低山丘陵区高标准基本农田建设限制性因子识别与建设方向
|
摘要
[目的]识别低山丘陵区高标准基本农田建设的限制性因素。[方法]基于GIS平台,运用AHP-熵权法,以重庆市高标准基本农田建设的6个典型项目区为例,从田块禀赋、设施配套、投入产出水平、社会经济水平及生态环境等5方面选取15项指标,识别低山丘陵区高标准基本农田建设的限制性因素。[结果](1)低山丘陵区高标准基本农田建设限制性因素依次存在中低山缓坡区>丘陵宽谷区>河谷平坝区的趋势,且不同微地貌条件下的限制性因素存在一定差异。(2)从项目区评价分值来看,河谷平坝区耕地质量分值最高,为高标准基本农田重点建设区域;丘陵宽谷区建设条件与耕地质量较好,是高标准基本农田建设次重点区域;而中低山缓坡区限制性因子较多,高标准基本农田建设适宜性较差。(3)文章研究的AHP-熵权法可以适用于其他地貌类型单元下高标准基本农田建设限制性因素识别研究。[结论]因地制宜,科学合理安排低山丘陵区微地貌类型下的高标准基本农田建设内容与整治任务。
The research aims to explore the limited factors of well-facilitated farmland construction in hilly areas.Taking 6 typical project areas of high-standard basic farmland construction in Chongqing as an example,this research used the AHP-entropy weight method to identify the restrictive factors of high-standard basic farmland construction in hilly areas by selecting 15 elements from five aspects including farmland endowment,supporting facilities,input-output level,socio-economic level and ecological environment based on the GIS platform. The results show that( 1) A common tendency of restrictive factors in well-facilitated farmland construction is showed that low mountain gentle slope area > hilly valley > the valley plain in special areas. Moreover,there are certain differences in restrictive factors under different micro-geomorphological conditions.( 2) From the perspective of evaluation score,the score of farmland in valley pain is the highest,which is the priority area to construct the wellfacilitated farmland; the score of farmland in hilly valley is secondary,which is the secondary area to construct; the score of farmland in low mountain gentle slope area is lowest,which is suitable for constructing well-facilitated farmland.( 3) The method( AHP-entropy weight method) of this research can be applied to identify limited factors of well-facilitated farmland construction in the condition of other topographic feature. According to the local condition,the government should scientifically and rationally arrange the content and renovation tasks of wellfacilitated farmland under the micro-geomorphology types of low hilly areas.
The research aims to explore the limited factors of well-facilitated farmland construction in hilly areas.Taking 6 typical project areas of high-standard basic farmland construction in Chongqing as an example,this research used the AHP-entropy weight method to identify the restrictive factors of high-standard basic farmland construction in hilly areas by selecting 15 elements from five aspects including farmland endowment,supporting facilities,input-output level,socio-economic level and ecological environment based on the GIS platform. The results show that( 1) A common tendency of restrictive factors in well-facilitated farmland construction is showed that low mountain gentle slope area > hilly valley > the valley plain in special areas. Moreover,there are certain differences in restrictive factors under different micro-geomorphological conditions.( 2) From the perspective of evaluation score,the score of farmland in valley pain is the highest,which is the priority area to construct the wellfacilitated farmland; the score of farmland in hilly valley is secondary,which is the secondary area to construct; the score of farmland in low mountain gentle slope area is lowest,which is suitable for constructing well-facilitated farmland.( 3) The method( AHP-entropy weight method) of this research can be applied to identify limited factors of well-facilitated farmland construction in the condition of other topographic feature. According to the local condition,the government should scientifically and rationally arrange the content and renovation tasks of wellfacilitated farmland under the micro-geomorphology types of low hilly areas.
引文
[1]Qian ZHUANG.Evaluation of Integrated Production Capacity of Well-facilitated Farmland in Jiangsu Province.Asian Agricultural Research,2016,8(12):60-65.
[2]ShanGuo,Geoffrey Qiping Shen,Zhan-Ming Chen,Rong Yu.Embodied cultivated land use in China 1987-2007.Ecological Indicators,2014,47.
[3]Hai-peng NIU,Guo-you FANG,Han-qi GAO,Jian-rui SONG.Cultivated land quantity niche regulation and its environmental effect.Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China,2011,21.
[4]孙宇,高明,莫建兵,等.西南丘陵区高标准基本农田建设区域划定研究——以重庆市铜梁区为例.中国土地科学,2016,30(3):20~28,87,97.
