个体优势导向的外智引联型创新团队构建
|
摘要
外智引联型创新团队是解决人才短缺的一种跨区域人才"软引进"方式,当前研究在西部的高校及科研机构如何构建创新团队方面存在理论缺口。以成员个体特点和优势为切入点,根据个人构念理论,采用凯利方格技术提炼选拔评价指标;以竞优思想为指导,运用个体优势判别方法,据此构建创新团队成员选拔模型,结合具体实例进行验证。研究显示,在认同个体差异前提下,识别出的评价指标突出成员的个性化特征,明确成员个体关注的重点;指标的价值参数为个体优势量化表现形式,在发挥成员个体优势基础上构建创新团队,实现优势互补,符合多主体、跨区域、操作灵活的外智引联型创新团队特点。依据研究结论,从识别个性化特征与发挥个体优势两个角度对西部的高校及科研机构如何构建优势团队给出管理启示。
Intelligence alliance type innovation team is a kind of soft introduction to solve the shortage of talents,while the current research has done insufficiently for western universities and institutions in how to build an innovative group. In this paper,evaluation indicators are identified by using Kelly's Repertory Grid method based on the personal constructivism theory. And the construction model was built by individual advantage identifying method from the theory of conforming to better actions. Finally an empirical case is taken to certify the method. The research shows that under the premise of recognizing individuals' differences,the identified appraisal indicators highlight the individual characteristics of members and clarify the focus of individual members' attention. The value parameters of indicators are quantitative manifestation of individual advantages,and based on the advantages of individual members building an innovation team is to achieve the strengths of each other,which is in line with multi-agent,cross-regional,flexible operation of foreign-led inductive innovation team characteristics. According to the conclusion of the study,this paper gives the management enlightenment to the universities and research institutes in western China from the angle of identifying individual characteristics and making the individuals play to full strengths.
Intelligence alliance type innovation team is a kind of soft introduction to solve the shortage of talents,while the current research has done insufficiently for western universities and institutions in how to build an innovative group. In this paper,evaluation indicators are identified by using Kelly's Repertory Grid method based on the personal constructivism theory. And the construction model was built by individual advantage identifying method from the theory of conforming to better actions. Finally an empirical case is taken to certify the method. The research shows that under the premise of recognizing individuals' differences,the identified appraisal indicators highlight the individual characteristics of members and clarify the focus of individual members' attention. The value parameters of indicators are quantitative manifestation of individual advantages,and based on the advantages of individual members building an innovation team is to achieve the strengths of each other,which is in line with multi-agent,cross-regional,flexible operation of foreign-led inductive innovation team characteristics. According to the conclusion of the study,this paper gives the management enlightenment to the universities and research institutes in western China from the angle of identifying individual characteristics and making the individuals play to full strengths.
引文
[1]王海军.面向开放式协同创新的合作伙伴能力评价研究[J].科学学研究,2017,35(11):1726-1736.
[2]段万春,曹勤伟,杜凤娇.外智引联型创新团队研究述评与发展动态分析[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(10):154-160.
[3] Kanama D,Nishikawa K. What type of obstacles in innovation activities make firms access university knowledge? An empirical study of the use of university knowledge on innovation outcomes[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer,2015,42(12):1-17.
[4]管建世,罗瑾琏,钟竞.动态环境下双元领导对团队创造力影响研究——基于团队目标取向视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(8):159-169.
[5]倪渊,张健,等.协同知识管理实践的影响因素及作用效果[J].科学学研究,2015,33(11):1687-1699.
[6]袁华,刘耘,钱宇,等.基于合作网络的虚拟企业伙伴选择研究[J].管理工程学报,2016,30(1):80-87.
[7] Sadigh B L,Nikghadam S,Ozbayoglu A M,et al. An ontology-based multi-agent virtual enterprise system(OMAVE):part 2:partner selection[J]. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing,2017,30(10):1-21.
[8] Huang S T,Zhao X N,Chang S,et al. Organizational construction of a new type of university scientific research team based on jingyou thought[J]. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,Science and Technology Education,2017,13(8):5615-5627.
[9] Nikghadam S,Sadigh B L,Ozbayoglu A M,et al. A survey of partner selection methodologies for virtual enterprises and development of a goal programming-based approach[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2016,85(11):1713-1734.
[10] Crispim J,Rego N,Sousa J P D. Stochastic partner selection for virtual enterprises:A chance-constrained approach[J]. International Journal of Production Research,2015,53(12):3661-3677.
[11]姚升保.产业技术创新联盟伙伴选择的模糊组合决策方法[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(1):194-200.
[12]杨锴,赵希男.基于层次结构的多标杆选拔竞优评价方法[J].技术经济,2017,36(8):128-134.
[13]段万春,杜凤娇,李阳.外智引联型创新团队成员优选方法探索[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(10):118-123.
[14] Kelly G A. A theory of Personality:The Psychology of Personal Constructs[M]. NY:Rutledge Press,1963.
