2017年岳城水库水环境质量综合评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comprehensive Evaluation of Water Environment Quality of Yuecheng Reservoir in 2017
  • 作者:闫寿松 ; 王国涛 ; 李海峰
  • 英文作者:YAN Shousong;WANG Guotao;LI Haifeng;Anyang Hydrology and Water Resources Survey Bureau of Henan Province;
  • 关键词:岳城水库 ; 物理生境指标 ; 水质理化指标 ; 水生生物指标
  • 英文关键词:Yuecheng Reservoir;;physical habitat index;;water physical chemical index;;aquatic organism index
  • 中文刊名:KXSD
  • 英文刊名:Wetland Science
  • 机构:河南省安阳水文水资源勘测局;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-15
  • 出版单位:湿地科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.17
  • 基金:2017年度河南省河流水库水质监测项目资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:KXSD201902008
  • 页数:6
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:22-1349/P
  • 分类号:59-64
摘要
为了对岳城水库水环境质量进行综合评价,在岳城水库设置6个监测点,于2017年4月15日和9月12日,采集水样,分别对其物理生境指标、水质理化指标和水生生物指标进行测定,通过指标选取、指标赋分和加权求和,计算得到岳城水库水生态环境质量综合指数。研究结果表明,岳城水库水生态环境质量综合指数为2.65,水库整体处于轻度污染状态,主要是因为水库上游河流长期注入污染物以及库区底泥含较多的有机质和腐殖质。
        In order to give a comprehensive evaluation of water environmental quality of Yuecheng Reservoir,6 monitoring sites were set, and the water samples were selected on April 15 and September 12 of 2017. Physical habitat indexes, water physical chemical indexes and aquatic organism indexes were chosen for field investigation. Through index selection, index assignment and weighted summation, the water environmental quality index was calculated to represent the aquatic environmental quality. The result showed that the water environmental quality index was 2.65. Yuecheng Reservoir was in slightly polluted station, and reasons which caused pollution were the pollutant into the reservoir from upstream rivers, and contents of organic matter and humus were high in the sediment of the reservoir.
引文
[1]许秀梅,陈佳喜,柴方营,等.多布库尔自然保护区水体浮游植物分布及水质综合评价[J].湿地科学, 2017, 1155(3):457-463.
    [2]Hsu A, Sherbinin A, Shi H. Seeking truth from facts:The challenge of environmental indicator development in China[J]. Environmental Development, 2012, 33:39-51.
    [3]李佳民,吕连宽,于鹏,等. 2010~2014年穆棱河水质分析[J].湿地科学, 2016, 1144(2):226-229.
    [4]高园园,谭林山,张淼.岳城水库饮用水源地保护对策分析[J].海河水利, 2016, 55:39-40.
    [5]于伟东.岳城水库水体富营养化趋势分析及保护对策[J].海河水利, 2010, 1122:16-18.
    [6]徐静,韩朝光.岳城水库饮用水源地水体富营养化预防措施探讨[J].海河水利, 2011, 88:14-18.
    [7]姜新佩,张春霞,赵强龙.岳城水库水质富营养化评价[J].华北水利水电学院学报, 2013, 3366(4):50-53.
    [8]中华人民共和国水利部水资源司.《湖泊健康评估指标、标准与方法(试点)》[R].北京:中华人民共和国水利部水资源司, 2011.
    [9]胡鸿钧,魏印心.中国淡水藻类——系统、分类及生态[M].北京:科学出版社, 2006.
    [10]刘月英.中国经济动物志:淡水软体动物[M].北京:科学出版社, 1979.
    [11]Morse J C, Yang L F, Tian L X. Aquatic insects of China useful for monitoring water quality[M]. Nanjing:Hohai University Press, 1994.
    [12]Wilhm J L, Dorris T C. Biological parameters for water quality criteria[J]. Bioscience, 1968, 1188:477-481.
    [13]Hilsenhoff W L. Using a biotic index to evaluate water quality in streams[C]//Hilsenhoff W L, Hine R L. Technical Bulleting No.132,Madison, Wisconsin:Department of Natural Resources, 1982.
    [14]阴琨,王业耀.水生态环境质量评价体系研究[J].中国环境监测, 2018, 3344(1):1-8.
    [15]王备新,杨莲芳.我国东部底栖无脊椎动物主要分类单元耐污值[J].生态学报, 2004, 244(12):2768-2775.
    [16]赵瑞,高欣,丁森,等.辽河流域大型底栖动物耐污值[J].生态学报, 2015, 3355(14):4797-4809.
    [17]王建国,黄恢柏,杨明旭,等.庐山地区底栖大型无脊椎动物耐污值与水质生物学评价[J].应用与环境生物学报, 2003, 99(3):279-284.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700