高质量发展指标体系构建及测度——以河北省为例
|
摘要
我国经济已由高速增长阶段转向高质量发展阶段。准确测度经济发展现状,需要构建高质量发展指标体系。根据高质量发展的内涵,构建了包含6个一级指标和24个二级指标构成的高质量发展指标体系,并以河北省为例运用2005-2016年经济运行数据进行实证测算。结果表明,河北省经济发展质量总体呈波动上升态势,但各维度发展并不均衡,经济活力和生态友好两个维度指标持续向好,而创新驱动、结构优化、民生改善这三个维度指标都出现了下滑和较大波动的情况,成为制约高质量发展的短板。
The development of China's economy has shifted from high-speed growth phase to high-quality development phase. And it is necessary to build a high-quality development indicator system to accurately measure the current situation of economic development. Therefore, based on the connotation of high-quality development, this paper constructs a high-quality development index system consisting of six first-level indicators and 24 second-level indicators, and takes the economic data of Hebei Province from 2005 to 2016 as an example for empirical calculation. The results show that the overall economic development quality of Hebei Province grows wavily, and the development of each dimension is not balanced. Among them, the economic vitality and eco-friendliness these two dimensions continue to improve, while the three dimensions of innovation drive, structural optimization and improvement of people's livelihood all experienced a decline, which became a short-term constraint to high-quality development.
The development of China's economy has shifted from high-speed growth phase to high-quality development phase. And it is necessary to build a high-quality development indicator system to accurately measure the current situation of economic development. Therefore, based on the connotation of high-quality development, this paper constructs a high-quality development index system consisting of six first-level indicators and 24 second-level indicators, and takes the economic data of Hebei Province from 2005 to 2016 as an example for empirical calculation. The results show that the overall economic development quality of Hebei Province grows wavily, and the development of each dimension is not balanced. Among them, the economic vitality and eco-friendliness these two dimensions continue to improve, while the three dimensions of innovation drive, structural optimization and improvement of people's livelihood all experienced a decline, which became a short-term constraint to high-quality development.
引文
[1] 金碚.关于“高质量发展”的经济学研究[J].中国工业经济,2018(4):5-18.
[2] 吕薇.探索体现高质量发展的评价指标体系[J].中国人大,2018(6):23-24.
[3] 殷醒民.高质量发展指标体系的五个维度[N].文汇报,2018-02-06(012).
[4] 鲁继通.我国高质量发展指标体系初探[J].中国经贸导刊,2017(7):4-7.
[5] 朱启贵.建立推动高质量发展的指标体系[N].文汇报,2018-02-06(12).
[6] 魏敏,李书昊.新常态下中国经济增长质量的评价体系构建与测度[J].经济学家,2018(4):19-26.
[7] 白俊红,王林东.创新驱动是否促进了经济增长质量的提升?[J].科学学研究,2016(11):17-25.
[8] 吴秀红.发展生态友好型经济的路径选择[N].吉林日报,2014-02-17(08).
[9] 李永友.经济波动对经济增长的减损效应:中国的经验证据[J].当代经济科学,2006(4):8-13.
[10] 孙宗杨,王庆石.通货膨胀对经济增长的影响及途径研究[J].东北财经大学学报,2013(3):49-54.
[11] 冯柏.货币供给与经济增长和通货膨胀关系研究——基于我国改革开放以来的SVAR模型实证检验[J].中国物价,2016(6):3-5.
[12] 马珊珊.城镇化对经济增长的促进机制研究[J].山西农经,2018(16):30-31.
[13] 王喜文.中国制造2025[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2015:150-151.
[2] 吕薇.探索体现高质量发展的评价指标体系[J].中国人大,2018(6):23-24.
[3] 殷醒民.高质量发展指标体系的五个维度[N].文汇报,2018-02-06(012).
[4] 鲁继通.我国高质量发展指标体系初探[J].中国经贸导刊,2017(7):4-7.
[5] 朱启贵.建立推动高质量发展的指标体系[N].文汇报,2018-02-06(12).
[6] 魏敏,李书昊.新常态下中国经济增长质量的评价体系构建与测度[J].经济学家,2018(4):19-26.
[7] 白俊红,王林东.创新驱动是否促进了经济增长质量的提升?[J].科学学研究,2016(11):17-25.
[8] 吴秀红.发展生态友好型经济的路径选择[N].吉林日报,2014-02-17(08).
[9] 李永友.经济波动对经济增长的减损效应:中国的经验证据[J].当代经济科学,2006(4):8-13.
[10] 孙宗杨,王庆石.通货膨胀对经济增长的影响及途径研究[J].东北财经大学学报,2013(3):49-54.
[11] 冯柏.货币供给与经济增长和通货膨胀关系研究——基于我国改革开放以来的SVAR模型实证检验[J].中国物价,2016(6):3-5.
[12] 马珊珊.城镇化对经济增长的促进机制研究[J].山西农经,2018(16):30-31.
[13] 王喜文.中国制造2025[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2015:150-151.