知识产权国际规则的内在逻辑、发展趋势与中国应对
|
摘要
在经济全球化的背景下,知识产权国际规则的内在逻辑,已经远远超出财产权的私权讨论范畴,更多地呈现在围绕贸易、投资、话语等方面的规则属性与逻辑表达。国际经贸格局的演变、国际关系中的实力变化,以及私人集团的国际影响力等因素都影响着知识产权国际规则的发展趋势。此外,以多边体系为主的运作机制和多领域扩展的应用范围,以及更加公平、合理的规范体系,仍然是知识产权国际规则的未来走势。然而,考虑到当下"逆全球化"的氛围以及贸易保护主义的影响,一方面,需要积极维护知识产权的多边贸易体制,不断提升我国的国际话语实力;另一方面,需要有效推进"一带一路"建设,不断强化我国的知识产权核心竞争力,提高软实力并且不断优化营商环境。
In the context of economic globalization,the inherent logic of intellectual property international rules has gone far beyond the discussion of private rights of property rights,and more often expressed in the rules and logic of trade, investment,discourse and so on. The evolution of the international economic and trade pattern,the changes in the strength of international relations,and the international influence of private groups all influence the development trend of international intellectual property rules. In addition,the operating mechanism based on the multilateral system and the scope of application of multi-disciplinary expansion,as well as a more fair and reasonable normative system,remain the future trend of international intellectual property rules. However,considering the current "anti-globalization" atmosphere and the influence of trade protectionism,on the one hand,it is necessary to actively maintain the multilateral trading system of intellectual property rights and continuously enhance China's international discourse power; on the other hand,it is necessary to effectively promote the "Belt and Road Initiative", continuously strengthen the core competitiveness of China's intellectual property rights,improve the soft power and optimize the business environment.
In the context of economic globalization,the inherent logic of intellectual property international rules has gone far beyond the discussion of private rights of property rights,and more often expressed in the rules and logic of trade, investment,discourse and so on. The evolution of the international economic and trade pattern,the changes in the strength of international relations,and the international influence of private groups all influence the development trend of international intellectual property rules. In addition,the operating mechanism based on the multilateral system and the scope of application of multi-disciplinary expansion,as well as a more fair and reasonable normative system,remain the future trend of international intellectual property rules. However,considering the current "anti-globalization" atmosphere and the influence of trade protectionism,on the one hand,it is necessary to actively maintain the multilateral trading system of intellectual property rights and continuously enhance China's international discourse power; on the other hand,it is necessary to effectively promote the "Belt and Road Initiative", continuously strengthen the core competitiveness of China's intellectual property rights,improve the soft power and optimize the business environment.
引文
[1][澳]彼得·达沃豪斯,约翰·布雷斯韦特.刘雪涛译.信息封建主义[M].知识产权出版社,2005. 43.
[2]See Peter Drahos,Thinking strategically about intellectual property rights,Telecommunications Polio.,Vol.21,No. 3,202,1997.
[3]吴汉东.知识产权国际保护制度的变革与发展[J].法学研究,2005,(3):129.
[4][美]约翰·H.戈尔斯坦,等.贸易体制的演进——GATT与WTO体制中的政治学、法学和经济学[M].北京大学出版社,2013. 230.
[5]张建邦.国际投资条约知识产权保护制度的现代转型研究[J].中国法学,2013,(4):63.
[6]陈正良,等.国际话语权本质析论——兼论中国在提升国际话语权上的应有作为[J].浙江社会科学,2014,(7):79.
[7]古祖雪.从体制转换到体制协调:TRIPS的矫正之路——以发展中国家的视角[J].法学家,2012,(1):146.
[8]贾格迪什·巴格瓦蒂.雷薇译.现代自由贸易[M].中信出版社,2003. 37-39.
[9]张乃根.“一带一路”倡议下的国际经贸规则之重构[J].法学,2016,(5):96-98.
[10]杜颖.知识产权国际保护制度的新发展及中国路径选择[J].法学家,2016,(3):114.
