不同减隔震措施下平板支座抗震性能试验研究
|
摘要
为探究不同减隔震措施对短边距混凝土网架平板支座的抗震性能和破坏模式的影响,分别针对不同混凝土边缘距离以及采用不同减隔震措施的四个平板支座缩尺试件进行拟静力加载试验,对平板支座破坏模式、滞回曲线、箍筋应变进行分析。试验结果表明:平板支座的运动伴随着平动和转动。当混凝土边距不足时,边缘混凝土在压剪作用下,会发生冲切破坏。开长孔支座能较好的释放水平位移,并且对锚栓约束较弱,使其受力较小,从而减轻了边缘混凝土的受力。对采用橡胶垫板的支座,混凝土边缘未发生破坏,原因是橡胶垫具有良好的变形能力,可以释放支座的位移和转角,使得边缘混凝土受力较小。因此,针对混凝土边缘距离较短的平板支座节点,为防止混凝土发生边缘破坏,可采用开长孔支座,但需要对孔长进行合理的设计。采用橡胶垫支座也可避免混凝土发生边缘破坏,橡胶垫板可按照我国相关设计规范进行设计。
In order to investigate the effect of different seismic isolation measures on the seismic performance and failure modes of roof joint with short edge concrete, four specimens with different concrete edge distances and different seismic isolation measures were designed. Quasi-static loading tests were carried out to analyse the failure modes, hysteresis curves, and stirrup strains of roof joint. The test results show that the motion of roof joint is accompanied by the translational motion and rotation. If the edge distance of concrete is too small, edge concrete will be punched and destroyed under pressure and shear force. The roof joint with loose hole of base plate can release the horizontal displacement of the roof joint. The stress of anchor rod with loose hole of base plate is smaller, thereby reducing the edge damage of the concrete. The edge concrete was excellent without damage if roof joint using rubber bearing. The reason is that the rubber bearing can release the displacement and rotation of the roof joint, and the stress of edge concrete is small. For the roof joint with small edge distance of concrete, the hole length of base plate can be reasonably designed in order to prevent edge failure of concrete. And rubber bearings can also be used, which can be carried out in accordance with relevant design specifications in China.
In order to investigate the effect of different seismic isolation measures on the seismic performance and failure modes of roof joint with short edge concrete, four specimens with different concrete edge distances and different seismic isolation measures were designed. Quasi-static loading tests were carried out to analyse the failure modes, hysteresis curves, and stirrup strains of roof joint. The test results show that the motion of roof joint is accompanied by the translational motion and rotation. If the edge distance of concrete is too small, edge concrete will be punched and destroyed under pressure and shear force. The roof joint with loose hole of base plate can release the horizontal displacement of the roof joint. The stress of anchor rod with loose hole of base plate is smaller, thereby reducing the edge damage of the concrete. The edge concrete was excellent without damage if roof joint using rubber bearing. The reason is that the rubber bearing can release the displacement and rotation of the roof joint, and the stress of edge concrete is small. For the roof joint with small edge distance of concrete, the hole length of base plate can be reasonably designed in order to prevent edge failure of concrete. And rubber bearings can also be used, which can be carried out in accordance with relevant design specifications in China.
引文
[1] 张毅刚, 薛素铎, 杨庆山, 等. 大跨空间结构[M]. 2版. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2013: 55-101.ZHANG Yigang, XUE Suduo, YANG Qingshan, et al. Large-span space structure [M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2013: 55-101. (in Chinese)
[2] Dai Junwu, Qu Zhe, Zhang Chenxiao, et al. Preliminary investigation of seismic damage to two steel space structures during the 2013 Lushan earthquake [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2013, 12(3): 497-500.
