海外人才创新创业治理模式选择——基于上海和武汉的双案例比较研究
|
摘要
海外人才离岸创新创业基地建设计划的实施,为新形势下海外人才创新创业治理模式的选择提供了新思路。通过对上海和武汉基地的双案例比较分析,引入网络嵌入理论,探讨了海外人才创新创业治理模式的典型类型、主要特点和选择路径。研究结果表明:海外人才创新创业的治理模式包含政府主导型环式治理模式和市场主导型网式治理模式两种典型类型,其选择路径包括治理体系功能定位、治理主体性质选择、治理结构形成三个关键点,同时本地网络嵌入难度越大,越易形成政府主导的治理模式,并向环式结构发展。
The implementation of Overseas Talent Offshore Innovation and Entrepreneurship Center Plan provides a new way for the selection of governance mode in the current situation. By employing the comparative analysis of two cases from Shanghai and Wuhan, this paper introduces the theory of network embedding and discusses the typical types, main characteristics and selection paths of the governance mode for overseas talents' innovation and entrepreneurship. The result shows that two typical types include government-led circular mode and market-led network mode. Also, the selection path has three key decision points involving the determination of system function, governance subject and governance structure. Meanwhile, the more difficult the local network is embedded, the easier it is to form the government-led mode and develop the circular governance structure.
The implementation of Overseas Talent Offshore Innovation and Entrepreneurship Center Plan provides a new way for the selection of governance mode in the current situation. By employing the comparative analysis of two cases from Shanghai and Wuhan, this paper introduces the theory of network embedding and discusses the typical types, main characteristics and selection paths of the governance mode for overseas talents' innovation and entrepreneurship. The result shows that two typical types include government-led circular mode and market-led network mode. Also, the selection path has three key decision points involving the determination of system function, governance subject and governance structure. Meanwhile, the more difficult the local network is embedded, the easier it is to form the government-led mode and develop the circular governance structure.
引文
[1] 吴从环. 归国留学人员再本土化研究[J]. 山东社会科学,2008,22(1):126-128.
[2] Kettle D F. The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-first Century America[M]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.
[3] 苏毓昌,余致力. 廉政与治理:公共管理的迫切议题与新兴范式[J]. 复旦公共行政评论, 2012, 8(2): 150-168.
[4] Klijn, Erik-Hans. Analyzing and managing policy processes in complex networks: A theoretical examination of the concept policy network and its problems[J]. Administration & Society, 1996, 28(1): 90-119.
[5] Foutowicez S, et al. Science and governance in the European Union: A contribution to the debate[R]. Science and Public Policy, 2002.
[6] Gibbon J H, Gwin H L. Technology and governance[J]. Technology in Society, 1985, 7(4): 333-352.
[7] 曾婧婧,钟书华. 科技治理的模式:一种国际及国内视角[J]. 科学管理研究, 2011, 29(1): 37-41.
[8] 吕一博,蓝清,韩少杰. 开放式创新生态系统的成长基因——基于iOS、Android和Symbian的多案例研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015,33(5): 148-150.
[9] 李维安,林润辉,范建红. 网络治理研究前沿与述评[J]. 南开管理评论, 2014,17(5): 42-53.
[10] 武建龙,于欢欢,黄静,等. 创新生态系统研究述评[J]. 软科学,2017,31(3):1-3, 29.
[11] 李昂,汤书昆. 城市治理生态:创新视角下的内涵与建构——以苏州纳米产业生态治理为例[J]. 科技管理研究, 2016,36(24): 157-163.
[12] 何会涛,袁勇志. 海外人才跨国创业研究现状探析与未来展望——基于双重网络嵌入视角[J]. 外国经济与管理,2012,34(6):1-8.
[13] 袁勇志,肖方鑫. 双重网络嵌入对海外人才跨国创业的影响研究——基于创业阶段视角[J]. 工业技术经济,2013,32(11):45-53.
[14] 汪旭晖,张其林. 电子商务破解生鲜农产品流通困局的内在机理——基于天猫生鲜与沱沱工社的双案例比较研究[J]. 中国软科学,2016,31(2):39-55.
[15] Aldrich H E, Reese P R. Does networking pay off: A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle[A]. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research[C]. Massachusetts: Wellesley, 1993: 325-339.
[16] 曾国屏,苟尤钊,刘磊. 从“创新系统”到“创新生态系统”[J]. 科学学研究, 2013,31(1): 4-12.