[11]詹映.国际贸易体制区域化背景下知识产权国际立法新动向[J].国际经贸探索,2016,(4):99.
[12]张晓君.国际经贸规则发展的新趋势与中国的立场[J].现代法学,2014,(3):154.
[13]See Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan,Protecting Intellectual Property under BITs,FTAs,and TRIPS:Conflicting Regimes or Mutual Coherence,Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property,Competition Tax law Research Paper Series No. 11-02,pp. 10-12,2011.
[14]范超.知识产权保护全球化体制变革与我国的应对策略[J].国际贸易,2014,(1):27.
[15]Peter K. Yu,TPP and Trans-Pacific Perplexities[J]. 37 Fordham International Law Journal 1129,p. 1136,2014.
[16]李俊,崔艳新.新一轮国际知识产权规则重构下的中国选择[J].知识产权,2015,(12):10.
[17]Jerome H. Reichman,Intellectual Property in the Twenty-first Century:Will the Developing Countries Lead or Follow?,46 Houston Law Review 1116,p. 1176,2009.
[18]Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan,The International Law Relation Between TRIPS and Subsequent TRIPS-plus Free Trade Agreements:Towards Safe Guarding TRIPS Flexibilities? Vol. 18,No. 2,p. 3,2011.
[19]潘皞宇.论知识产权国际化的保护模式及我国的应对策略[J].法学评论,2015,(1):154.
[20][美]苏姗·K·赛尔.董刚,等译.私权、功法——知识产权的全球化[M].中国人民大学出版社,2008. 1-3.
[21]马忠法.国际知识产权法律制度的演变本质与中国应对[J].社会科学辑刊,2017,(6):116.
[22]Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan and Annette Kur,Enough is Enough-The Notion of Binding Ceilings in Intellectual Property Protection,Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property,Competition? Tax law Research Paper Series No. 09-01,P8,2009.
[23][美]贾格迪什·巴格沃蒂.王世华,等译.贸易保护主义[M].中国人民大学出版社,2010. 30.
[24]刘笋.知识产权保护在国际投资法中的地位[J].河北法学,2001,(3):47.
[25]张茉楠.“特朗普主义”下的逆全球化冲击与新的全球化机遇[N].中国经济时报,2017-02-16.
[26]马一德.创新驱动发展与知识产权战略实施[J].中国法学,2013,(4):29.
[27]赵骏.全球治理视野下的国际法治与国内政治[J].中国社会科学,2014,(10):83.
[28]吴汉东.“一带一路”战略下知识产权保护的中国选择[J].人民论坛,2017,(3):94.
(1)关于“体制转移”的表述,参见Laurence R. Helfer,Regime Shifting:The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Law Making,29 Yale J. Int’l L. 1,PP. 13-24,2004.
(1)关于知识产权的多元属性,即知识产权有着私人产权、特别人权、无形资产和公共政策的属性特点。参见吴汉东:《知识产权的多元属性及其研究范式》,载《中国社会科学》,2011年第5期。
(2)Chad Jones,Anatomy of an iP hone—Where does your money go? August,2014.转引自普华永道:《特普朗当选美国总统对中美双边贸易可能带来的影响》,2017年版,第6页。
(1)参见《国家知识产权战略纲要》序言,国发[2008]18号。
(1)根据中美两国于2018年5月19日在华盛顿就双边经贸磋商发表的联合声明,“双方高度重视知识产权保护,同意加强合作”。
[2]See Peter Drahos,Thinking strategically about intellectual property rights,Telecommunications Polio.,Vol.21,No. 3,202,1997.
[3]吴汉东.知识产权国际保护制度的变革与发展[J].法学研究,2005,(3):129.
[4][美]约翰·H.戈尔斯坦,等.贸易体制的演进——GATT与WTO体制中的政治学、法学和经济学[M].北京大学出版社,2013. 230.
[5]张建邦.国际投资条约知识产权保护制度的现代转型研究[J].中国法学,2013,(4):63.