[3] 聂桂波, 戴君武, 张辰啸. 芦山地震中大跨空间结构主要破坏模式及数值分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015, 48(4): 1-6.NIE Guibo, DAI Junwu, ZHANG Chenxiao. Failure patterns of large span space structures in Lushan earthquake and numerical simulation [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48(4): 1-6. (in Chinese)
[4] Architecture Institute of Japan (AIJ). Report on the Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster (Building Series Volume 3) [R]. Japan. AIJ, 2014: 286-299. (in Japanese)
[5] Yamada Satoshi, Shimada Yuko, Tomatsu Kazuki, et al. Cyclic loading tests of connection between RC frame and steel roof: Study of connection between RC frame and steel roof (Part 1) [J]. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), 2014, 79(705): 1687-1697. (in Japanese)
[6] Tomatsu Kazuki, Yamada Satoshi, Shimada Yuko, et al. Loading tests of connections between RC frame and steel roof: Results and methods of the tests for the series of G and H (Part 11) [C]// Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting Kanto Branch AIJ, 86(I), 277-280, 2016. (in Japanese)
[7] 杜修力, 韩强, 刘文光, 等. 方形多铅芯橡胶支座力学性能研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2006, 26(2):125-130.DU Xiuli, HAN Qiang, LIU Whenguang, et al. Mechanical behavior of square multi-lead rubber bearing [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2006, 26(2):125-130 (in Chinese)
[8] 李涵, 袁万城, 田圣泽,等. 钢丝网复合橡胶减隔震支座拟静力试验与恢复力模型研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2015, 01(6):144-149.LI Han, YUAN Wancheng, TIAN Shengze, et al. Quasi-static test and research on the restoring force model of the steel mesh reinforced elastomeric isolation bearing [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2015, 01(6):144-149 (in Chinese)
[9] GB50010-2010 混凝土结构设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.GB50010-2010 Code for Design of Concrete Structures[S]. Beijing: China Architecture Industry Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
[10] JGJ7-2010 空间网格结构技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.JGJ7-2010 Technical Specification for Space Frame Structures [S]. Beijing: China Architecture Industry Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
[2] Dai Junwu, Qu Zhe, Zhang Chenxiao, et al. Preliminary investigation of seismic damage to two steel space structures during the 2013 Lushan earthquake [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2013, 12(3): 497-500.
[3] 聂桂波, 戴君武, 张辰啸. 芦山地震中大跨空间结构主要破坏模式及数值分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015, 48(4): 1-6.NIE Guibo, DAI Junwu, ZHANG Chenxiao. Failure patterns of large span space structures in Lushan earthquake and numerical simulation [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48(4): 1-6. (in Chinese)
[4] Architecture Institute of Japan (AIJ). Report on the Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster (Building Series Volume 3) [R]. Japan. AIJ, 2014: 286-299. (in Japanese)
[5] Yamada Satoshi, Shimada Yuko, Tomatsu Kazuki, et al. Cyclic loading tests of connection between RC frame and steel roof: Study of connection between RC frame and steel roof (Part 1) [J]. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), 2014, 79(705): 1687-1697. (in Japanese)
[6] Tomatsu Kazuki, Yamada Satoshi, Shimada Yuko, et al. Loading tests of connections between RC frame and steel roof: Results and methods of the tests for the series of G and H (Part 11) [C]// Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting Kanto Branch AIJ, 86(I), 277-280, 2016. (in Japanese)
[7] 杜修力, 韩强, 刘文光, 等. 方形多铅芯橡胶支座力学性能研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2006, 26(2):125-130.DU Xiuli, HAN Qiang, LIU Whenguang, et al. Mechanical behavior of square multi-lead rubber bearing [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2006, 26(2):125-130 (in Chinese)
[8] 李涵, 袁万城, 田圣泽,等. 钢丝网复合橡胶减隔震支座拟静力试验与恢复力模型研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2015, 01(6):144-149.LI Han, YUAN Wancheng, TIAN Shengze, et al. Quasi-static test and research on the restoring force model of the steel mesh reinforced elastomeric isolation bearing [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2015, 01(6):144-149 (in Chinese)
[9] GB50010-2010 混凝土结构设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.GB50010-2010 Code for Design of Concrete Structures[S]. Beijing: China Architecture Industry Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
[10] JGJ7-2010 空间网格结构技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.JGJ7-2010 Technical Specification for Space Frame Structures [S]. Beijing: China Architecture Industry Press, 2010. (in Chinese)