心理护理在不同文化层次不孕症患者中的应用效果对比
|
摘要
目的分析对比心理护理在不同文化层次不孕症患者中的应用效果。方法随机选择本院2016年5月~2017年5月收治的120例不孕症患者作为研究对象,根据不同的文化层次将其分为实验组(大专以上学历)、观察组(高中及初中学历)、对照组(小学学历),各40例。所有患者均实施常规护理+心理护理,分析对比护理效果。结果三组护理后的负面心理评分均低于护理前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组护理后的负面心理评分明显低于观察组及对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三组护理后的家庭功能评分、社会适应性评分均高于护理前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组护理后的家庭功能评分、社会适应性评分明显高于观察组及对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在不孕症患者临床护理中,针对不同文化层次患者实施心理护理干预,既可改善负面心理,又可提高患者家庭功能评分及社会适应性评分,且文化层次越高,护理效果越好,临床应用价值较高,值得推广。
Objective To analyze and compare the application effect of psychological nursing on infertile patients at different cultural levels.Methods A total of 120 patients with infertility who were admitted to our hospital from May 2016 to May 2017 were randomly selected as study subjects.According to different cultural levels,they were divided into the experimental group(college degree or above),the observation group(high school and junior middle school education)and the control group(primary school education),40 patients in each groups.All patients were treated with routine nursing and psychological nursing.The effect of nursing was analyzed and compared.Results The negative psychology of the three groups after nursing was lower than that before nursing,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The negative psychological score after nursing in the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the observation group and the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After nursing,family function scores and social adaptability scores of the three groups were higher than those before nursing,the difference was statistically significant(P <0.05).The family function scores and social adaptability scores of the experimental group after nursing were significantly higher than those of the observation group and the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion In the clinical nursing of patients with infertility,psychological nursing interventions for patients of different cultural levels can not only improve the negative psychology,but also improve the family function scores and social adaptability scores.The higher the cultural level,the better the nursing effect,with high clinical application value,it is worth promoting.
Objective To analyze and compare the application effect of psychological nursing on infertile patients at different cultural levels.Methods A total of 120 patients with infertility who were admitted to our hospital from May 2016 to May 2017 were randomly selected as study subjects.According to different cultural levels,they were divided into the experimental group(college degree or above),the observation group(high school and junior middle school education)and the control group(primary school education),40 patients in each groups.All patients were treated with routine nursing and psychological nursing.The effect of nursing was analyzed and compared.Results The negative psychology of the three groups after nursing was lower than that before nursing,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The negative psychological score after nursing in the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the observation group and the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After nursing,family function scores and social adaptability scores of the three groups were higher than those before nursing,the difference was statistically significant(P <0.05).The family function scores and social adaptability scores of the experimental group after nursing were significantly higher than those of the observation group and the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion In the clinical nursing of patients with infertility,psychological nursing interventions for patients of different cultural levels can not only improve the negative psychology,but also improve the family function scores and social adaptability scores.The higher the cultural level,the better the nursing effect,with high clinical application value,it is worth promoting.
引文
[1]陈大琼,罗春,王青梅,等.针对不同文化层次的不孕症患者实施心理护理干预的可行性研究[J].中外女性健康研究,2017,25(23):143-144.
[2]余发丽.心理护理和健康教育在宫腹腔镜联合治疗不孕症的应用[J].延安大学学报(医学科学版),2017,15(2):77-79.
[3]万小琴,成叶红,赵美英.心理护理对宫腔镜联合手术治疗不孕症患者的重要性及其临床价值[J].当代医学,2017,23(9):152-153.
[4]赵雪丽,赵丽丽.不孕症患者心理护理干预效果的评价[J].临床护理杂志,2017,16(1):60-61.
[5]王美.对不孕症患者实施心理护理的干预效果评价[J].中国继续医学教育,2016,8(32):247-249.
[6]廖光华.辅助生殖中心理护理对不孕症患者妊娠结局的影响[J].临床合理用药杂志,2016,9(31):89-90.
[7]Yusuf AJ,Maitama HY,Amedu MA,et al.Socio-demographic correlates of psychological distress among male patients with infertility in Zaria,Nigeria[J].Afr J Urol,2012,18(4):170-174.
