公益诉讼制度框架下的行政违法行为检察监督探索
|
摘要
行政公益诉讼制度试行、正式实施三年来取得了一定的成效。从线索发现、立案、调查核实证据、分析研判到提起公益诉讼(或不起诉)的各个环节都值得研究。经过调研,课题组发现,惠州市两级检察院形成了一定的办案模式,初步建立有惠州特色的行政公益诉讼工作制度体系,增强了诉前检察建议落实程度。存在的主要问题是:案件线索渠道单一,调查核实证据存在一定难度,提起公益诉讼的立案、起诉标准不统一,检察建议的效能和刚性有待进一步提高,人员素质、专业化水平有待提高。针对这些问题,课题组提出了相应的建议。
Administrative public interest litigation has achieved considerable results in trial in the three years. All these are worth studying,clue discovery,case filing,investigation and verification of evidence,analysis and judgment to public interest litigation(or nonprosecution). After investigation,the research group found that the two levels of procuratorates in Huizhou have formed a certain clue search model and three-dimensional case handling model,initially established a system of administrative public interest litigation with Huizhou characteristics,and enhanced the implementation of pre-litigation procuratorial recommendations. The main problems are:single case clue channel,difficulty in investigating and verifying evidence,inconsistent standards for filing public interest litigation and prosecution,the effectiveness of procuratorial recommendations to be further improved,and the quality and professionalism of personnel to be improved. In response to these problems,the research group put forward corresponding suggestions.
Administrative public interest litigation has achieved considerable results in trial in the three years. All these are worth studying,clue discovery,case filing,investigation and verification of evidence,analysis and judgment to public interest litigation(or nonprosecution). After investigation,the research group found that the two levels of procuratorates in Huizhou have formed a certain clue search model and three-dimensional case handling model,initially established a system of administrative public interest litigation with Huizhou characteristics,and enhanced the implementation of pre-litigation procuratorial recommendations. The main problems are:single case clue channel,difficulty in investigating and verifying evidence,inconsistent standards for filing public interest litigation and prosecution,the effectiveness of procuratorial recommendations to be further improved,and the quality and professionalism of personnel to be improved. In response to these problems,the research group put forward corresponding suggestions.
引文
[1]谢玉美,刘为勇.行政违法行为检察监督程序论[J].行政法学研究,2017(1):43.
[2]曹建明.最高人民检察院工作报告——2018年3月9日在第十三届全国人民代表大会第一次会议上[EB/OL].[2018-10-25]. http://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/gzbg/201803/t20180325_372171.shtml(2018-09-21).
[3]温建军.行政公益诉讼应切实强化诉前检察建议[N].检察日报,2018-07-01(3).
(1)截至2016年底,广东省全省检察机关共在履行职责中发现公益诉讼案件线索933条,发出诉前检察建议共334件,提请公益诉讼共51件。绝大部分案件通过诉前程序得到解决,少部分案件以向法院提起诉讼作为最后解决的途径。行政机关在收到检察建议后一个月期限内及时回复、积极整改的共245件,占比达82.5%。试点以来,全省办理行政诉前程序案件312件,提起行政公益诉讼共45件,占全部起诉案件的近90%。见占文平、韦磊:《我省在全国率先完成相关领域试点改革任务,公益诉讼九成被告为行政机关》,2017年1月13日《南方日报》第A08版。
[2]曹建明.最高人民检察院工作报告——2018年3月9日在第十三届全国人民代表大会第一次会议上[EB/OL].[2018-10-25]. http://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/gzbg/201803/t20180325_372171.shtml(2018-09-21).
[3]温建军.行政公益诉讼应切实强化诉前检察建议[N].检察日报,2018-07-01(3).
(1)截至2016年底,广东省全省检察机关共在履行职责中发现公益诉讼案件线索933条,发出诉前检察建议共334件,提请公益诉讼共51件。绝大部分案件通过诉前程序得到解决,少部分案件以向法院提起诉讼作为最后解决的途径。行政机关在收到检察建议后一个月期限内及时回复、积极整改的共245件,占比达82.5%。试点以来,全省办理行政诉前程序案件312件,提起行政公益诉讼共45件,占全部起诉案件的近90%。见占文平、韦磊:《我省在全国率先完成相关领域试点改革任务,公益诉讼九成被告为行政机关》,2017年1月13日《南方日报》第A08版。