boys was better than girls. The index of sensitive quality was 42.5～115.0 per min, boys were better than girls, and the average score was 65.6～71.4. The strength quality index of 1 minute sit-ups was 27.7 ～32.4 per min, boys were better than girls, and the average score was70.7 ～72.6. The endurance quality index 50 m ×8 was 117.1 ～123.3 s, boys were better than girls, and average score was 66.3 ～71.5.Conclusion The general overall level of primary school students' physical health in Wuhan is general, the rate of excellence is low and the rate of failure is high, body shape development is good, physical function is fair, five physical qualities are general or poor.
Obejective To understand the physical health of primary school students based on the monitoring of third-party organization in Wuhan. Methods Extraction all the primary school students of the Jiangan district in Wuhan by cluster sampling area, the physical health of 46 751 primary school students were tested by experimental method, and used informationization 2.0 system by Wuhan Bainiansibo science and technology company for statistical analysis. Results 1) The qualified rate of physical health of primary school students was 88.27%, distinguished achiever ratio was 26.17%, and failure rate was 11.73%. 2) The normal rate of body shape index(BMI) was 71.41～77.39%, the overweight rate was 12.54～14.92%, and the obesity rate was 7.88～10.83%, boys were higher than girls.3) The vital capacity of the body function index was 925 ～2 419 ml, with an average score of 66.3～83.0, and boys were higher than girls. 4) The forward flexion of the sitting body of flexibility quality was 6.9 ～11.6 cm, which decreased with the rise of the grade of boys and was stable for girls, and the average score was 73.7 ～76.9. The speed quality of 50 meters was 10.2 ～12.9 s, and boys was better than girls. The index of sensitive quality was 42.5～115.0 per min, boys were better than girls, and the average score was 65.6～71.4. The strength quality index of 1 minute sit-ups was 27.7 ～32.4 per min, boys were better than girls, and the average score was70.7 ～72.6. The endurance quality index 50 m ×8 was 117.1 ～123.3 s, boys were better than girls, and average score was 66.3 ～71.5.Conclusion The general overall level of primary school students' physical health in Wuhan is general, the rate of excellence is low and the rate of failure is high, body shape development is good, physical function is fair, five physical qualities are general or poor.
引文
[1]郑小凤,张朋,刘新民.我国中小学学生体质测试政策演进及政策完善研究[J].体育科学,2017,37(10):13-20.
[2]谭敦民.解读:《“健康中国2030”规划纲要》[J].祝您健康,2017(01):4-5.
[3]任玉庆,潘月红.苏南地区小学生体质健康与生活方式特征分析[J].中国学校卫生,2018,39(1):38-41.
[4]梁媛.沈阳市小学生身体质量指数现状及其影响因素的调查研究[D].沈阳师范大学,2018.
[5]王敏.广东省城乡13~18岁青少年体质健康现状比较研究[J].广州体育学院学报,2018,38(4):105-107.
[6]张友琴.石化企业中小学生身体形态机能分析[J].中国学校卫生,2000,21(3):234.
[7]王金灿.运动选材学[M].北京:人民体育出版社,2009.
[8]张兰荣.柔韧素质的解剖生理基础和训练[J].体育教学与训练,1991(06):31-32.
[9]杨丽敏,张波.基于坐位体前屈的中小学生柔韧素质的年龄特征研究[J].山东体育学院学报,2013,29(1):87-90.
[10]宋启灿,董平.儿童少年柔韧素质发展规律初探[J].上海体育学院学报,1986(01):78-80.
[11]杨亚飞.7~8岁儿童柔韧素质发展的实验研究[D].北京体育大学,2017.
[12]上海市学生体质健康监测中心. 2012年《国家学生体质健康标准》测试结果公告解读[N].文汇报,2013-09-26(011).
[13]汪君萍,刘凯文.青少年生长发育的速度素质特征与发展阶段研究[J].广州体育学院学报,2017,37(6):100-104.
[14]苑盛伟.大连市市区小学生体质健康现状研究[J].武术研究,2016,1(3):148-150.
[15]刘天阳.吉林省城乡7~15岁儿童灵敏性的对比研究[D].东北师范大学,2014.
[16]祁文俊.不同干预对常州市钟楼区小学生体质影响的研究[D].苏州大学,2017.
[17]喜悦.5类少数民族儿童少年身体素质变化特点及趋势的研究[D].北京体育大学,2015.
[18]王沂.浅析青少年力量素质训练的影响因素[J].当代体育科技,2013,3(30):41+43.
[19]黄涛,龚诗国.黄冈市10~12岁农村留守儿童体质状况研究[J].湖北体育科技,2018,37(6):505-509.
[20]万琼,谢梦瑶.1985~2014年武汉市城乡中小学生身体素质差异的变化趋势[J].中国校医,2018,32(2):100-104.
[2]谭敦民.解读:《“健康中国2030”规划纲要》[J].祝您健康,2017(01):4-5.
[3]任玉庆,潘月红.苏南地区小学生体质健康与生活方式特征分析[J].中国学校卫生,2018,39(1):38-41.
[4]梁媛.沈阳市小学生身体质量指数现状及其影响因素的调查研究[D].沈阳师范大学,2018.
[5]王敏.广东省城乡13~18岁青少年体质健康现状比较研究[J].广州体育学院学报,2018,38(4):105-107.
[6]张友琴.石化企业中小学生身体形态机能分析[J].中国学校卫生,2000,21(3):234.
[7]王金灿.运动选材学[M].北京:人民体育出版社,2009.
[8]张兰荣.柔韧素质的解剖生理基础和训练[J].体育教学与训练,1991(06):31-32.
[9]杨丽敏,张波.基于坐位体前屈的中小学生柔韧素质的年龄特征研究[J].山东体育学院学报,2013,29(1):87-90.
[10]宋启灿,董平.儿童少年柔韧素质发展规律初探[J].上海体育学院学报,1986(01):78-80.
[11]杨亚飞.7~8岁儿童柔韧素质发展的实验研究[D].北京体育大学,2017.
[12]上海市学生体质健康监测中心. 2012年《国家学生体质健康标准》测试结果公告解读[N].文汇报,2013-09-26(011).
[13]汪君萍,刘凯文.青少年生长发育的速度素质特征与发展阶段研究[J].广州体育学院学报,2017,37(6):100-104.
[14]苑盛伟.大连市市区小学生体质健康现状研究[J].武术研究,2016,1(3):148-150.
[15]刘天阳.吉林省城乡7~15岁儿童灵敏性的对比研究[D].东北师范大学,2014.
[16]祁文俊.不同干预对常州市钟楼区小学生体质影响的研究[D].苏州大学,2017.
[17]喜悦.5类少数民族儿童少年身体素质变化特点及趋势的研究[D].北京体育大学,2015.
[18]王沂.浅析青少年力量素质训练的影响因素[J].当代体育科技,2013,3(30):41+43.
[19]黄涛,龚诗国.黄冈市10~12岁农村留守儿童体质状况研究[J].湖北体育科技,2018,37(6):505-509.
[20]万琼,谢梦瑶.1985~2014年武汉市城乡中小学生身体素质差异的变化趋势[J].中国校医,2018,32(2):100-104.