产学研合作中的主体差异性对知识转移的影响研究
|
摘要
本研究从主体差异性的不同维度的角度,深入分析了不同合作主体差异性对学习意愿和吸收能力对知识转移直接效应的调节作用。通过对211家参与产学研合作的企业调查数据进行统计分析,结果表明,产学研合作主体目标差异对于学习意愿和吸收能力与知识转移之间的关系存在负向调节效应,主体合作目标差异程度越大,企业学习意愿和吸收能力对知识转移的促进作用越低;合作主体知识技术差异对吸收能力与知识转移的关系具有显著的倒U型影响,高程度的知识技术差异减弱吸收能力对知识转移的影响,而知识技术差异程度过低也将负向调节吸收能力对知识转移的影响。基于以上研究结果,本文提出了一系列的管理启示。
This study analyzes in depth the moderating of the different dimensions of partners difference between learning will/absorptive capacity and knowledge transfer. Through the statistical analysis of the survey data of 211 enterprises involved in UI collaboration.The empirical result shows that there are negative moderating effects on the relationship between learning willingness and absorptive ability and knowledge transfer. The difference of cooperation objectives is more The lower learning willingness and the absorptive capacity of enterprises to promote knowledge transfer; the difference of knowledge and technology has a significant inverted U effect on the relationship between absorptive capacity and knowledge transfer; the high degree of knowledge and technology difference weakens the capacity of knowledge transfer The impact of knowledge transfer will be negatively affected by the low level of knowledge and technology difference. Based on the above findings,some management implications are proposed.
This study analyzes in depth the moderating of the different dimensions of partners difference between learning will/absorptive capacity and knowledge transfer. Through the statistical analysis of the survey data of 211 enterprises involved in UI collaboration.The empirical result shows that there are negative moderating effects on the relationship between learning willingness and absorptive ability and knowledge transfer. The difference of cooperation objectives is more The lower learning willingness and the absorptive capacity of enterprises to promote knowledge transfer; the difference of knowledge and technology has a significant inverted U effect on the relationship between absorptive capacity and knowledge transfer; the high degree of knowledge and technology difference weakens the capacity of knowledge transfer The impact of knowledge transfer will be negatively affected by the low level of knowledge and technology difference. Based on the above findings,some management implications are proposed.
引文
[1]何郁冰.产学研协同创新的理论模式[J].科学学研究,2012,30(2):165-174.
[2]肖丁丁,朱桂龙.跨界搜寻对组织双元能力影响的实证研究——基于创新能力结构视角[J].科学学研究,2016,34(7):1076-1085.
[3]任浩,甄杰.管理学百年演进与创新:组织间关系的视角[J].中国工业经济,2012,(12):89-101.
[4]曹霞,于娟.联盟伙伴视角下产学研联盟稳定性提升路径——理论框架与实证分析[J].科学学研究,2016,34(10):1522-1531.
[5]倪渊,张健.协同知识管理实践的影响因素及作用效果[J].科学学研究,2015,33(11):1687-1699.
[6] Gupta A K,Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2015,21(4):473-496.
[7] Li J H,Chang X R,Lin L,et al. Meta-analytic comparison on the influencing factors of knowledge transfer in different cultural contexts[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management,2014,18(2):278-306.
[8] Alia M,Park K. The mediating role of an innovative culture in the relationship between absorptive capacity and technical and non-technical innovation[J]. Journal Of Business Research,2016,69(5):1669-1675.
[9]刘学元,丁雯婧,赵先德.企业创新网络中关系强度、吸收能力与创新绩效的关系研究[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(1):30-42.
[10]熊捷,孙道银.企业社会资本、技术知识获取与产品创新绩效关系研究[J].管理评论,2017,29(5):23-39.
[11]叶江峰,任浩,郝斌.企业内外部知识异质度对创新绩效的影响——战略柔性的调节作用[J].科学学研究,2015,33(4):574-584.
[12]米捷,林润辉,董坤祥,等. OFDI企业与本土集群企业知识共享的演化博弈分析——基于知识位势的视角[J].管理评论,2016,28(9):106-120.
[13]周密,赵文红,宋红媛.基于知识特性的知识距离对知识转移影响研究[J].科学学研究,2015,33(7):1059-1068.
[14] Perkmann M,King Z,Pavelin S. Engaging excellence?effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry[J]. Research Policy,2011,40(4):539-552.
[15] Laursen K,Salter A. Searching high and low:What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?[J]. Research Policy,2004,33(8):1201-1215.
[16]徐欣.技术升级投资与产品成本优势效应的实证研究——基于产品技术生命周期与工艺创新的视角[J].科研管理,2013,34(8):82-89.
[17]邹国平,刘洪德,王广益.我国国有企业规模与研发强度相关性研究[J].管理评论,2015,27(12):171-179.
[18]胡冬雪,陈强.促进我国产学研合作的法律对策研究[J].中国软科学,2013,(2):154-174.
[2]肖丁丁,朱桂龙.跨界搜寻对组织双元能力影响的实证研究——基于创新能力结构视角[J].科学学研究,2016,34(7):1076-1085.
[3]任浩,甄杰.管理学百年演进与创新:组织间关系的视角[J].中国工业经济,2012,(12):89-101.
[4]曹霞,于娟.联盟伙伴视角下产学研联盟稳定性提升路径——理论框架与实证分析[J].科学学研究,2016,34(10):1522-1531.
[5]倪渊,张健.协同知识管理实践的影响因素及作用效果[J].科学学研究,2015,33(11):1687-1699.
[6] Gupta A K,Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2015,21(4):473-496.
[7] Li J H,Chang X R,Lin L,et al. Meta-analytic comparison on the influencing factors of knowledge transfer in different cultural contexts[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management,2014,18(2):278-306.
[8] Alia M,Park K. The mediating role of an innovative culture in the relationship between absorptive capacity and technical and non-technical innovation[J]. Journal Of Business Research,2016,69(5):1669-1675.
[9]刘学元,丁雯婧,赵先德.企业创新网络中关系强度、吸收能力与创新绩效的关系研究[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(1):30-42.
[10]熊捷,孙道银.企业社会资本、技术知识获取与产品创新绩效关系研究[J].管理评论,2017,29(5):23-39.
[11]叶江峰,任浩,郝斌.企业内外部知识异质度对创新绩效的影响——战略柔性的调节作用[J].科学学研究,2015,33(4):574-584.
[12]米捷,林润辉,董坤祥,等. OFDI企业与本土集群企业知识共享的演化博弈分析——基于知识位势的视角[J].管理评论,2016,28(9):106-120.
[13]周密,赵文红,宋红媛.基于知识特性的知识距离对知识转移影响研究[J].科学学研究,2015,33(7):1059-1068.
[14] Perkmann M,King Z,Pavelin S. Engaging excellence?effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry[J]. Research Policy,2011,40(4):539-552.
[15] Laursen K,Salter A. Searching high and low:What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?[J]. Research Policy,2004,33(8):1201-1215.
[16]徐欣.技术升级投资与产品成本优势效应的实证研究——基于产品技术生命周期与工艺创新的视角[J].科研管理,2013,34(8):82-89.
[17]邹国平,刘洪德,王广益.我国国有企业规模与研发强度相关性研究[J].管理评论,2015,27(12):171-179.
[18]胡冬雪,陈强.促进我国产学研合作的法律对策研究[J].中国软科学,2013,(2):154-174.