我国高校创新效率评价研究:八大区域视角
|
摘要
高校创新是社会进步的引擎,是新常态下转变经济发展模式、克服增长乏力的关键。因此,如何在创新资源有限的硬约束下进一步提升高校创新效率,是国家创新体系构建过程中不可回避的问题。文章对"十二五"期间我国31个省级行政单位面板数据进行实证研究,发现我国高校创新效率整体呈非DEA有效,纯技术效率较低是制约高校创新综合效率的直接原因。同时,高校创新效率及分解指标的核密度估计结果表明:高校创新技术效率"双峰"态势显著、规模效率"单峰"态势显著,而纯技术效率分布曲线形态较多变,表明技术效率双极聚集、规模效率省域差异显著、纯技术效率波动较大。最后,文章基于八大综合经济区视角系统剖析影响高校创新效率的内外部因素后得出以下结论:经济环境、社会文化环境、制度环境是影响高校创新效率的主要外因,内部治理结构、绩效考核方式、成果转化机制等是影响高校创新效率的主要内因。最后,文章据此提出了改善和优化高校创新效率的对策建议。
Innovation is the first driving force for development and the strategic support in building a modern economic system.As one of the three basic research subjects,universities are not only the source of subversive and cutting-edge innovations,but also the key to transformation of technological innovation into growth mode innovation. And universities have extensive and far-reaching impact on industrial development,economic progress and production mode change. Therefore,university innovation is considered to be the engine of social progress and plays a key role in transforming the economic development model and overcoming the lack of growth. Under the rigid constraints of limited innovation resources,how to further improve the innovation efficiency of universities is an unavoidable problem in the process of building national innovation system.Firstly,taking R&D funds and R&D personnel as innovation input variables,and the number of scientific papers and patent applications as innovation output variables,this paper calculates university innovation efficiency of 31 provincial administrative units in China during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period. During the sample period,and finds that the innovation efficiency of universities in China is not DEA effective as a whole,with an efficiency of 69. 64%. The technical efficiency of the university innovation fluctuated greatly and increased first and then decreased,reaching the highest value in 2013. The technical efficiency of the university innovation fluctuated greatly and increased first and then decreased,reaching the highest value in 2013. The scale efficiency of innovation in universities is better than the technical efficiency. The highest value is 93. 08%,the lowest value is 88.33%,and the fluctuation is not prominent. At the same time,the scale efficiency of Jiangsu,Henan,Ningxia and Xinjiang is close to 1. The pure technical efficiency of university innovation is low,the average value is only 76. 64%,and the fluctuation is prominent. The overall increase is followed by the scale efficiency,indicating that there are more technical inefficiencies in the research activities of Chinese universities during the sample period,resulting in low efficiency of pure technology. Hunan,Jilin,Gansu,Guizhou,Fujian,and Inner Mongolia contributed the most to the improvement of pure technology efficiency. In addition,compared to 2013,up to 20 provinces' pure technical efficiency of innovation in universities declines in 2015. Therefore,the optimization of the structure of scientific research personnel and the rational allocation of funds for innovation activities need to be strengthened. Among them,Zhejiang and Chongqing have the largest declines. Therefore,the decline of pure technical efficiency is the direct cause for increase and decreases of the efficiency of innovative technologies in Chinese universities form some eastern and central regions.From the perspective of the eight comprehensive economic zones,the regional differences in innovation efficiency of universities are more significant,showing the highest distribution in the west and the lowest in the east. The universities in the Northwest Comprehensive Economic Zone have the highest innovation efficiency,which is 1. 5 times that of the Northeast Comprehensive Economic Zone. Based on the factor input quantity and configuration structure considerations,the innovation efficiency of universities in Shanghai,Guangdong and other regions fluctuated greatly during the sample period. The innovation efficiency of universities in Heilongjiang,Beijing and Anhui was deteriorating,and the innovation efficiency of universities in Tianjin and Shanxi was significant.At the same time,the paper makes a detailed examination of the dynamic evolution trend of university innovation efficiency and decomposition index by density estimation. It is found that during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period,the nuclear density distribution curve of university innovation technical efficiency in China has shifted to the right and presented a significant " two peak" trend,indicating that the innovation efficiency of some provinces is gathering at low values,and some of them are moving toward high values,but the overall trend of university innovation efficiency is optimized,and the provincial differences are getting smaller. The pure technical efficiency of Chinese university innovation and was"two peak"before 2013,indicating that the pure technical efficiency is bipolar. After 2013,the left-peak height of the innovative pure technical efficiency distribution curve of universities increased significantly and the width changed from flat to steep,indicating that the pure technical efficiency of university innovation has generally deteriorated during 2014-2015. In 2011-2013,scale efficiency nuclear density distribution curve of Chinese university innovation increased highly,and the width changed from flat to steep. This indicates that the overall scale efficiency of university innovation has not been significantly improved in this period,but the difference in scale efficiency between universities has decreased. The peak height of the nuclear density distribution curve drops again,and the width changes from steep to flat,indicating that the efficiency of scale deteriorates and the provincial differences of university innovation become larger.Finally,the paper uses R&D redundancy and R&D staff redundancy as the dependent variables,and uses the SFA model to examine the impact of regional innovation environment on university innovation efficiency from the perspective of the eight comprehensive economic zones. We find that economic environment,social and cultural environment,institutional environment are the main external causes affecting the innovation efficiency of universities. The imbalance of the number of elements and the configuration structure caused by the heterogeneity of innovation environment is the main external factor of the innovation elements' redundancy in universities. In addition,the mismatch between the factors of the eastern university system,internal governance structure,performance evaluation method and achievement transformation mechanism are important internal factors for the redundancy of R&D personnel in the east. The repeated investment in R&D expenditures in the western universities and the unsound budget management has aggravated the redundancy of R&D funds in the west after the loss of talents. And then the paper proposes countermeasures to improve and optimize the innovation efficiency of universities.
