正当防卫结束时间之认定——基于接续行为危险说

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

	英文篇名：The Confirmation of the End Time of Legitimate Defense 作者：王林梅 英文作者：WANG Lin-mei; 关键词：正当防卫 ; 不法侵害 ; 结束时间 ; 危险 英文关键词：legitimate defense;;unlawful infringement;;end time;;danger 中文刊名：HNGD 英文刊名：Journal of Hunan Radio and Television University 机构：四川师范大学法学院; 出版日期：2019-06-24 出版单位：湖南广播电视大学学报 年：2019 期：No.78 语种：中文; 页：HNGD201902013 页数：11 CN：02 ISSN：43-1320/C 分类号：76-86

摘要

对于如何认定正当防卫结束时间这一问题,法学界存在诸多不同的观点,但这些观点或学说都较为抽象和模糊,不能很好地指导实践。接续行为危险说通过判断不法侵害人接下来的客观行为是否具有法益侵害的危险来认定不法侵害是否结束,即只要行为人接下来的行为属于扩大以前的危险、新增不同种类的危险、维持巩固以前的危险或危害结果三种行为之一,则表明不法侵害尚未结束。该学说具有直观性、易操作性等优势,能更好地指导实践。
        There are many views and theories on how to determine the end time of legitimate defense,but these theories and views are abstract and vague,which can not guide practice well. The danger theory of successive act determines whether the illegal infringement ends by judging whether the subsequent objective act of the illegal infringer has the danger of infringement of legal interests. That is to say,unlawful infringement has not ended as long as the actor's subsequent action belongs to one of the three acts,which enlarges the previous danger,adds different kinds of danger or maintains the previous danger or harmful result. This theory has the advantages of intuition and easy operation,and can better guide practice.

引文

[1]约书亚·德雷斯勒.美国刑法纲要[M].姜敏,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2016:185.
    [2]山口厚.刑法总则[M].付立庆,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001:99.
    [3]罗克辛.德国刑法学总论[M].王世洲,译.北京:法律出版社,2005:432.
    [4]林钰雄.新刑法总则[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009:187.
    [5]庄绪龙.法益可恢复性犯罪概念之提倡[J].中外法学,2017(04):973.
    [6]洪福增.刑法理论之基础[M].台北:台湾三民书局,1977:394.
    [7]刘志伟.危害公共安全犯罪疑难问题司法对策[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2001:69-69.