古汉山矿二_1煤层渗透性优势方位及对瓦斯抽采的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Dominant Permeability Direction and Its Influence on Gas Drainage of Ⅱ_1 Coal Seam in Guhanshan Coal Mine
  • 作者:关金锋 ; 王永周 ; 马静驰 ; 崔洪庆
  • 英文作者:GUAN Jinfeng;WANG Yongzhou;MA Jingchi;CUI Hongqing;College of Mining Engineering, Guizhou University of Engineering Science;Guhanshan Coal Mine of Henan Jiaozuo Coal Company Industry Group;School of Safety Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University;
  • 关键词:安全工程 ; 煤层裂隙 ; 煤层渗透性优势方位 ; 现场测试 ; 瓦斯抽采
  • 英文关键词:safety engineering;;coal seam fracture;;dominant position of coal seam permeability;;field test;;gas drainage
  • 中文刊名:MKAQ
  • 英文刊名:Safety in Coal Mines
  • 机构:贵州工程应用技术学院矿业工程学院;河南焦煤能源有限公司古汉山矿;河南理工大学安全科学与工程学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-20
  • 出版单位:煤矿安全
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.50;No.540
  • 基金:贵州省科技计划资助项目(黔科合LH字[2017]7006号);; 贵州省教育厅青年科技人才成长资助项目(黔教合KY字[2017]303,黔教合KY字[2017]296);; 贵州省重点学科资助项目(ZDXK[2016]13)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:MKAQ201906046
  • 页数:4
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:21-1232/TD
  • 分类号:191-193+197
摘要
通过对古汉山矿二1煤层裂隙观测统计,分析了煤层裂隙开启、闭合特征,矿井东区N50°E走向裂隙组受地应力相对拉张作用,矿井西区N30°E走向裂隙组受地应力相对拉张作用,预测矿井东区、西区煤层渗透性优势方位分别为N50°E、N30°E。矿井西区煤层渗透率现场测试表明,沿N55°W方向测试钻孔渗透率数值均远大于其它方向,煤层渗透性优势分布方位为N35°E,现场测试结果与煤层渗透性优势方位预测基本一致。鉴于二1煤层渗透性分布特征,探讨了水力压裂、酸化煤层等措施对煤层渗透性的影响,提出了矿井瓦斯最优瓦斯抽采方案,即东区瓦斯抽采钻孔设计应与N50°E向垂直、西区瓦斯抽采钻孔设计应与N35°E向垂直。
        Through the observation statistics of Guhanshan Coal Mine coal seam fractures, the coal fracture opening and closing control features is analyzed, eastern gas geological unit N50° E to fracture group affected by in situ stress relative tension, the western gas geological unit N30° E to fracture affected by the relative stress and tension in and prediction of mine gas geology units of the eastern, the western gas geological unit of coal seam permeability advantage range is N50° E, N30° E, respectively.Field test results show that the coal seam permeability presents anisotropic distribution, along the N55° W direction, the measurement of borehole permeability value is far greater than in the other direction, the advantage distribution range of coal seam permeability is N35°E, the results of field tests and coal seam permeability advantage range prediction is consistent. In view of the permeability distribution characteristics of Ⅱ_1 coal seam, the influence of hydraulic fracturing, acidizing coal seam and other measures on the permeability of coal seam is discussed. The optimal gas mine gas extraction solution is proposed, namely, eastern gas drainage by drilling design should be vertical to N50°E, and western gas drainage by drilling design should be vertical to the N35°E.
引文
[1]Levine J R.Model study of the influence of matrix shrinkage on absolute permeability of coal bed reservoirs[J].Geological Society London Special Publications,1996,109(1):197-212.
    [2]陈金刚,秦勇,宋全友,等.割理方向与煤层气抽放效果的关系及预测模型[J].中国矿业大学学报,2003,32(3):223-226.
    [3]陈金刚,宋全友,秦勇.煤层割理在煤层气开发中的试验研究[J].煤田地质与勘探,2002,30(2):26-28.
    [4]苏生瑞.构造地质学[M].北京:地质出版社,2011.
    [5]秦勇,张德民,傅雪海,等.山西沁水盆地中、南部现代构造应力场与煤储层物性关系之探讨[J].地质论评,1999(6):576-583.
    [6]倪小明.煤层气开发地质学[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2010.
    [7]李志伟.古汉山井田煤层气产出机理及可采性综合评价[D].焦作:河南理工大学,2012.
    [8]李宪振.古汉山矿高应力巷道围岩稳定性与支护技术研究[D].焦作:河南理工大学,2009.
    [9]张占存.压力恢复曲线测定煤层瓦斯赋存参数的试验研究[J].煤炭学报,2012,37(8):1310-1314.
    [10]苏理波.煤矿井下水力强化理论与技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2014.
    [11]倪小明,李全中,王延斌,等.多组分酸对不同煤阶煤储层化学增透实验研究[J].煤炭学报,2014(S2):436-440

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700