[8]闫旻.心理护理在辅助生殖中对妊娠结局的影响[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,15(33):21-22.
[9]周琪.不孕症患者的心理特点及心理护理原则[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,15(80):252.
[10]付琴,陈娟,罗丽娟,等.浅析心理护理在不孕症患者情绪的影响分析[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,15(23):234,239.
[11]曹莹丽,李琼,宋玉梅.不孕症患者心理情况调查及护理干预分析[J].医学信息,2017,30(24):124-125.
[12]王萍华,阮琼芬,杨蕊,等.循征护理在输卵管性不孕症患者心理护理中的应用[J].云南医药,2017,60(1):96-98.
[13]张静梅.不孕症患者实施人工授精手术前后心理护理干预效果[J].中国现代药物应用,2017,11(17):183-184.
[14]Pankaj V,Rajesh R,Soumya S,et al.Psychiatric morbidity in infertility patients in a tertiary care setup[J].J Clin Diagn Res,2015,9(9):VC01-VC06.
[15]徐玉娟.全面护理对宫腔镜、腹腔镜联合治疗不孕症围术期的影响[J].中国现代医生,2016,54(24):160-162.
[16]秦明芳.心理护理干预不孕症患者的系统评价[J].广西中医药大学学报,2016,19(2):147-151.
[17]Saso S,Clarke A,Bracewell-Milnes T,et al.Psychological issues associated with absolute uterine factor infertility and attitudes of patients toward uterine transplantation[J].Prog Transplant,2016,26(1):28-39.
[2]余发丽.心理护理和健康教育在宫腹腔镜联合治疗不孕症的应用[J].延安大学学报(医学科学版),2017,15(2):77-79.
[3]万小琴,成叶红,赵美英.心理护理对宫腔镜联合手术治疗不孕症患者的重要性及其临床价值[J].当代医学,2017,23(9):152-153.
[4]赵雪丽,赵丽丽.不孕症患者心理护理干预效果的评价[J].临床护理杂志,2017,16(1):60-61.
[5]王美.对不孕症患者实施心理护理的干预效果评价[J].中国继续医学教育,2016,8(32):247-249.
[6]廖光华.辅助生殖中心理护理对不孕症患者妊娠结局的影响[J].临床合理用药杂志,2016,9(31):89-90.
[7]Yusuf AJ,Maitama HY,Amedu MA,et al.Socio-demographic correlates of psychological distress among male patients with infertility in Zaria,Nigeria[J].Afr J Urol,2012,18(4):170-174.
[8]闫旻.心理护理在辅助生殖中对妊娠结局的影响[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,15(33):21-22.
[9]周琪.不孕症患者的心理特点及心理护理原则[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,15(80):252.
[10]付琴,陈娟,罗丽娟,等.浅析心理护理在不孕症患者情绪的影响分析[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,15(23):234,239.
[11]曹莹丽,李琼,宋玉梅.不孕症患者心理情况调查及护理干预分析[J].医学信息,2017,30(24):124-125.
[12]王萍华,阮琼芬,杨蕊,等.循征护理在输卵管性不孕症患者心理护理中的应用[J].云南医药,2017,60(1):96-98.
[13]张静梅.不孕症患者实施人工授精手术前后心理护理干预效果[J].中国现代药物应用,2017,11(17):183-184.
[14]Pankaj V,Rajesh R,Soumya S,et al.Psychiatric morbidity in infertility patients in a tertiary care setup[J].J Clin Diagn Res,2015,9(9):VC01-VC06.
[15]徐玉娟.全面护理对宫腔镜、腹腔镜联合治疗不孕症围术期的影响[J].中国现代医生,2016,54(24):160-162.
[16]秦明芳.心理护理干预不孕症患者的系统评价[J].广西中医药大学学报,2016,19(2):147-151.
[17]Saso S,Clarke A,Bracewell-Milnes T,et al.Psychological issues associated with absolute uterine factor infertility and attitudes of patients toward uterine transplantation[J].Prog Transplant,2016,26(1):28-39.