血流储备分数指导女性冠状动脉临界病变的治疗及预后研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Fractional flow reserve-guided treatment of coronary artery borderline lesions and its outcome in female patients
  • 作者:霍志成 ; 王永德 ; 王晓梅 ; 陈卫强 ; 张健
  • 英文作者:Huo Zhicheng;Wang Yongde;Wang Xiaomei;Chen Weiqiang;Zhang Jian;No.3 Department of Internal Medicine,TEDA International Hospital of Cardiovascular Diseases;
  • 关键词:血流储备分数 ; 心肌 ; 高血压 ; 高脂血症 ; 年龄因素
  • 英文关键词:fractional flow reserve,myocardial;;hypertension;;hyperlipidemias;;age factors
  • 中文刊名:LNXG
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart Brain and Vessel Diseases
  • 机构:泰达国际心血管病医院内三科;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-15
  • 出版单位:中华老年心脑血管病杂志
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.21
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:LNXG201906012
  • 页数:4
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:11-4468/R
  • 分类号:42-45
摘要
目的研究血流储备分数(FFR)指导女性冠状动脉临界病变的治疗及预后。方法纳入我院行冠状动脉造影为临界病变的患者270例,其中男性160例,女性110例,根据FFR值决定治疗方案,比较男性与女性临床资料特征、FFR值、PCI比例及随访期间主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率。结果女性患者年龄、合并高血压及高脂血症比例高于男性,既往心肌梗死、吸烟和饮酒史比例低于男性,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05,P<0.01)。女性FFR值明显高于男性,差异有统计学意义(0.85±0.08 vs 0.83±0.08,P=0.036)。男性与女性行PCI比例比较,差异无统计学意义(29.4%vs 24.5%,P=0.382)。完成临床随访患者262例中,男性156例,发生MACE 7例;女性106例,发生MACE 8例,男性与女性MACE发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(4.5%vs 7.5%,P=0.295)。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,男性与女性生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(95.5%vs 92.5%,P=0.366)。结论临界病变的FFR值有性别差异,女性的FFR值较男性高;FFR指导临界病变治疗的预后无性别差异。
        Objective To study the fractional flow reserve(FFR)-guided treatment of coronary artery borderline lesions and its outcome in female patients.Methods Two hundred and seventy patients(160 males and 110 females)with coronary borderline lesions who underwent coronary angiography in our hospital were included in this study.The patients were treated according to their FFR.The clinical data,FFR value,PCI rate and incidence of MACE during the follow-up period were compared between male and female patients.Results The age was significantly older,the incidence of hypertension and hyperlipidemia was signjificantly higher while the history of myocardial infarction,smoking and alcohol consumption was significantly lower in female patients than in male patients(P<0.05,P<0.01).The FFR value was significantly higher in female patients than in male patients(0.85±0.08 vs 0.83±0.08,P=0.036).No significant difference was detected in PCI rate bwtween male and female patients(29.4%vs 24.5%,P=0.382).Two hundred and sixty-two patients were followed up,during which MACE occurred in 7 out of the 156 male patients and in 8 out of the 106 female patients.No significant difference was detected in the incidence of MCAE between male and female patients(4.5% vs 7.5%,P=0.295).Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed no significant difference in the survival rate between male and female patients(95.5%vs 92.5%,P=0.366).Conclusion The FFR value is higher in female patients than in male patients.No gender difference is found in the outcome of FFR-guided treatment of coronary borderline lesions.
引文
[1]Zimmermann FM,Ferrara A,Johnson NP,et al.Deferral vs.performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis:15-year follow-up of the DEFER Trial[J].Eur Heart J,2015,36(45):3182-3188.DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv452.
    [2]Prasad S,Harikrishnan S,Sanjay G,et al.Clinical outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease who underwent FFRevaluation of intermediate coronary lesionS-COFFRS study[J].Indian Heart J,2017,69(4):499-504.DOI:10.1016/j.ihj.2016.12.007.
    [3]Kim CH,Koo BK,Lee JM,et al.Influence of sex on relationship between total anatomical and physiologic disease burdens and their prognostic implications in patients with coronary artery disease[J].J Am Heart Assoc,2019,8(5):e011002.DOI:10.1161/JAHA.118.011002
    [4]Ihdayhid AR,Yong A,Harper R,et al.A practical guide for fractional flow reserve guided revascularisation[J].Heart Lung Cir,2018,27(4):406-419.DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2017.09.017.
    [5]Van Belle E,Rioufol G,Pouillot C,et al.Outcome impact of coronary revascularization strategy reclassification with fractional flow reserve at time of diagnostic angiography:insights from a large French multicenter fractional flow reserve registry[J].Circulation,2014,129(2):173-185.DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006646.
    [6]Park SH,Jeon KH,Lee JM,et al.Long-term clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided versus routine drugeluting stent implantation in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis:five-year clinical outcomes of DEFER-DES Trial[J].Circ Cardiovasc Interv,2015,8(12):e002442.DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002442.
    [7]Lakhter V,Alkhouli M,Zack CJ,et al.Sex differences in fractional flow reserve-guided fevascularization:a nationwide analysis[J].J Womens Health(Larchmt),2017,26(2):109-115.DOI:10.1089/jwh.2016.5806.
    [8]Fineschi M,Guerrieri G,Orphal D,et al.The impact of gender on fractional flow reserve measurements[J].EuroIntervention,2013,9(3):360-366.DOI:10.4244/EIJV9I3A58.
    [9]余铭,黄翔,丁娟,等.冠状动脉临界病变中冠状动脉血流储备分数相关因素分析[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2015,29(12):1179-1181.DOI:10.13507/j.issn.1674-3474.2015.12.012.
    [10]Coutinho T,Mielniczuk LM,Srivaratharajah K,et al.Coronary artery microvascular dysfunction:role of sex and arterial load[J].Int J Cardiol,2018,270:42-47.DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.072.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700