氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎的临床护理效果分析
|
摘要
目的:探讨氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎患儿的疗效及护理措施。方法:选取2011年2月~2015年6月某院86例喘憋性肺炎的患儿,随机分为研究组和对照组,各43例。对照组给予氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗及常规护理,研究组在对照组基础上采用针对性护理干预,使用少儿生活质量问卷(ISLQ)评价生活质量,比较两组的临床症状、体征缓解时间、住院时间及生活质量评分的差异。结果:研究组患儿的气喘、咳嗽、哮鸣音等主要临床症状、体征缓解时间均较对照组短(P<0.05);研究组住院时间为(10.46±2.62)d,较对照组的(12.50±3.13)d短(P<0.05);治疗后,研究组的生活质量各项得分较对照组优(P<0.05)。结论:氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎效果突出,能有效缓解患儿的临床症状,在此基础上给予针对性护理干预措施,可显著增强临床疗效,改善生活质量,值得临床推广。
Objective:To explore the effect and nursing measures of oxygen-driven atomizing inhalation in the treatment of children with asthmatic pneumonia.Methods:86children with asthmatic pneumonia treated in a hospital from February 2011 to June 2015 were selected and randomly divided into study group and control group,with 43 cases in each group.The control group was treated with oxygen-driven atomizing inhalation therapy and routine nursing,and the study was given targeted nursing intervention on the basis of control group.The inventory of subjective life quality(islq)was used to evaluate of the quality of life,then compared the clinical symptoms,signs remission time,hospitalization time and quality of life score of two groups.Results:Children with the main clinical symptoms such as asthma,coughing,wheezing,and the signs remission time of study group were lower than those of control group(P<0.05);The length of hospitalization time of study group[(10.46±2.62)d]was shorter than that of control group [(12.50±3.13)d](P<0.05);The quality of life scores after treatment of study group was better than that of control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Oxygen-driven atomizing inhalation in the treatment of children with asthmatic pneumonia has outstanding effect,and can effectively alleviate the patients clinical symptoms.Based on the treatment,given targeted nursing intervention measures can significantly enhance the clinical curative effect,and improve the quality of life,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
Objective:To explore the effect and nursing measures of oxygen-driven atomizing inhalation in the treatment of children with asthmatic pneumonia.Methods:86children with asthmatic pneumonia treated in a hospital from February 2011 to June 2015 were selected and randomly divided into study group and control group,with 43 cases in each group.The control group was treated with oxygen-driven atomizing inhalation therapy and routine nursing,and the study was given targeted nursing intervention on the basis of control group.The inventory of subjective life quality(islq)was used to evaluate of the quality of life,then compared the clinical symptoms,signs remission time,hospitalization time and quality of life score of two groups.Results:Children with the main clinical symptoms such as asthma,coughing,wheezing,and the signs remission time of study group were lower than those of control group(P<0.05);The length of hospitalization time of study group[(10.46±2.62)d]was shorter than that of control group [(12.50±3.13)d](P<0.05);The quality of life scores after treatment of study group was better than that of control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Oxygen-driven atomizing inhalation in the treatment of children with asthmatic pneumonia has outstanding effect,and can effectively alleviate the patients clinical symptoms.Based on the treatment,given targeted nursing intervention measures can significantly enhance the clinical curative effect,and improve the quality of life,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
引文
1卢贤红.布地奈德联合沙丁胺醇氧驱动治疗喘憋性肺炎痰堵的临床护理观察.护士进修杂志,2014,29(15):1434~1435.
2 邓聪,邓朝晖,曾海生,等.小剂量甲强龙联合喘可治雾化吸入治疗喘憋性肺炎的疗效分析.齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2015,36(5):644~645.
3 田桂英.氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎的疗效观察及护理.护理实践与研究,2014,11(2):74~75.
4 侯红莉.探讨优质护理模式对小儿支气管肺炎疗效及肺功能的影响.齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2014,35(13):1982~1983.
5 张海燕,欧琳华,徐志威,等.异丙托溴胺,舒喘灵和普米克令舒联合吸入治疗重度喘憋性肺炎的疗效分析.国际医药卫生导报,2013,19(14):2125~2127.
6 李雪清,罗保民.小儿喘憋性肺炎氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗的临床观察及护理.中国医药指南,2013,11(16):764~765.
7 孙莉.全程系统护理应用于氧气驱动雾化吸入辅助治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎的效果观察.继续医学教育,2014,28(2):51~52.
8 向金平.氧气驱动雾化吸入辅助治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎的全程系统护理.中外医学研究,2014,12(35):137~138.
9 李美荣.氧气驱动雾化吸入辅助治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎的护理探讨.中国医药指南,2015,13(12):234~235.
10 陈寿英.综合护理在氧气驱动雾化吸入辅助治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎中的应用效果.临床合理用药杂志,2015,8(27):153~154.
2 邓聪,邓朝晖,曾海生,等.小剂量甲强龙联合喘可治雾化吸入治疗喘憋性肺炎的疗效分析.齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2015,36(5):644~645.
3 田桂英.氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎的疗效观察及护理.护理实践与研究,2014,11(2):74~75.
4 侯红莉.探讨优质护理模式对小儿支气管肺炎疗效及肺功能的影响.齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2014,35(13):1982~1983.
5 张海燕,欧琳华,徐志威,等.异丙托溴胺,舒喘灵和普米克令舒联合吸入治疗重度喘憋性肺炎的疗效分析.国际医药卫生导报,2013,19(14):2125~2127.
6 李雪清,罗保民.小儿喘憋性肺炎氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗的临床观察及护理.中国医药指南,2013,11(16):764~765.
7 孙莉.全程系统护理应用于氧气驱动雾化吸入辅助治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎的效果观察.继续医学教育,2014,28(2):51~52.
8 向金平.氧气驱动雾化吸入辅助治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎的全程系统护理.中外医学研究,2014,12(35):137~138.
9 李美荣.氧气驱动雾化吸入辅助治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎的护理探讨.中国医药指南,2015,13(12):234~235.
10 陈寿英.综合护理在氧气驱动雾化吸入辅助治疗小儿喘憋性肺炎中的应用效果.临床合理用药杂志,2015,8(27):153~154.