[15] Luis Angel Saúl,M. Angeles López-González,Alexis Moreno-Pulido,et al. Bibliometric review of the repertory grid technique:1998-2007[J]. Journal of Constructivist Psychology,2012,25(2):112-131.
[16] Peng B,Kojima T. A comparable interpretability study between evaluation grid method,repertory grid method and typical free description:A study on qualitative research for getting evaluation term[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering,2016,81(7):661-668.
[17] Steinberg F,Tursch P,Woll R. The improvement of kansei engineering by using the repertory grid technique[J]. Management&Production Engineering Review,2015,6(3):77-82.
[18] Ginsberg A. Construing the business portfolio:A cognitive model of diversification[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2010,26(4):417-438.
[19] Catalano D C J. Resisting coherence:Trans men’s experiences and the use of grounded theory methods[J].International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,2017,30(3):234-244.
[20]赵希男,朱春红,王艳梅,等.竞优评析理论方法与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2012:6-10.
[21]赵希男,褚德海,王飞.论竞优及其管理[J].管理学报,2012,9(4):492-498.
[22]柳森,贾建锋.高新技术企业R&D人员绩效评价方法及实证研究——基于层次结构的个体优势特征识别视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(4):171-180.
[23] Ahmed Z,Ramakrishnan S,Noreen U. Financial literacy as competitive advantage for individual investors’decision making[J]. Journal of Computational&Theoretical Nanoscience,2017,23(9):8988-8993.
[2]段万春,曹勤伟,杜凤娇.外智引联型创新团队研究述评与发展动态分析[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(10):154-160.
[3] Kanama D,Nishikawa K. What type of obstacles in innovation activities make firms access university knowledge? An empirical study of the use of university knowledge on innovation outcomes[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer,2015,42(12):1-17.
[4]管建世,罗瑾琏,钟竞.动态环境下双元领导对团队创造力影响研究——基于团队目标取向视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(8):159-169.
[5]倪渊,张健,等.协同知识管理实践的影响因素及作用效果[J].科学学研究,2015,33(11):1687-1699.
[6]袁华,刘耘,钱宇,等.基于合作网络的虚拟企业伙伴选择研究[J].管理工程学报,2016,30(1):80-87.
[7] Sadigh B L,Nikghadam S,Ozbayoglu A M,et al. An ontology-based multi-agent virtual enterprise system(OMAVE):part 2:partner selection[J]. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing,2017,30(10):1-21.
[8] Huang S T,Zhao X N,Chang S,et al. Organizational construction of a new type of university scientific research team based on jingyou thought[J]. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,Science and Technology Education,2017,13(8):5615-5627.
[9] Nikghadam S,Sadigh B L,Ozbayoglu A M,et al. A survey of partner selection methodologies for virtual enterprises and development of a goal programming-based approach[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2016,85(11):1713-1734.
[10] Crispim J,Rego N,Sousa J P D. Stochastic partner selection for virtual enterprises:A chance-constrained approach[J]. International Journal of Production Research,2015,53(12):3661-3677.
[11]姚升保.产业技术创新联盟伙伴选择的模糊组合决策方法[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(1):194-200.
[12]杨锴,赵希男.基于层次结构的多标杆选拔竞优评价方法[J].技术经济,2017,36(8):128-134.
[13]段万春,杜凤娇,李阳.外智引联型创新团队成员优选方法探索[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(10):118-123.
[14] Kelly G A. A theory of Personality:The Psychology of Personal Constructs[M]. NY:Rutledge Press,1963.
[15] Luis Angel Saúl,M. Angeles López-González,Alexis Moreno-Pulido,et al. Bibliometric review of the repertory grid technique:1998-2007[J]. Journal of Constructivist Psychology,2012,25(2):112-131.
[16] Peng B,Kojima T. A comparable interpretability study between evaluation grid method,repertory grid method and typical free description:A study on qualitative research for getting evaluation term[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering,2016,81(7):661-668.
[17] Steinberg F,Tursch P,Woll R. The improvement of kansei engineering by using the repertory grid technique[J]. Management&Production Engineering Review,2015,6(3):77-82.
[18] Ginsberg A. Construing the business portfolio:A cognitive model of diversification[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2010,26(4):417-438.
[19] Catalano D C J. Resisting coherence:Trans men’s experiences and the use of grounded theory methods[J].International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,2017,30(3):234-244.
[20]赵希男,朱春红,王艳梅,等.竞优评析理论方法与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2012:6-10.
[21]赵希男,褚德海,王飞.论竞优及其管理[J].管理学报,2012,9(4):492-498.
[22]柳森,贾建锋.高新技术企业R&D人员绩效评价方法及实证研究——基于层次结构的个体优势特征识别视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(4):171-180.
[23] Ahmed Z,Ramakrishnan S,Noreen U. Financial literacy as competitive advantage for individual investors’decision making[J]. Journal of Computational&Theoretical Nanoscience,2017,23(9):8988-8993.