[6]陈正良,等.国际话语权本质析论——兼论中国在提升国际话语权上的应有作为[J].浙江社会科学,2014,(7):79.
[7]古祖雪.从体制转换到体制协调:TRIPS的矫正之路——以发展中国家的视角[J].法学家,2012,(1):146.
[8]贾格迪什·巴格瓦蒂.雷薇译.现代自由贸易[M].中信出版社,2003. 37-39.
[9]张乃根.“一带一路”倡议下的国际经贸规则之重构[J].法学,2016,(5):96-98.
[10]杜颖.知识产权国际保护制度的新发展及中国路径选择[J].法学家,2016,(3):114.
[11]詹映.国际贸易体制区域化背景下知识产权国际立法新动向[J].国际经贸探索,2016,(4):99.
[12]张晓君.国际经贸规则发展的新趋势与中国的立场[J].现代法学,2014,(3):154.
[13]See Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan,Protecting Intellectual Property under BITs,FTAs,and TRIPS:Conflicting Regimes or Mutual Coherence,Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property,Competition Tax law Research Paper Series No. 11-02,pp. 10-12,2011.
[14]范超.知识产权保护全球化体制变革与我国的应对策略[J].国际贸易,2014,(1):27.
[15]Peter K. Yu,TPP and Trans-Pacific Perplexities[J]. 37 Fordham International Law Journal 1129,p. 1136,2014.
[16]李俊,崔艳新.新一轮国际知识产权规则重构下的中国选择[J].知识产权,2015,(12):10.
[17]Jerome H. Reichman,Intellectual Property in the Twenty-first Century:Will the Developing Countries Lead or Follow?,46 Houston Law Review 1116,p. 1176,2009.
[18]Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan,The International Law Relation Between TRIPS and Subsequent TRIPS-plus Free Trade Agreements:Towards Safe Guarding TRIPS Flexibilities? Vol. 18,No. 2,p. 3,2011.
[19]潘皞宇.论知识产权国际化的保护模式及我国的应对策略[J].法学评论,2015,(1):154.
[20][美]苏姗·K·赛尔.董刚,等译.私权、功法——知识产权的全球化[M].中国人民大学出版社,2008. 1-3.
[21]马忠法.国际知识产权法律制度的演变本质与中国应对[J].社会科学辑刊,2017,(6):116.
[22]Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan and Annette Kur,Enough is Enough-The Notion of Binding Ceilings in Intellectual Property Protection,Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property,Competition? Tax law Research Paper Series No. 09-01,P8,2009.
[23][美]贾格迪什·巴格沃蒂.王世华,等译.贸易保护主义[M].中国人民大学出版社,2010. 30.
[24]刘笋.知识产权保护在国际投资法中的地位[J].河北法学,2001,(3):47.
[25]张茉楠.“特朗普主义”下的逆全球化冲击与新的全球化机遇[N].中国经济时报,2017-02-16.
[26]马一德.创新驱动发展与知识产权战略实施[J].中国法学,2013,(4):29.
[27]赵骏.全球治理视野下的国际法治与国内政治[J].中国社会科学,2014,(10):83.
[28]吴汉东.“一带一路”战略下知识产权保护的中国选择[J].人民论坛,2017,(3):94.
(1)关于“体制转移”的表述,参见Laurence R. Helfer,Regime Shifting:The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Law Making,29 Yale J. Int’l L. 1,PP. 13-24,2004.
(1)关于知识产权的多元属性,即知识产权有着私人产权、特别人权、无形资产和公共政策的属性特点。参见吴汉东:《知识产权的多元属性及其研究范式》,载《中国社会科学》,2011年第5期。
(2)Chad Jones,Anatomy of an iP hone—Where does your money go? August,2014.转引自普华永道:《特普朗当选美国总统对中美双边贸易可能带来的影响》,2017年版,第6页。
(1)参见《国家知识产权战略纲要》序言,国发[2008]18号。
(1)根据中美两国于2018年5月19日在华盛顿就双边经贸磋商发表的联合声明,“双方高度重视知识产权保护,同意加强合作”。