南宁市某高校大学生手机成瘾影响因素分析
|
摘要
目的了解大学生手机成瘾状况是否与年级和专业有关。方法 :采取整群抽样法在广西某高校抽得700名大学生作为调查对象,发放问卷后回收得有效问卷671份。问卷采用手机成瘾指数表(MPAI),被调查对象对MPAI共17个条目中的8个条目做出肯定回答即被称为手机依赖者。结果手机成瘾人数为202人,成瘾率为30.10%;不同年级的大学生手机成瘾差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05);大二、大三年级学生的成瘾得分均高于大一年级和大四年级学生,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05);不同专业大学生手机成瘾差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);临床专业大学生手机成瘾得分上均低于口腔、预防和卫生管理专业大学生,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论该高校大学生手机成瘾率较高。大二、大三年级大学生成瘾率高于大一年级和大四年级大学生,大一、大四年级学生的较低手机成因率可能与新生刚入学的特性及大四生临近毕业有关。临床专业大学生手机成瘾率低于口腔、预防和卫生管理专业大学生,可能与临床专业课程繁多、考试频繁有关,该专业学生无太多时间分配在手机上。手机成瘾预防应重点着手大二、大三、口腔、预防和卫生管理专业的学生。
Objective To understand whether the status of mobile phone addiction among college students is related to grades and majors. Methods 700 college students were collected by cluster sampling method and 671 papers of valid questionnaires were collected. The questionnaire was based on the mobile phone addiction index(MPAI), and the subjects answered positively to 8 of the 17 items in MPAI. Results The number of mobile phone addiction was 202 people, and addiction rate was 30.10%. There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of mobile phone addiction among different grades(P < 0.05). The addiction scores of sophomores and juniors were higher than those of freshmen and senior students, and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). The difference of mobile phone addiction rate among college students with different specialties was statistically significant(P < 0.05). The scores of mobile phone addiction of clinical students were lower than those of oral cavity, prevention and health management, sophomore students, the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). Conclusion The rate of cell phone addiction among the college students is high. The addiction rate of junior students was higher than that of freshmen and seniors, this may be related to the characteristics of freshmen and the proximity of students to senior graduation. The rate of cell phone addiction in clinical students is lower than that in oral cavity, prevention and health management, sophomore, which may be related to a wide range of clinical students' courses and frequent exams, and this students do not have much time to allocate to their mobile phones. Mobile phone addiction Prevention should focus on sophomore, junior, and major of oral, preventive and health management.
Objective To understand whether the status of mobile phone addiction among college students is related to grades and majors. Methods 700 college students were collected by cluster sampling method and 671 papers of valid questionnaires were collected. The questionnaire was based on the mobile phone addiction index(MPAI), and the subjects answered positively to 8 of the 17 items in MPAI. Results The number of mobile phone addiction was 202 people, and addiction rate was 30.10%. There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of mobile phone addiction among different grades(P < 0.05). The addiction scores of sophomores and juniors were higher than those of freshmen and senior students, and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). The difference of mobile phone addiction rate among college students with different specialties was statistically significant(P < 0.05). The scores of mobile phone addiction of clinical students were lower than those of oral cavity, prevention and health management, sophomore students, the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). Conclusion The rate of cell phone addiction among the college students is high. The addiction rate of junior students was higher than that of freshmen and seniors, this may be related to the characteristics of freshmen and the proximity of students to senior graduation. The rate of cell phone addiction in clinical students is lower than that in oral cavity, prevention and health management, sophomore, which may be related to a wide range of clinical students' courses and frequent exams, and this students do not have much time to allocate to their mobile phones. Mobile phone addiction Prevention should focus on sophomore, junior, and major of oral, preventive and health management.
引文
[1]朱玉歆.大学生手机成瘾和睡眠质量的关系[J].社会心理科学,2015(10):73-80.
[2]韩登亮,齐志裴.大学生手机成瘾症的心理学探析[J].当代青年研究,2005(12):34-38.
[3]Leung L.Linking Psychological Attributes to Addiction and Improper Use of the Mobile Phone among Adolescents in Hong Kong[J].JChildren and Media,2008,2(2):93-113.
[4]罗舒仁,黎燕宁,周少钦,等.南宁市某高校大学生的手机依赖情况及其影响因素分析[J].广西医学,2017,39(7):1050-1052,1067.
[5]张斌,袁孟琪,黎志华,等.大学生人格特质与手机成瘾的关系:情绪体验的中介作用[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2017,25(6):1098-1100,1092.
[6]崔玉玲,澎美,韩玉莹,等.大学生手机依赖与自尊、孤独感的关系[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2015(8):1193-1195,1196.
[7]刘红,王洪礼.大学生的手机依赖倾向与孤独感[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2012(1):66-69.
[8]朱玲玲,刘志强.高职院校大学生手机成瘾的现状及特征[J].中国卫生统计,2017,34(5):767-769.
[9]黄武南,杨明明.大学新生教育发展方向及对策浅议--基于美国高校的经验分析和新生转型及教育计划模式构建[J].思想教育研究,2016(3):115-118.
[10]廖文娜.大学新生心理冲突的特点和教育对策[J].广东开放大学学报,2016(25):92-96.
[11]付桂芳,李欲瑶,徐柱焜,等.大学生手机依赖现状的调查研究[J].高教学刊,2016(1):65-66,68.
[12]臧慧.大数据背景下医学院校伦理素养培养模式探究[J].广西医学,2018,40(1):118-120.
[13]卞樱芳,周俊,王栋,等.大学生智能手机成瘾与学习厌倦的相关研究[J].国际精神病学杂志,2018,45(1):103-106.
[2]韩登亮,齐志裴.大学生手机成瘾症的心理学探析[J].当代青年研究,2005(12):34-38.
[3]Leung L.Linking Psychological Attributes to Addiction and Improper Use of the Mobile Phone among Adolescents in Hong Kong[J].JChildren and Media,2008,2(2):93-113.
[4]罗舒仁,黎燕宁,周少钦,等.南宁市某高校大学生的手机依赖情况及其影响因素分析[J].广西医学,2017,39(7):1050-1052,1067.
[5]张斌,袁孟琪,黎志华,等.大学生人格特质与手机成瘾的关系:情绪体验的中介作用[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2017,25(6):1098-1100,1092.
[6]崔玉玲,澎美,韩玉莹,等.大学生手机依赖与自尊、孤独感的关系[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2015(8):1193-1195,1196.
[7]刘红,王洪礼.大学生的手机依赖倾向与孤独感[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2012(1):66-69.
[8]朱玲玲,刘志强.高职院校大学生手机成瘾的现状及特征[J].中国卫生统计,2017,34(5):767-769.
[9]黄武南,杨明明.大学新生教育发展方向及对策浅议--基于美国高校的经验分析和新生转型及教育计划模式构建[J].思想教育研究,2016(3):115-118.
[10]廖文娜.大学新生心理冲突的特点和教育对策[J].广东开放大学学报,2016(25):92-96.
[11]付桂芳,李欲瑶,徐柱焜,等.大学生手机依赖现状的调查研究[J].高教学刊,2016(1):65-66,68.
[12]臧慧.大数据背景下医学院校伦理素养培养模式探究[J].广西医学,2018,40(1):118-120.
[13]卞樱芳,周俊,王栋,等.大学生智能手机成瘾与学习厌倦的相关研究[J].国际精神病学杂志,2018,45(1):103-106.