起落架落震试验中缓冲系统投放功量修正方法研究
|
摘要
起落架落震试验中,投放功量与测试功量的比对用于验证测试系统是否正常,传统的投放功量的计算忽略了起落架弹性支撑质量与非弹性支撑质量重心位移不一致,导致投放功量的计算有一定的误差。建立起落架二质量模型,指出传统计算方法的不足,改进了投放功量的计算方法,并对比了落震试验中几种不同重量级的起落架在改进算法前后测试误差的区别。结果表明:测试误差修正前后的差值约0.15%~1.28%,在小型起落架落震试验中差异较大。同时,考虑了投放锁开锁延迟以及导轮与立柱摩擦带来的下沉速度损耗,对某型起落架落震试验中的下沉速度实时监测,提出了一种试验中适用的监测、修正下沉速度的试验方法,对比了下沉速度修正前后测试误差的变化,试验证明这种方法有效减少了测试误差,误差计算精度提高了约4%。
It is known that comparing the energy between released energy and measured energy in the landing gear drop test can verify whether the measuring system works properly or not.However,the traditional method to calculate the released energy neglected a fact that the supporting elastic displacement and inelastic displacement is not inconsistent,which causes some errors in the calculation.The current study makes adjustment to the method of calculating released energy and compares the errors of landing gears with different weight in the traditional method and correction method.Results obtained show that the difference before and after the correction method is about 0.15%to 1.28%and there is great difference between the error of micro landing gears in the traditional method and correction method.Meanwhile,considering the waste of subsidence velocity caused by the delay of released lock and friction between the impeller and pillar,the subsidence velocity in the landing gear drop test is monitored and an experiment method for monitoring and correcting subsidence velocity is proposed.The comparison of the errors between the test by traditional method and proposed method shows that the method can effectively reduce the error and improve the accuracy.
It is known that comparing the energy between released energy and measured energy in the landing gear drop test can verify whether the measuring system works properly or not.However,the traditional method to calculate the released energy neglected a fact that the supporting elastic displacement and inelastic displacement is not inconsistent,which causes some errors in the calculation.The current study makes adjustment to the method of calculating released energy and compares the errors of landing gears with different weight in the traditional method and correction method.Results obtained show that the difference before and after the correction method is about 0.15%to 1.28%and there is great difference between the error of micro landing gears in the traditional method and correction method.Meanwhile,considering the waste of subsidence velocity caused by the delay of released lock and friction between the impeller and pillar,the subsidence velocity in the landing gear drop test is monitored and an experiment method for monitoring and correcting subsidence velocity is proposed.The comparison of the errors between the test by traditional method and proposed method shows that the method can effectively reduce the error and improve the accuracy.
引文
[1]刘锐琛,苏开鑫,邵永起,等.飞机起落架强度设计指南[M].四川:四川科学技术出版社,1989:711-732.(LIU Ruichen,SU Kaixin,SHAO Yongqi,et al.Aircraft landing gear strength design guide[M].Sichuan:Sichuan Science Press,1989:711-732(in Chinese)).
[2]齐丕骞,史惟琦,戚志民,等.起落架落震试验中的仿升动力模拟[J].机械科学与技术,2002,21(S1):36-37.(QI Piqian,SHI Weiqi,QI Zhimin,et al.Wing lift simulation in landing-gear drop test[J].Mechanical Science and Technology,2002,21(S1):36-37(in Chinese)).
[3]CFTE,ATFAI,NAAU.军用飞机结构强度规范第9部分:地面试验:GJB67A-2008[S].北京:总装备部军标出版发行部,2008.(CFTE,ATFAI,NAAU.Military airplane strength specification Part 9:Ground tests:GJB67A-2008[S].Beijing:General Armament Department Military Standard Publishing Department,2008(in Chinese)).
[4]齐丕骞,牟让科.起落架缓冲性能分析、试验、设计一体化技术[J].航空学报,1998,19(3):70-76.(QI Piqian,MU Rangke.Integration of shock absorber performance analysis,test and design of aircraft landing gears[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,1998,19(3):70-76(in Chinese)).
[5]史海文,邢誉峰.飞机起落架机轮水平载荷的测量方法[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2004,7(30):593-596.(SHI Haiwen,XING Yufeng.Measurement of horizontal load subjected to aeroplane undercarriage tire[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2004,7(30):593-596(in Chinese)).
[6]孙福强,刘群根,胡伟利.起落架落震试验轮胎压缩测量技术概述[J].测控技术,2013,32(9):4-8.(SUN Fuqiang,LIU Qungen,HU Weili.The technology overview of the tyre compression measurement in the landing gear drop test[J].Measurement&Control Technology,2013,32(9):4-8(in Chinese)).
[7]杨建波,杨正权.Lab VIEW在起落架落震试验中的应用[J].测控技术,2013,32(10):112-115.(YANG Jianbo,YANG Zhengquan.The application of Lab VIEW in landing gear drop test system[J].Measurement&Control Technology,2013,32(10):112-115(in Chinese)).
[2]齐丕骞,史惟琦,戚志民,等.起落架落震试验中的仿升动力模拟[J].机械科学与技术,2002,21(S1):36-37.(QI Piqian,SHI Weiqi,QI Zhimin,et al.Wing lift simulation in landing-gear drop test[J].Mechanical Science and Technology,2002,21(S1):36-37(in Chinese)).
[3]CFTE,ATFAI,NAAU.军用飞机结构强度规范第9部分:地面试验:GJB67A-2008[S].北京:总装备部军标出版发行部,2008.(CFTE,ATFAI,NAAU.Military airplane strength specification Part 9:Ground tests:GJB67A-2008[S].Beijing:General Armament Department Military Standard Publishing Department,2008(in Chinese)).
[4]齐丕骞,牟让科.起落架缓冲性能分析、试验、设计一体化技术[J].航空学报,1998,19(3):70-76.(QI Piqian,MU Rangke.Integration of shock absorber performance analysis,test and design of aircraft landing gears[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,1998,19(3):70-76(in Chinese)).
[5]史海文,邢誉峰.飞机起落架机轮水平载荷的测量方法[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2004,7(30):593-596.(SHI Haiwen,XING Yufeng.Measurement of horizontal load subjected to aeroplane undercarriage tire[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2004,7(30):593-596(in Chinese)).
[6]孙福强,刘群根,胡伟利.起落架落震试验轮胎压缩测量技术概述[J].测控技术,2013,32(9):4-8.(SUN Fuqiang,LIU Qungen,HU Weili.The technology overview of the tyre compression measurement in the landing gear drop test[J].Measurement&Control Technology,2013,32(9):4-8(in Chinese)).
[7]杨建波,杨正权.Lab VIEW在起落架落震试验中的应用[J].测控技术,2013,32(10):112-115.(YANG Jianbo,YANG Zhengquan.The application of Lab VIEW in landing gear drop test system[J].Measurement&Control Technology,2013,32(10):112-115(in Chinese)).