摘要
科学数据诚信问题是学术论文被撤销的重要原因,伪造数据、剽窃是主要的学术不端行为。美国ORI公布的与数据有关的学术不端案例共26起,COPE网站收录的涉及数据诚信问题的案例共125件,Retraction Watch收录的与数据诚信有关的撤销论文共2 638篇。在数据密集型科研范式下,通过促进科研过程中的数据开放性和透明度,并对数据科学评价以提高科学严谨性等措施有利于科研诚信建设。
引文
[1]Tyfield D.Transition to Science 2.0:“Remoralizi ng”the Economy of Science[J].Spontaneous Gene rations A Journal for the History&Philosophy,2013,7(1).
[2]徐丽芳,王钰.开放科学的挑战与因应:2017年海外科技期刊出版动态研究[J].科技与出版,2018(2):13-21.
[3]司莉,贾欢.科学数据的标准规范体系框架研究[J].图书馆,2016(5):5-9.
[4]Bardi A,Manghi P.Enhanced Publications:Data Models and Information Systems[J].Liber Quarterly the Journal of European Research Libraries,2014,22(4).
[5]Woutersen-Windhouwer S,Brandsma R,Hogenaar A,et al.Enhanced Publications:Linking Publications and Research Data in Digital Repositories[J].Amsterdam University Press,2009.
[6]STM position on Open Science[EB/OL].(2016-10-30).[2018-04-28].https://www.stm-assoc.org/2016_10_31_STM_Open_Science_Position.pdf.
[7]张志刚,毛一雷,袁芳.国外学术论文开放存取平台建设分析[J].情报工程,2017,3(06):116-126.
[8]张迎,张志平,梁冰.科学数据管理应用模式的研究[J].情报工程,2017,3(04):71-77.
[9]陈晓峰,云昭洁.区块链在学术出版领域的创新应用及展望[J].情报工程,2017,3(02):4-12.
[10]梁洁.ScienceOpen的“互联网+学术出版”模式介绍、分析及启示[J].中国科技期刊研究,2016,27(02):185-192.
[11]Sheet F.Errata,Retraction,Duplicate Publication,Comment,Update and Patient Summary Policy for MEDLINE[homepage on the Internet].Bethesda(MD):National Library of Medicine(US);[EB/OL].2002[updated 2005 Jan 21].
[12]US Department of Health and Human Services,Office of Research Integrity.ORI Policy on Plagiarism[EB/OL].[2018-09-28].https://ori.hhs.gov/ori-policyplagiarism.
[13]Wager E,Williams P.Why and how do journals retract articles?An analysis of Medline retractions1988-2008[J].Journal of medical ethics,2011,37(9):567-570.
[14]Benos D J,et al.Ethics and scientific publication[J].Advances in Physiology Education,2005.29:59-74.
[15]Fang FC,Steen RG,Casadevall A.Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.2013.110(3):1137-1137.
[16]Zhang M,Grieneisen M L.The impact of misconduct on the published medical and non-medical literature,and the news media[J].Scientometrics,2013,96(2):573-587.
[17]US Department of Health and Human Services,Office of Research Integrity.Historical Background[EB/OL].[2017-11-18].https://ori.hhs.gov/historicalbackground.
[18]胡金富,史玉民.美国研究诚信办公室:历史演变、管理体制和运行机制[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(12):47-51.
[19]Committee on Publication Ethics.COPE code of conduct.http://publicationethics.org/code-conduct(accessed 22 Sep 2010).
[20]Oransky,I.,and A.Marcus.Retraction Watch.http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com[EB/OL].
[21]David Mellor.The Landscape of Open Data Policies[EB/OL].[2018-10-13]https://cos.io/blog/landscapeopen-data-policies/.
[22]Timothy M Errington,Elizabeth Iorns,William Gunn,et al.An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research[J].2014,3.
[23]the Center for Open Science.Letter from the Executive Director[EB/OL].[2018-10-13]https://cos.io/about/briefhistory-cos-2013-2017/.
[24]the Center for Open Science.Guidelines for Transparency and Openness Promotion(TOP)in Journal Policies and Practices“The TOP Guidelines”[EB/OL].[2018-10-13].https://osf.io/9f6gx/wiki/Guidelines/.
[25]刘凤红,张恬.开放科学背景下新兴学术论文出版类型:研究要素出版[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(2):138-144.
[26]Marcus R.Munafò,Nosek B A,Bishop D V M,et al.A manifesto for reproducible science[J].2017.
[27]Web of Science所有数据库.帮助[EB/OL].[2018-11-15]http://images.webofknowledge.com//WOKRS530AR16/help/zh_CN/WOK/hs_document_types.html.
[28]姚长青,田瑞强.新科学研究范式下的学术期刊出版趋势研究[J].科技与出版,2018(5):31-36.
[29]scienceopen[EB/OL].[2018-04-28].http://about.scienceopen.com/.
[30]Kriegeskorte N,Walther A,Deca D.An emerging consensus for open evaluation:18 visions for the future of scientific publishing[J].Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience,2012,6(2):94.