编辑部流程管控中存在的问题及建议——基于4家编辑部的访谈分析
|
摘要
【目的】研究编辑部流程管控中存在的突出问题,探讨当前学术期刊高质量发展路径。【方法】针对编辑部工作流程的主要环节,对4家编辑部的8位编辑进行深度访谈。【结果】学术期刊编辑部的工作流程虽经过适应性改造,但在初审、复审、外审、终审、校对、传播等主要环节上仍存在较多问题,如选稿质量参差不齐,把控不全面、不严谨、不仔细,专家匹配难度大、评审意见不到位,编辑工作和校对工作的流程不独立、职责不明确等。造成这些问题的原因是多方面的,如历史遗留因素、办刊经费有限、编辑部制度不完善、权力层级的秩序性约束、管理者多重身份下顾此失彼等。【结论】编辑部要从公开工作流程、建立专家数据库、创新传播方式等角度加强流程管控。
[Purposes] This paper aims to study prominent problems in workflowmanagement at editorial offices and promote the progress of high-quality development of journals in China. [Methods]Being specific to the main progress in the workflow,in-depth interviews were employed with eight editors from four editorial offices. [Findings]Despite adaptive improvement on the workflow,issues exist in the main sections like preliminary examination,review,anonymous peer review,final judgement,proofreading,and dissemination. Great variance in the quality of submission,incomplete review,difficulty in matching reviewers,irresponsible feedbacks,and overlap between editors and proofreaders are examples. Among the manifold causes,historical factors,limited funding,inadequate system,restriction in the chain of power,multiple identities of directors are noticeable. [Conclusions] Steps like making workflowopen to the public,setting up database of experts,and creating newmode of transmission should be taken from nowon to optimize the operations and reinforce control in workflow.
[Purposes] This paper aims to study prominent problems in workflowmanagement at editorial offices and promote the progress of high-quality development of journals in China. [Methods]Being specific to the main progress in the workflow,in-depth interviews were employed with eight editors from four editorial offices. [Findings]Despite adaptive improvement on the workflow,issues exist in the main sections like preliminary examination,review,anonymous peer review,final judgement,proofreading,and dissemination. Great variance in the quality of submission,incomplete review,difficulty in matching reviewers,irresponsible feedbacks,and overlap between editors and proofreaders are examples. Among the manifold causes,historical factors,limited funding,inadequate system,restriction in the chain of power,multiple identities of directors are noticeable. [Conclusions] Steps like making workflowopen to the public,setting up database of experts,and creating newmode of transmission should be taken from nowon to optimize the operations and reinforce control in workflow.
引文
[1]王广.哲学社会科学学术期刊建设面临的问题与应对之策[J].武汉大学学报(人文科学版),2017,70(5):103-110.
[2]黄颂杰.办刊的境况与学术期刊发展的问题与思考[J].云梦学刊,2016,37(1):16-22.
[3]杨爽,王卓,石学军.中国学术期刊审稿问题研究[J].山东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2014,30(4):90-93.
[4]徐雅雯,邓菁.高校优秀学术期刊审稿流程的优化[J].南通大学学报(社会科学版),2017,33(6):150-156.
[5]武文.期刊联合编辑部管理模式的实践探索[J].中国科技期刊研究,2008,19(4):539-541.
[6]姚吟月,陈锋.江苏省科技期刊人才结构和办刊资源分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(10):913-919.
[7]谢文亮,梁洁,郑添尹.“互联网+”下学术期刊的管理与经营机制创新[J].中国科技期刊研究,2016,27(7):725-731.
[8]刘东信.综合性科技学术期刊审稿人的选择和外审经验谈[J].编辑学报,2010,22(6):521-522.
[9]王明华.学术期刊出版工作中编校合一的问题及其解决[J].天津科技,2018,45(1):103-105.
[10]张海生,蔡宗模,吴朝平.学术期刊媒体融合发展:历程、问题与展望[J].中国编辑,2018(1):76-82.
[2]黄颂杰.办刊的境况与学术期刊发展的问题与思考[J].云梦学刊,2016,37(1):16-22.
[3]杨爽,王卓,石学军.中国学术期刊审稿问题研究[J].山东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2014,30(4):90-93.
[4]徐雅雯,邓菁.高校优秀学术期刊审稿流程的优化[J].南通大学学报(社会科学版),2017,33(6):150-156.
[5]武文.期刊联合编辑部管理模式的实践探索[J].中国科技期刊研究,2008,19(4):539-541.
[6]姚吟月,陈锋.江苏省科技期刊人才结构和办刊资源分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(10):913-919.
[7]谢文亮,梁洁,郑添尹.“互联网+”下学术期刊的管理与经营机制创新[J].中国科技期刊研究,2016,27(7):725-731.
[8]刘东信.综合性科技学术期刊审稿人的选择和外审经验谈[J].编辑学报,2010,22(6):521-522.
[9]王明华.学术期刊出版工作中编校合一的问题及其解决[J].天津科技,2018,45(1):103-105.
[10]张海生,蔡宗模,吴朝平.学术期刊媒体融合发展:历程、问题与展望[J].中国编辑,2018(1):76-82.