分散式MPC经济性能评估
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Economic Performance Assessment of Decentralized Model Predictive Control
  • 作者:刘苏 ; 冯毅萍 ; 荣冈
  • 英文作者:LIU Su 1 FENG Yi-Ping 1 RONG Gang 1 1.State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology,Institute of Cyber-System and Control,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310027
  • 关键词:模型预测控制 ; 经济性能评估 ; 分散式控制 ; 线性二次型调节器 ; 线性矩阵不等式
  • 英文关键词:Model predictive control(MPC),economic performance assessment,decentralized control,linear quadratic regulator(LQR),linear matrix inequality(LMI)
  • 中文刊名:MOTO
  • 英文刊名:Acta Automatica Sinica
  • 机构:浙江大学工业控制技术国家重点实验室智能系统与控制研究所;
  • 出版日期:2012-12-04 11:15
  • 出版单位:自动化学报
  • 年:2013
  • 期:v.39
  • 基金:国家基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2012CB720500);; 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)(2012BAE05B03)资助~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:MOTO201305011
  • 页数:8
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:11-2109/TP
  • 分类号:82-89
摘要
近年来,学术界对集中式模型预测控制(Model predictive control,MPC)性能评估进行了广泛的研究.对于大规模化工过程,工业现场通常采用分散式MPC的控制结构.由于各子系统间存在复杂的耦合关系,针对集中式MPC的性能评估方法不能客观反映分散式MPC的性能.本文基于线性矩阵不等式(Linear matrix inequality,LMI)的方法对分散式MPC进行经济性能评估.首先提出了一种迭代方法求解分散式线性二次型调节器(Linear quadratic regulator,LQR)问题,该方法显著降低了已有求解方法的保守性.再利用LQR基准建立了一组随机优化命题对MPC进行经济性能评估,评估方法对集中式MPC与分散式MPC均适用,评估结果可以指导MPC参数调整,也可以为集中式与分散式MPC结构选择提供重要参考.通过对重油分馏塔控制问题的仿真验证了本文方法的有效性与应用价值.
        In recent years,performance assessment of centralized model predictive control(MPC) has attracted a lot of academic interest.In fact,large-scale complex chemical processes are usually controlled by decentralized MPC in the industrial field.Due to the complex interactions between subsystems,most performance assessment methods regarding centralized control structure cannot be applied to the performance assessment of decentralized MPC.In this paper,a linear matrix inequality(LMI) based approach is proposed to assess the economic performance of decentralized MPC.First,an iterative method is proposed to obtain the decentralized linear quadratic regulator(LQR) benchmark.A probabilistic optimization problem is then formulated to assess the economic performance of MPC.The proposed approach can be applied to assessment of both centralized MPC and decentralized MPC.The assessment result provides guidance for parameter tuning as well as control structure selection.The simulation result of Shell control problem shows the effectiveness of the proposed method.
引文
1Cui H,Jacobsen E W.Performance limitations in decentral-ized control.Journal of Process Control,2002,12(4):485-494
    2Scattolini R.Architectures for distributed and hierarchical model predictive control—a review.Journal of Process Control,2009,19(5):723-731
    3Stewart B T,Venkat A N,Rawlings J B,Wright S J,Pan-nocchia G.Cooperative distributed model predictive con-trol.Systems&Control Letters,2010,59(8):460-469
    4Harris T J.Assessment of control loop performance.The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering,1989,67(5):856-861
    5Huang B,Kadali R.Dynamic Modeling,Predictive Control and Performance Monitoring:A Data-driven Subspace Ap-proach.Vol.374.New York:Springer Verlag,2008
    6Gao J P,Patwardhan R,Akamatsu K,Hashimoto Y,Emoto G,Shah S L,Huang B.Performance evaluation of two indus-trial MPC controllers.Control Engineering Practice,2003,11(12):1371-1387
    7Yang M Y,Jin X M,Chen F.Performance assessment of model predictive control in industrial distillation column.In:Proceedings of the5th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.Hangzhou,China:IEEE,2004.637-641
    8Huang B,Shah S L.Performance Assessment of Control Loops:Theory and Applications.New York:Springer Ver-lag,1999
    9Shah S L,Patwardhan R,Huang B.Multivariate controller performance analysis:methods,applications and challenges.AIChE Symposium Series,New York,USA,2002.190-207
    10Shah S L,Mitchell W,Shook D.Challenges in the detection,diagnosis and visualisation of controller performance data.Computing and Control Engineering Journal,2005,16(4):30-34
    11Patwardhan R S,Shah S L,Qi K Z.Assessing the perfor-mance of model predictive controllers.The Canadian Jour-nal of Chemical Engineering,2002,80(5):954-966
    12Jain M,Lakshminarayanan S.Estimating performance enhancement with alternate control strategies for multi-loop control systems.Chemical Engineering Science,2007,62(17):4644-4658
    13Kariwala V,Forbes J F,Meadows E S.Minimum variance benchmark for decentralized controllers.In:Proceedings of the2005American Control Conference.Portland,OR,USA:IEEE,2005.1437-1442
    14Kariwala V.Fundamental limitation on achievable decen-tralized performance.Automatica,2007,43(10):1849-1854
    15De Oliveira M C,Geromel J C,Bernussou J.Extended H2and H∞norm characterizations and controller parametriza-tions for discrete-time systems.International Journal of Control,2002,75(9):666-679
    16Geromel J C,Peres P L D.Decentralized load-frequency control.IEE Proceedings D(Control Theory and Applica-tions),1985,132(5):225-230
    17Geromel J C,Bernussou J,Peres P L D.Decentralized control through parameter space optimization.Automatica,1994,30(10):1565-1578
    18Zhao C,Zhao Y,Su H Y,Huang B.Economic performance assessment of advanced process control with LQG bench-marking.Journal of Process Control,2009,19(4):557-569
    19Zhao C,Su H Y,Gu Y,Chu J.A pragmatic approach for assessing the economic performance of model predictive con-trol systems and its industrial application.Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering,2009,17(2):241-250
    20Xu Q L,Zhao C,Zhang D F,An A M,Zhang C.Data-driven LQG benchmarking for economic performance assess-ment of advanced process control system.In:Proceedings of the2011American Control Conference.San Francisco,CA,USA:AACC,2011.5085-5090
    21Xu F W,Huang B,Akande S.Performance assessment of model predictive control for variability and constraint tun-ing.Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research,2007,46(4):1208-1219
    22Ying,C M,Joseph B.Performance and stability analysis of LP-MPC and QP-MPC cascade control systems.AIChE Journal,1999,45(7):1521-1534

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700