论《商标法》第19条第4款的解析及商标代理机构权利的保护
|
摘要
我国《商标法》第19条第4款的最初立法目的与文义解释的结论存在冲突,如何理解尚无定论,对该条款如何解释涉及商标代理机构能否为自用而申请商标注册的问题。坚持文义解释优先符合法律解释的原则,也能间接维护此条款背后的立法目的,而对于商标代理机构如何维护其商标权利的问题,按照其商标驰名程度大小有不同的保护路径,从《商标法》和《反不正当竞争法》中可以找到解决的答案。
The original legislative purpose of Article 19(4) of the Trademark Law conflicts with the conclusion of the interpretation of the meaning of the text. The problem of how to understand the conclusion is not conclusive. The explanation of the article involves the problem whether the trademark agency can apply for trademark registration for personal use. Adhering to the principle that the interpretation of the meaning of the text is in accordance with the principle of legal interpretation can also indirectly safeguard the original legislative purpose. The protection paths of the issue of how the trademark agency maintains its trademark rights, according to the degree of its trademark republication, can be found in the Trademark Law and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law.
The original legislative purpose of Article 19(4) of the Trademark Law conflicts with the conclusion of the interpretation of the meaning of the text. The problem of how to understand the conclusion is not conclusive. The explanation of the article involves the problem whether the trademark agency can apply for trademark registration for personal use. Adhering to the principle that the interpretation of the meaning of the text is in accordance with the principle of legal interpretation can also indirectly safeguard the original legislative purpose. The protection paths of the issue of how the trademark agency maintains its trademark rights, according to the degree of its trademark republication, can be found in the Trademark Law and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law.
引文
[1]梁慧星.论法律解释方法[J].比较法研究,1993(1):47-64.
[2]陈奎.《商标审查及审理标准》(修订版)解读(下)[J].中华商标,2017(4):42-45.
[3]唐春,李旭颖.《商标法》第十九条第四款“申请注册”的解释及相关问题研究[J].知识产权,2016(3):99-104.
[4]王迁.知识产权法教程[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2017:524.
(1)《商标法》第4条规定,自然人、法人或者其他组织在生产经营活动中,对其商品或者服务需要取得商标专用权的,应当向商标局申请商标注册。本法有关商品商标的规定,适用于服务商标。
(1)参见北京知识产权法院行政判决书(2015)京知行初字第3418号、北京市高级人民法院行政判决书(2017)京行终3119号。
(2)《中华人民共和国商标法实施条例》第87条:“商标代理机构申请注册或者受让其代理服务以外的其他商标,商标局不予受理。”
(3)参见北京知识产权法院行政判决书(2016)京73行初608号、北京市高级人民法院行政判决书(2017)京行终1742号。
(1)《商标法》第32条规定:“申请商标注册不得损害他人现有的在先权利,也不得以不正当手段抢先注册他人已经使用并有一定影响的商标。”
[2]陈奎.《商标审查及审理标准》(修订版)解读(下)[J].中华商标,2017(4):42-45.
[3]唐春,李旭颖.《商标法》第十九条第四款“申请注册”的解释及相关问题研究[J].知识产权,2016(3):99-104.
[4]王迁.知识产权法教程[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2017:524.
(1)《商标法》第4条规定,自然人、法人或者其他组织在生产经营活动中,对其商品或者服务需要取得商标专用权的,应当向商标局申请商标注册。本法有关商品商标的规定,适用于服务商标。
(1)参见北京知识产权法院行政判决书(2015)京知行初字第3418号、北京市高级人民法院行政判决书(2017)京行终3119号。
(2)《中华人民共和国商标法实施条例》第87条:“商标代理机构申请注册或者受让其代理服务以外的其他商标,商标局不予受理。”
(3)参见北京知识产权法院行政判决书(2016)京73行初608号、北京市高级人民法院行政判决书(2017)京行终1742号。
(1)《商标法》第32条规定:“申请商标注册不得损害他人现有的在先权利,也不得以不正当手段抢先注册他人已经使用并有一定影响的商标。”