摘要
采用层次分析法(AHP)对西安地区栽培的30个杜鹃花(Rhododendron simsii Planch.)品种进行综合评价。根据选定指标的评价结果,将30个品种分为4个等级:一级(≥4.75分),共4个品种;二级(4.00~4.50分),共10个品种;三级(3.50~3.75分),共11个品种;四级(<3.50分),共5个品种。综合评价结果与杜鹃花实际种植性能相一致,为西安杜鹃花品种选育和应用提供了科学依据。
A comprehensive analysis of thirty azalea(Rhododendron simsii Planch.) varieties cultivated in Xi'an area was carried out by means of analytic hierarchy process(AHP). According to the evaluation results of the selected indicators, thirty varieties were divided into 4 levels as follows. Level 1(≥4.75 points), a total of four varieties; Level 2(4.00~4.50 points),a total of ten varieties; Level 3(3.50~3.75 points), a total of eleven varieties; Level 4(<3.50 points), a total of five varieties. The comprehensive evaluation results are consistent with the actual planting performance of Rhododendron, which provides a scientific basis for the breeding and application of Rhododendron varieties in Xi'an city.
引文
[1]杨成华,李贵远,邓伦秀,等.贵州百里杜鹃保护区的杜鹃属植物种类及其观赏特性研究[J].西部林业科学,2006,35(4):14-18,39.
[2]鲍沁星,陈楚文.观赏果树在浙江城市园林造景中的应用[J].浙江农业学报,2009,21(4):385-389.
[3]张佳佳,白新祥,谢伟,等.层次分析法在贵阳市行道树选择评价中的应用[J].山地农业生物学报,2014,33(2):27-32
[4]李团结,李淑娟,杨玉惠,等.关中地区春季色叶植物观赏性评价[J].西北林学院学报,2014,29(6):255-259.
[5]冯敏敏.基于AHP-模糊综合评价模型的园林植物景观美感评价[J].杭州师范学院学报(自然科学版),2007,6(5):373-378.
[6]芦艳,樊保国,鲁周民.果树的园林观赏性灰色综合评价[J].西北林学院学报,2014,29(2):248-251.
[7]周满宏.甘肃杜鹃花属野生观赏植物资源评价及利用[J].中国林副特产,2000(3):62-63.
[8]孙海群,杨元武,李长慧,等.青海杜鹃花种质资源及分布[J].青海大学学报(自然科学版),1998(4):35-39.
[9]梁甲平.北方果树在城市园林绿化中存在的问题及对策[J].山西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2011,25(12):50-52.
[10]郑维列,潘刚,徐阿生,等.西藏色季拉山杜鹃花种质资源的初步研究[J].园艺学报,1995,22(2):166-170.
[11]阎开屏.杜鹃花的观赏价值和园林绿化中的应用[J].中国-东盟博览,2012(5):180-181.