基于土地利用变化的红壤丘陵区生态系统服务价值分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Analysis of Ecosystem Service Value in Red Soil Hilly Region Based on Land Use Change
  • 作者:国家
  • 英文作者:GUO Jia;China Center for Special Economic Zone Research, Shenzhen University;
  • 关键词:红壤丘陵区 ; 生态系统服务价值 ; 土地利用变化 ; 灰色关联度分析
  • 英文关键词:red soil hilly;;region ecosystem service value;;land use change;;grey relational grade analysis
  • 中文刊名:STJJ
  • 英文刊名:Ecological Economy
  • 机构:深圳大学中国经济特区研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-01
  • 出版单位:生态经济
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.35;No.340
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:STJJ201904036
  • 页数:4
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:53-1193/F
  • 分类号:214-217
摘要
文章选取生态系统服务价值变差贡献率作为指标,研究2008—2017年间兴国县各土地利用变化对此指标的影响,结合灰色综合关联度,研究了其他4项指标对生态系统服务价值的贡献程度。研究结果显示,生态系统服务价值的降低主要是由林地面积减小引起的,由于市场需求增长和政府政策鼓励等原因,园地面积不断增长,成为仅次于林地面积的影响因素。不同研究时期内,总人口数、城镇化水平、第一产业占比与社会固定资产投资4项经济指标与生态服务价值的关联度有所差异,其中,前3项指标与生态系统服务价值高度关联,但是随着时间的推移,各指标对生态系统服务价值的影响差异逐渐减小,仅第一产业占比与生态服务价值呈正相关,其他3个指标均呈负相关。
        This paper selects the contribution rate of ecosystem service value variation as an indicator to study the impact of land use change on this indicator in Xingguo County from 2008 to 2017, and studies the contribution of other four indicators to ecosystem service value by combining with the grey comprehensive correlation degree. The results show that the decrease of ecosystem service value is mainly caused by the decrease of forest land area. Due to the increase of market demand and government policy encouragement, the garden area has been growing continuously, which is second only to the forest land area.In different research periods, the total population, urbanization level, the proportion of the primary industry and the four economic indicators of social fixed asset investment have different degrees of correlation with the value of ecological services, of which the first three indicators are highly correlated with the value of ecological services. However, with the passage of time, the differences in the impact of each indicator on the value of ecological services gradually decrease, with only the proportion of the primary industry positively correlated with the value of ecological services, while the other three indicators are negatively correlated.
引文
[1]Wilson C L,Matthews W H.Man’s impact on the global environment:Assessment and recommendations for action[R].Cambridge:MIT Press,1970.
    [2]Schulze E D,Mooney H A.Biodiversity and ecosystem function[M].Berlin:Springer,1993.
    [3]Costanza R,d’Arge R,de Groot R,et al.The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387(6630):253-260.
    [4]高志强,刘纪远,庄大方.基于遥感和GIS的中国土地利用/土地覆盖的现状研究[J].遥感学报,1999(2):134-138.
    [5]郭林.广东佛山市土地利用格局与生态承载力相关性研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2007(5):193-196.
    [6]欧阳志云,王如松,赵景柱.生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].应用生态学报,1999(5):635-640.
    [7]陈仲新,张新时.中国生态系统效益的价值[J].科学通报,2000(1):17-22.
    [8]谢高地,鲁春霞,肖玉,等.青藏高原高寒草地生态系统服务价值评估[J].山地学报,2003(1):50-55.
    [9]余新晓,秦永胜,陈丽华,等.北京山地森林生态系统服务功能及其价值初步研究[J].生态学报,2002(5):783-786.
    [10]余新晓,鲁绍伟,靳芳,等.中国森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].生态学报,2005(8):2096-2102.
    [11]彭皓.生态系统服务功能价值评估--以锡林河流域天然草地生态系统为例[D].北京:中国科学院植物研究所,2007.
    [12]姚成胜,朱鹤健,吕晞,等.土地利用变化的社会经济驱动因子对福建生态系统服务价值的影响[J].自然资源学报,2009(2):225-233.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700