基质配比对美国流苏容器苗生长的影响
|
摘要
以美国流苏1年生实生苗为试验材料,以泥炭、珍珠岩、蛭石、园土为基质原料,采用单形重心混料试验设计方法,共设计15种基质配方,研究各基质配比的理化性质,各处理容器苗的形态、生物量、生理指标等,以期找出最佳基质配比。结果表明:15种不同基质配方的密度,总孔隙度,pH值,全氮、全磷质量分数等理化性质差异显著;不同基质配方对美国流苏容器苗的形态、生物量和生理指标等有显著影响。综合分析结果表明:V(泥炭)∶V(珍珠岩)∶V(蛭石)=0.46∶0.27∶0.27为美国流苏容器苗最佳基质配方。
With 1-a Chionanthus virginicus seedlings,15 kinds of media formula were prepared by using the peat,perlite,vermiculite,garden soil as material with the simplex centroid mixture design,by measuring the physical-chemical properties of the substrate formula,the morphological index,biomass index,physiological index,to find the best substrate formula.There were significant differences in the physical and chemical properties of the 15 substrates including bulk density,total porosity,pH,total nitrogen,and total phosphorus; by using different substrates,there were significant differences in morphological index,biomass index and physiological index of container seedling. The comprehensive analysis result indicates that the best substrate composition is V_(peat)∶ V_(perlite)∶ V_(vermiculite)= 0.46 ∶ 0.27 ∶ 0.27.
With 1-a Chionanthus virginicus seedlings,15 kinds of media formula were prepared by using the peat,perlite,vermiculite,garden soil as material with the simplex centroid mixture design,by measuring the physical-chemical properties of the substrate formula,the morphological index,biomass index,physiological index,to find the best substrate formula.There were significant differences in the physical and chemical properties of the 15 substrates including bulk density,total porosity,pH,total nitrogen,and total phosphorus; by using different substrates,there were significant differences in morphological index,biomass index and physiological index of container seedling. The comprehensive analysis result indicates that the best substrate composition is V_(peat)∶ V_(perlite)∶ V_(vermiculite)= 0.46 ∶ 0.27 ∶ 0.27.
引文
[1]钱又宇,薛隽.世界著名观赏树木美国流苏树:美国香槐[J].园林,2009(7):66-67.
[2]GULCINI,ELIAS R,GEPDIREMEN A,et al.Antioxidant secoiridoids from fringe tree(Chionanthus virginicus L.)[J].Wood Science&Technology,2009,43(3/4):195.
[3]BOYER L,BAGHDIKIAN B,BUN S S,et al.Chionanthus virginicus L.:phytochemical analysis and quality control of herbal drug and herbal preparations[J].Natural Product Communications,2011,6(6):753-758.
[4]ILHAMI G,RIAD E,AKCAHAN G,et al.Antioxidant activity of lignans from fringe tree(Chionanthus virginicus L.)[J].European Food Research&Technology,2006,223(6):759-767.
[5]陈凤英,缪美琴,袁国胜.我国容器育苗现状及其技术发展趋势[J].林业科技开发,1989(2):1-5.
[6]施季森.迎接21世纪现代林木生物技术育种的挑战[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2000,24(1):1-6.
[7]邓华平.林木容器育苗技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008.
[8]孟玲玲,张鸽香.美国流苏种子休眠原因探析[J].广东农业科学,2015,42(6):35-39.
[9]张鸽香,孟玲玲.美国流苏种子酸蚀处理后种子结构的变化[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(10):245-247.
[10]CHAN C R.Accelerated propagation of Chionanthus virginicus via embryo culture[J].Hortscience,1999,34(1):140-141.
[11]吴秀燕,张鸽香.美国流苏离体胚的组织培养与快速繁殖[J].植物生理学报,2017,53(2):227-233.
[12]连兆煌.无土栽培原理与技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994.
[13]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2008.
[14]杨敏文.快速测定植物叶片叶绿素含量方法的探讨[J].光谱实验室,2002,19(4):478-481.
[15]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[16]马常耕.世界容器苗研究、生产现状和我国发展对策[J].世界林业研究,1994(5):33-41.
[17]乌丽雅斯,刘勇,李瑞生,等.容器育苗质量调控技术研究评述[J].世界林业研究,2004,17(2):9-13.
[18]郭世荣.固体栽培基质研究、开发现状及发展趋势[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(Z2):1-4.
[19]黄军华.不同基质对金森女贞容器苗生长的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(4):149-152.
[20]林韧安,陈秋夏,郑坚,等.不同基质配方对枫香容器苗质量的影响[J].西南林业大学学报,2012,32(1):11-16.
[21]朱锦茹,江波,袁位高,等.阔叶树容器育苗关键技术研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2006,28(5):728-733.
