教师队伍中新老教师群体“缄默式”冲突的原因及解决途径
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The Causes and Solutions on “Silent” Confrontation between Old Teachers and New Teachers
  • 作者:肖百惠 ; 张秀峰
  • 英文作者:XIAO Baihui;ZHANG Xiufeng;Nanjing Normal University;Zoucheng NO.6 Middle School;
  • 关键词:教师队伍 ; 专业发展 ; 教师管理
  • 英文关键词:teacher troop;;professional development;;teacher management
  • 中文刊名:JLJK
  • 英文刊名:Modern Education Science
  • 机构:南京师范大学;山东省邹城市第六中学;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:现代教育科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:No.467
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:JLJK201902052
  • 页数:5
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:22-1339/G4
  • 分类号:115-119
摘要
新时代对教师专业发展提出新的要求,随着时代的变化,年轻教师的教育观念也随之发生变化。他们接受新的教育理念,培养新的专业发展观,使其成为学校骨干力量。但是老教师并非就在专业发展上不占优势,他们具有丰富的经验,且占有学校的管理职务。新、老教师各执自己的优势,有融合有冲突。然而,新老教师在地位上存在不平等。科层管理下,新教师迫于老教师的权威地位和权威文化的影响,对抗呈现"缄默式"。这种"缄默式"对抗的长期存在,使利益得不到满足的教师处于压抑之下,他们为寻求利益的满足会使用制造舆论、干扰决策层等不良手段,影响整个教师群体和学生的发展。有效化解新老教师之间的冲突有助于整个教师队伍专业发展,促进学校教学、管理功能的稳定运行。
        The new era puts forward new requirements for the professional development of teachers. They accept the new educational concept,cultivate the new professional development concept,and make them become the backbone of the school. However,old teachers are not disadvantaged in professional development. They have rich experience and occupy management positions in schools. New and old teachers each hold their own advantages,integration and conflict. However,the status of old and new teachers is unequal. Under the bureaucratic management,new teachers are forced by the authority status of old teachers and the influence of authority culture,and the confrontation shows "reticence". The existence of this "silent"confrontation for a long time makes the teachers who are not satisfied with their interests under repression. In order to seek the satisfaction of their interests,they will use bad means such as creating public opinion and interfering with the decision-making level to affect the development of the whole teacher group and students. Effectively resolving conflicts between old teachers and new teachers are conducive to the professional development of the whole teaching staff and the stable operation of school teaching and management functions.
引文
[1][德]马克思、恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集(第三卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1998:466.
    [2][德]科赛.社会冲突的功能[M].香港:华夏出版社,1989:20-26.
    [3]李伟.教师共同体中的知识共享:困境与突破[J].教育发展研究,2017(20).
    [4]欧阳修俊.“互联网+”教师专业发展的实践路径初探[J].当代教育与文化,2017(3):78-82.
    [5]杜占元.信息时代,谁走在前面,谁就是老师[EB/OL].http://www.aiweibang.com/yuedu/95558267.html.
    [6][美]韦恩K霍伊.教育管理学:理论、研究、实践(第七版)[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2007.
    [7]鲁洁、吴康宁.教育社会学[M].北京:人民教育出版社(第2版),2005.
    [8][法]米歇尔·福柯.规训与惩罚(修订版)[M].北京:人民出版社,生活·读书·新知三联书店,2003.
    [9]曲铁华,冯茁,陈瑞武:教师专业发展与高等师范院校课程改革[J].教育研究,2007(9).
    [10]胡惠闵.指向教师专业发展的学校管理改革:上海市打虎山路第一小学个案研究[D].华东师范大学,2003:20-22.
    [11]教育部师范教育司.教师专业化的理论与实行[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2003:27-32.
    [12]付光槐.基于不同价值旨趣的教师角色考证---兼议教师教育发展的价值取向[J].上海教育科研,2017(07):32-35.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700