摘要
目的:比较共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(即皮肤CT)和挤压涂片法对毛囊蠕形螨的检出率。方法:选取2018年3月我科门诊无面部皮疹的患者共80人作为志愿者,分别用皮肤CT及挤压涂片法镜检行毛囊蠕形螨检查。结果:皮肤CT检查有41例呈阳性,挤压涂片法有27例呈阳性,检出率比较有统计学意义(X2=5. 01,P <0. 05)。结论:皮肤CT对毛囊蠕形螨的检出率高于挤压涂片法,适合门诊检查与诊断。
Objective: To make a comparison of positive detection ratesof demodex folliculorum between skin CT and squeezing method. Methods: A total of 80 patients with no facial rash come from our outpatients in March 2018 were selected as volunteers,then skin CT and squeeze method were used to examine the demodex folliculorum. Results: Demodex folliculorum were detectedin 41 volunteerscarried on a skin CTinspection and 27 positive cases were found by squeezing method. Difference betweenthetwogroupshasstatisticalsignificance( X2= 5. 01,P < 0. 05). Conclusion: Skin CT has a higher positive detection rateof demodex folliculorum than squeezing method. It is suitable for outpatient examination and diagnosis.
引文
1李婷,陈向明,张海清,等.标准化皮肤表层取材法用于酒渣鼻患者皮肤毛囊蠕形螨镜检[J].中华皮肤科杂志,2015,48(7):503-504.
2 Sattler EC,Maier T,Hoffmann VS,et al.Noninvasive in vivo detection and quantification of demodex mites by confocal laser scanning microscopy[J].Br J Dermatol,2012,167:1042-1047.
3刘华绪,林燕,于世荣,等.反射式共聚焦显微镜皮肤病图谱[M],人民卫生出版社,2013,30-31.
4陈蕾,高峰,于维恒,等.反射式共聚焦激光扫描显微镜检测毛囊蠕形螨感染的临床应用[J].中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2017,33(11):653-656.
5沈继龙,张进顺.临床寄生虫学检验(第4版)[M],人民卫生出版社,2012,174-175.
6 Forton F,Germaux MA,Brasseur T,et a1.Demodicosis and rosacea:epidemiology and significance in daily dermatologicpractice[J].JAm Acad Dermatol,2005,52(1):74-87.
7ü.A爧kin,D.Se9kin.Comparison of the two techniques for measurement of the density of Demodex folliculorum:standardized skin surface biopsy and directmicroscopic examination[J].Br J Dermatol,2010,162(5):1124-1126.
8 Zhao YE,Peng Y,Wang XL,et a1.Facial dermatosisassociatedwith Demodex:a case-controlstudy[J].J Zhejiang Univ Sci B,2011,12(12):1008-1015.
9肖佳,郭爱元,黄健,等.共聚焦激光扫描显微镜在蠕形螨检测中的应用[J].中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志,2016,04(34),366-369.