[22]郭杰.不同种源苦楝种苗特性和耐盐能力差异的研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2008.
[23]LI D D,SI L T,ZHANG G Y,et al.Quantitative trait loci analysis for chlorophyll content of cucumber(Cucumis sativus L.)seedlings under low-light stress[J].African Journal of Biotechnology,2010,30(9):4692-4699.
[24]傅松玲,刘胜清.容器育苗质量问题及其对策(综述)[J].安徽农业大学学报,1996,23(1):79-81.
[25]鲁敏,姜凤岐,宋轩.容器苗质量评定指标的研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(6):763-765.
[26]刘勇.苗木质量调控理论与技术[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1999.
[27]王月生,周志春,金国庆,等.基质配比对南方红豆杉容器苗及其移栽生长的影响[J].浙江林学院学报,2007,24(5):643-646.
[28]徐玉梅,王卫斌,景跃波,等.云南红豆杉育苗基质筛选试验[J].西南林学院学报,2009,29(1):45-48.
[29]马雪红,胡根长,冯建国,等.基质配比、缓释肥量和容器规格对木荷容器苗质量的影响[J].林业科学研究,2010,23(4):505-509.
[2]GULCINI,ELIAS R,GEPDIREMEN A,et al.Antioxidant secoiridoids from fringe tree(Chionanthus virginicus L.)[J].Wood Science&Technology,2009,43(3/4):195.
[3]BOYER L,BAGHDIKIAN B,BUN S S,et al.Chionanthus virginicus L.:phytochemical analysis and quality control of herbal drug and herbal preparations[J].Natural Product Communications,2011,6(6):753-758.
[4]ILHAMI G,RIAD E,AKCAHAN G,et al.Antioxidant activity of lignans from fringe tree(Chionanthus virginicus L.)[J].European Food Research&Technology,2006,223(6):759-767.
[5]陈凤英,缪美琴,袁国胜.我国容器育苗现状及其技术发展趋势[J].林业科技开发,1989(2):1-5.
[6]施季森.迎接21世纪现代林木生物技术育种的挑战[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2000,24(1):1-6.
[7]邓华平.林木容器育苗技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008.
[8]孟玲玲,张鸽香.美国流苏种子休眠原因探析[J].广东农业科学,2015,42(6):35-39.
[9]张鸽香,孟玲玲.美国流苏种子酸蚀处理后种子结构的变化[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(10):245-247.
[10]CHAN C R.Accelerated propagation of Chionanthus virginicus via embryo culture[J].Hortscience,1999,34(1):140-141.
[11]吴秀燕,张鸽香.美国流苏离体胚的组织培养与快速繁殖[J].植物生理学报,2017,53(2):227-233.
[12]连兆煌.无土栽培原理与技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994.
[13]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2008.
[14]杨敏文.快速测定植物叶片叶绿素含量方法的探讨[J].光谱实验室,2002,19(4):478-481.
[15]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[16]马常耕.世界容器苗研究、生产现状和我国发展对策[J].世界林业研究,1994(5):33-41.
[17]乌丽雅斯,刘勇,李瑞生,等.容器育苗质量调控技术研究评述[J].世界林业研究,2004,17(2):9-13.
[18]郭世荣.固体栽培基质研究、开发现状及发展趋势[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(Z2):1-4.
[19]黄军华.不同基质对金森女贞容器苗生长的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(4):149-152.
[20]林韧安,陈秋夏,郑坚,等.不同基质配方对枫香容器苗质量的影响[J].西南林业大学学报,2012,32(1):11-16.
[21]朱锦茹,江波,袁位高,等.阔叶树容器育苗关键技术研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2006,28(5):728-733.
[22]郭杰.不同种源苦楝种苗特性和耐盐能力差异的研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2008.
[23]LI D D,SI L T,ZHANG G Y,et al.Quantitative trait loci analysis for chlorophyll content of cucumber(Cucumis sativus L.)seedlings under low-light stress[J].African Journal of Biotechnology,2010,30(9):4692-4699.
[24]傅松玲,刘胜清.容器育苗质量问题及其对策(综述)[J].安徽农业大学学报,1996,23(1):79-81.
[25]鲁敏,姜凤岐,宋轩.容器苗质量评定指标的研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(6):763-765.
[26]刘勇.苗木质量调控理论与技术[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1999.
[27]王月生,周志春,金国庆,等.基质配比对南方红豆杉容器苗及其移栽生长的影响[J].浙江林学院学报,2007,24(5):643-646.
[28]徐玉梅,王卫斌,景跃波,等.云南红豆杉育苗基质筛选试验[J].西南林学院学报,2009,29(1):45-48.
[29]马雪红,胡根长,冯建国,等.基质配比、缓释肥量和容器规格对木荷容器苗质量的影响[J].林业科学研究,2010,23(4):505-509.