英语句子逻辑连贯能力与英语写作水平潜在关系研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:On the potential relationship between the logical coherence in English sentences and the English writing proficiency
  • 作者:白丽茹
  • 英文作者:BAI Liru;
  • 关键词:连贯 ; 英语句子逻辑连贯能力 ; 英语写作水平 ; 潜在关系
  • 英文关键词:coherence;;the logical coherence in English sentences;;the English writing proficiency;;the potential relationship
  • 中文刊名:NWYJ
  • 英文刊名:Foreign Languages Research
  • 机构:天津外国语大学英语学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:外语研究
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.36;No.173
  • 基金:2018年度天津外国语大学校级教学改革重点项目“中国大学生篇章逻辑连贯能力现状调查与补救策略研究”(TJWD18A02)的阶段性成果
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:NWYJ201901010
  • 页数:7
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:32-1001/H
  • 分类号:54-59+114
摘要
本研究以220名大二年级英语学习者为被试实施系列实证研究,尝试探讨英语句子逻辑连贯能力与英语写作水平的潜在关系。研究结果表明:英语句子逻辑连贯能力/技能/亚技能与英语写作水平存在显著相关,但相关程度存在个体差异;英语句子逻辑连贯认知技能和应用技能联合为英语写作水平显著预测源,其中英语句子逻辑连贯认知技能对英语写作水平贡献率相对较大;英语句子逻辑连贯亚技能联合对英语写作水平具有显著预测作用,其中英语句子逻辑匹配亚技能和英语句子逻辑监控亚技能对英语写作水平贡献率基本一致,其次为英语句子逻辑连接亚技能和英语句子逻辑识别亚技能。
        Taking 220 second-year college English majors as subjects, the present study conducts a battery of tests to investigate the potential relationship between the logical coherence in English sentences and the English writing proficiency. The results show: apart from the individual differences of the coefficients, the logical coherence and its skills/sub-skills in English sentences have significant correlation with the English writing proficiency; the cognitive skill of the logical coherence and the application skill of the logical coherence can significantly predict the English writing proficiency, and the former one performs better than the later one; the monitoring/the recognizing/the connecting/the mapping logical sub-skills are the better predicators of the English writing proficiency, of which the mapping and the monitoring logical sub-skills account for the equal variance of the English writing proficiency and after which are the connecting and the recognizing logical sub-skills.
引文
白丽茹.2017.英语写作焦虑诱发因素量表编制[J].外语界(5):74-82.
    丁往道,吴冰.2005.英语写作基础教程(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社.
    胡壮麟.1994.语篇的衔接与连贯[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社.
    胡壯麟.2018.新编语篇的衔接与连贯[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社.
    刘润清,韩宝成.2000.语言测试和它的方法(修订版)[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社.
    欧洲理事会文化合作教育委员会.2008.欧洲语言共同参考框架:学习、教学、评估[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社.
    潘玉进.2006.教育与心理统计---SPSS应用[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社.
    秦晓晴.2003.外语教学研究中的定量数据分析[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社.
    张厚粲,徐建平.2004.现代心理与教育统计学[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社.
    章振邦.2004.新编英语语法教程[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社.
    Bachman,L.F.1990.Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing[M].Shanghai:Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
    Christopher,N.C.&R.H.David.2005.Teaching and Researching Writing[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    Halliday M.A.K.2008.An Introduction to Functional Grammar[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    Quirk,R.,S.Greenbaum,G.Leech,&J.A.Svartvik.1985.Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language[M].London:Longman.
    Robins,R.H.2000.General Linguistics[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    Weigle,S.C.2011.Assessing Writing[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700