护理干预对狼疮性肾炎维持治疗期患者的影响
|
摘要
目的分析护理干预对狼疮性肾炎维持治疗期患者的影响。方法 68例狼疮性肾炎维持治疗期患者,采用随机数字表法分为观察组与对照组,各34例。对照组患者采取常规护理,观察组患者采取全面护理干预。两组患者均随访1年,比较两组患者复发率及并发症发生情况。结果观察组患者复发率为2.94%,明显低于对照组的20.59%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者维持治疗期内感染、心血管并发症以及肾病综合征发生率均明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针对狼疮性肾炎维持治疗期患者采取全面护理干预有助于降低患者并发症风险,有助于控制患者复发率,值得临床应用推广。
Objective To analyze the effect of nursing intervention on patients with lupus nephritis during maintenance treatment. Methods A total of 68 patients with lupus nephritis during maintenance treatment were divided by random number table method into observation group and control group, with 34 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing, and the observation group received comprehensive nursing intervention. After 1 year of follow-up, the recurrence rate and occurrence of complications between the two groups was compared. Results The observation group had obviously lower recurrence rate as 2.94% than 20.59% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The observation group had obviously lower incidence of complications during maintenance treatment than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Comprehensive nursing intervention can help to reduce the risk of complications and control the recurrence rate of patients with lupus nephritis during maintenance treatment. It is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
Objective To analyze the effect of nursing intervention on patients with lupus nephritis during maintenance treatment. Methods A total of 68 patients with lupus nephritis during maintenance treatment were divided by random number table method into observation group and control group, with 34 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing, and the observation group received comprehensive nursing intervention. After 1 year of follow-up, the recurrence rate and occurrence of complications between the two groups was compared. Results The observation group had obviously lower recurrence rate as 2.94% than 20.59% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The observation group had obviously lower incidence of complications during maintenance treatment than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Comprehensive nursing intervention can help to reduce the risk of complications and control the recurrence rate of patients with lupus nephritis during maintenance treatment. It is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
引文
[1]李巧玲.重症狼疮性肾炎的临床护理.现代医药卫生, 2017,33(4):590-591.
[2]曲晓慧.基于重症狼疮性肾炎的临床护理方法分析.世界最新医学信息文摘, 2016, 16(22):239, 242.
[3]邓虔玉,王梦雅,吴雪芳.综合护理在系统性红斑狼疮性肾炎中的应用效果.临床合理用药杂志, 2016, 9(6):160-161.
[4]罗贞,史添立,徐柏平.狼疮性肾炎患者感染的临床分析.中华医院感染学杂志, 2015, 25(18):4216-4218.
[5]陈文,周姣丽,王新珠.护理干预对狼疮性肾炎维持治疗期病人的影响.全科护理, 2010, 8(6):480-482.
[6]康清华.护理干预对狼疮性肾炎维持治疗期的疗效分析.医学信息旬刊, 2010, 23(12):238.
[7]徐会平.分析狼疮性肾炎维持治疗期患者应用护理干预的效果.临床医药文献电子杂志, 2015, 2(2):365-366.
[8]唐跃琼,朱其香,潘宁.系统性红斑狼疮患者的护理干预.中国实用护理杂志, 2012, 28(s2):40-41.
[9]黄惠珊,余美嫦,林宝娟.护理干预对狼疮性肾炎维持治疗期患者的影响.中国药物经济学, 2014(3):144-145.
[10]王秀凤.护理干预对狼疮性肾炎维持治疗期病人的病情影响.中国保健营养旬刊, 2013, 23(5):2518-2519.
[2]曲晓慧.基于重症狼疮性肾炎的临床护理方法分析.世界最新医学信息文摘, 2016, 16(22):239, 242.
[3]邓虔玉,王梦雅,吴雪芳.综合护理在系统性红斑狼疮性肾炎中的应用效果.临床合理用药杂志, 2016, 9(6):160-161.
[4]罗贞,史添立,徐柏平.狼疮性肾炎患者感染的临床分析.中华医院感染学杂志, 2015, 25(18):4216-4218.
[5]陈文,周姣丽,王新珠.护理干预对狼疮性肾炎维持治疗期病人的影响.全科护理, 2010, 8(6):480-482.
[6]康清华.护理干预对狼疮性肾炎维持治疗期的疗效分析.医学信息旬刊, 2010, 23(12):238.
[7]徐会平.分析狼疮性肾炎维持治疗期患者应用护理干预的效果.临床医药文献电子杂志, 2015, 2(2):365-366.
[8]唐跃琼,朱其香,潘宁.系统性红斑狼疮患者的护理干预.中国实用护理杂志, 2012, 28(s2):40-41.
[9]黄惠珊,余美嫦,林宝娟.护理干预对狼疮性肾炎维持治疗期患者的影响.中国药物经济学, 2014(3):144-145.
[10]王秀凤.护理干预对狼疮性肾炎维持治疗期病人的病情影响.中国保健营养旬刊, 2013, 23(5):2518-2519.