[17] 董铠军. 微观视角下创新生态系统研究:概念与界定[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017,34(8): 9-14.
[18] 曹如中,史健勇,郭华,等. 区域创意产业创新生态系统演进研究:动因、模型与功能划分[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(2): 107-113.
[19] 陈健,高太山,柳卸林,等. 创新生态系统:概念、理念基础与治理[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2016,33(17): 153-160.
[20] 王臻荣. 治理结构的演变:政府、市场与民间组织的主体间关系分析[J]. 中国行政管理,2014,30(11):56-59.
[21] 曾婧婧,钟书华. 论科技治理工具[J]. 科学学研究,2011,29(6): 801-807.
[22] 余明桂,回雅甫,潘红波. 政治联系、寻租与地方政府财政补贴有效性[J]. 经济研究,2010,56(3):65-77.
[23] Luo Y D. Shifts of Chinese government policies on inbound foreign direct investment[J]. Strategy Management Journal, 2008,9(4): 291-314.
[2] Kettle D F. The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-first Century America[M]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.
[3] 苏毓昌,余致力. 廉政与治理:公共管理的迫切议题与新兴范式[J]. 复旦公共行政评论, 2012, 8(2): 150-168.
[4] Klijn, Erik-Hans. Analyzing and managing policy processes in complex networks: A theoretical examination of the concept policy network and its problems[J]. Administration & Society, 1996, 28(1): 90-119.
[5] Foutowicez S, et al. Science and governance in the European Union: A contribution to the debate[R]. Science and Public Policy, 2002.
[6] Gibbon J H, Gwin H L. Technology and governance[J]. Technology in Society, 1985, 7(4): 333-352.
[7] 曾婧婧,钟书华. 科技治理的模式:一种国际及国内视角[J]. 科学管理研究, 2011, 29(1): 37-41.
[8] 吕一博,蓝清,韩少杰. 开放式创新生态系统的成长基因——基于iOS、Android和Symbian的多案例研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015,33(5): 148-150.
[9] 李维安,林润辉,范建红. 网络治理研究前沿与述评[J]. 南开管理评论, 2014,17(5): 42-53.
[10] 武建龙,于欢欢,黄静,等. 创新生态系统研究述评[J]. 软科学,2017,31(3):1-3, 29.
[11] 李昂,汤书昆. 城市治理生态:创新视角下的内涵与建构——以苏州纳米产业生态治理为例[J]. 科技管理研究, 2016,36(24): 157-163.
[12] 何会涛,袁勇志. 海外人才跨国创业研究现状探析与未来展望——基于双重网络嵌入视角[J]. 外国经济与管理,2012,34(6):1-8.
[13] 袁勇志,肖方鑫. 双重网络嵌入对海外人才跨国创业的影响研究——基于创业阶段视角[J]. 工业技术经济,2013,32(11):45-53.
[14] 汪旭晖,张其林. 电子商务破解生鲜农产品流通困局的内在机理——基于天猫生鲜与沱沱工社的双案例比较研究[J]. 中国软科学,2016,31(2):39-55.
[15] Aldrich H E, Reese P R. Does networking pay off: A panel study of entrepreneurs in the research triangle[A]. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research[C]. Massachusetts: Wellesley, 1993: 325-339.
[16] 曾国屏,苟尤钊,刘磊. 从“创新系统”到“创新生态系统”[J]. 科学学研究, 2013,31(1): 4-12.
[17] 董铠军. 微观视角下创新生态系统研究:概念与界定[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017,34(8): 9-14.
[18] 曹如中,史健勇,郭华,等. 区域创意产业创新生态系统演进研究:动因、模型与功能划分[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(2): 107-113.
[19] 陈健,高太山,柳卸林,等. 创新生态系统:概念、理念基础与治理[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2016,33(17): 153-160.
[20] 王臻荣. 治理结构的演变:政府、市场与民间组织的主体间关系分析[J]. 中国行政管理,2014,30(11):56-59.
[21] 曾婧婧,钟书华. 论科技治理工具[J]. 科学学研究,2011,29(6): 801-807.
[22] 余明桂,回雅甫,潘红波. 政治联系、寻租与地方政府财政补贴有效性[J]. 经济研究,2010,56(3):65-77.
[23] Luo Y D. Shifts of Chinese government policies on inbound foreign direct investment[J]. Strategy Management Journal, 2008,9(4): 291-314.