[5]胡业翠,吕小龙,赵国梁.四川省达县高标准基本农田建设规模与建设区域划定.中国土地科学,2014,28(11):30-38.
[6]王新盼,姜广辉,张瑞娟,等.高标准基本农田建设区域划定方法.农业工程学报,2013,29(10):241-250.
[7]王晨,汪景宽,李红丹,等.高标准基本农田区域分布与建设潜力研究.中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(S2):226-229.
[8]方勤先,严飞,魏朝富,等.丘陵区高标准基本农田建设条件及潜力分析——以重庆市荣昌县为例.西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2014,39(3):122-130.
[9]刘慧敏,朱江洪.丘陵山区高标准基本农田建设时序与模式研究.水土保持研究,2015,22(2):142-148.
[10]唐秀美,潘瑜春,刘玉,等.基于四象限法的县域高标准基本农田建设布局与模式.农业工程学报,2014,30(13):238-246,293.
[11]薛剑,韩娟,张凤荣,等.高标准基本农田建设评价模型的构建及建设时序的确定.农业工程学报,2014,30(5):193-203.
[12]蔡朕,刁承泰,王锐,等.基于集对分析的高标准基本农田建设项目选址合理性评价——以重庆市梁平县为例.中国生态农业学报,2014,22(7):828-836.
[13]刘霈珈,吴克宁,赵华甫.河南省温县吨粮田高标准基本农田选址研究.中国农业资源与区划,2015,36(3):10-17.
[14]李远远,刘光前.基于AHP-熵权法的煤矿生产物流安全评价.安全与环境学报,2015,15(3):29-33.
[15]信桂新,杨朝现,杨庆媛,等.用熵权法和改进TOPSIS模型评价高标准基本农田建设后效应.农业工程学报,2017,33(1):238-249.
[16]唐秀美,潘瑜春,程晋南,等.高标准基本农田建设对耕地生态系统服务价值的影响.生态学报,2015,35(24):8009-8015.
[2]ShanGuo,Geoffrey Qiping Shen,Zhan-Ming Chen,Rong Yu.Embodied cultivated land use in China 1987-2007.Ecological Indicators,2014,47.
[3]Hai-peng NIU,Guo-you FANG,Han-qi GAO,Jian-rui SONG.Cultivated land quantity niche regulation and its environmental effect.Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China,2011,21.
[4]孙宇,高明,莫建兵,等.西南丘陵区高标准基本农田建设区域划定研究——以重庆市铜梁区为例.中国土地科学,2016,30(3):20~28,87,97.
[5]胡业翠,吕小龙,赵国梁.四川省达县高标准基本农田建设规模与建设区域划定.中国土地科学,2014,28(11):30-38.
[6]王新盼,姜广辉,张瑞娟,等.高标准基本农田建设区域划定方法.农业工程学报,2013,29(10):241-250.
[7]王晨,汪景宽,李红丹,等.高标准基本农田区域分布与建设潜力研究.中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(S2):226-229.
[8]方勤先,严飞,魏朝富,等.丘陵区高标准基本农田建设条件及潜力分析——以重庆市荣昌县为例.西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2014,39(3):122-130.
[9]刘慧敏,朱江洪.丘陵山区高标准基本农田建设时序与模式研究.水土保持研究,2015,22(2):142-148.
[10]唐秀美,潘瑜春,刘玉,等.基于四象限法的县域高标准基本农田建设布局与模式.农业工程学报,2014,30(13):238-246,293.
[11]薛剑,韩娟,张凤荣,等.高标准基本农田建设评价模型的构建及建设时序的确定.农业工程学报,2014,30(5):193-203.
[12]蔡朕,刁承泰,王锐,等.基于集对分析的高标准基本农田建设项目选址合理性评价——以重庆市梁平县为例.中国生态农业学报,2014,22(7):828-836.
[13]刘霈珈,吴克宁,赵华甫.河南省温县吨粮田高标准基本农田选址研究.中国农业资源与区划,2015,36(3):10-17.
[14]李远远,刘光前.基于AHP-熵权法的煤矿生产物流安全评价.安全与环境学报,2015,15(3):29-33.
[15]信桂新,杨朝现,杨庆媛,等.用熵权法和改进TOPSIS模型评价高标准基本农田建设后效应.农业工程学报,2017,33(1):238-249.
[16]唐秀美,潘瑜春,程晋南,等.高标准基本农田建设对耕地生态系统服务价值的影响.生态学报,2015,35(24):8009-8015.