Innovation is the first driving force for development and the strategic support in building a modern economic system.As one of the three basic research subjects,universities are not only the source of subversive and cutting-edge innovations,but also the key to transformation of technological innovation into growth mode innovation. And universities have extensive and far-reaching impact on industrial development,economic progress and production mode change. Therefore,university innovation is considered to be the engine of social progress and plays a key role in transforming the economic development model and overcoming the lack of growth. Under the rigid constraints of limited innovation resources,how to further improve the innovation efficiency of universities is an unavoidable problem in the process of building national innovation system.Firstly,taking R&D funds and R&D personnel as innovation input variables,and the number of scientific papers and patent applications as innovation output variables,this paper calculates university innovation efficiency of 31 provincial administrative units in China during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period. During the sample period,and finds that the innovation efficiency of universities in China is not DEA effective as a whole,with an efficiency of 69. 64%. The technical efficiency of the university innovation fluctuated greatly and increased first and then decreased,reaching the highest value in 2013. The technical efficiency of the university innovation fluctuated greatly and increased first and then decreased,reaching the highest value in 2013. The scale efficiency of innovation in universities is better than the technical efficiency. The highest value is 93. 08%,the lowest value is 88.33%,and the fluctuation is not prominent. At the same time,the scale efficiency of Jiangsu,Henan,Ningxia and Xinjiang is close to 1. The pure technical efficiency of university innovation is low,the average value is only 76. 64%,and the fluctuation is prominent. The overall increase is followed by the scale efficiency,indicating that there are more technical inefficiencies in the research activities of Chinese universities during the sample period,resulting in low efficiency of pure technology. Hunan,Jilin,Gansu,Guizhou,Fujian,and Inner Mongolia contributed the most to the improvement of pure technology efficiency. In addition,compared to 2013,up to 20 provinces' pure technical efficiency of innovation in universities declines in 2015. Therefore,the optimization of the structure of scientific research personnel and the rational allocation of funds for innovation activities need to be strengthened. Among them,Zhejiang and Chongqing have the largest declines. Therefore,the decline of pure technical efficiency is the direct cause for increase and decreases of the efficiency of innovative technologies in Chinese universities form some eastern and central regions.From the perspective of the eight comprehensive economic zones,the regional differences in innovation efficiency of universities are more significant,showing the highest distribution in the west and the lowest in the east. The universities in the Northwest Comprehensive Economic Zone have the highest innovation efficiency,which is 1. 5 times that of the Northeast Comprehensive Economic Zone. Based on the factor input quantity and configuration structure considerations,the innovation efficiency of universities in Shanghai,Guangdong and other regions fluctuated greatly during the sample period. The innovation efficiency of universities in Heilongjiang,Beijing and Anhui was deteriorating,and the innovation efficiency of universities in Tianjin and Shanxi was significant.At the same time,the paper makes a detailed examination of the dynamic evolution trend of university innovation efficiency and decomposition index by density estimation. It is found that during the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period,the nuclear density distribution curve of university innovation technical efficiency in China has shifted to the right and presented a significant " two peak" trend,indicating that the innovation efficiency of some provinces is gathering at low values,and some of them are moving toward high values,but the overall trend of university innovation efficiency is optimized,and the provincial differences are getting smaller. The pure technical efficiency of Chinese university innovation and was"two peak"before 2013,indicating that the pure technical efficiency is bipolar. After 2013,the left-peak height of the innovative pure technical efficiency distribution curve of universities increased significantly and the width changed from flat to steep,indicating that the pure technical efficiency of university innovation has generally deteriorated during 2014-2015. In 2011-2013,scale efficiency nuclear density distribution curve of Chinese university innovation increased highly,and the width changed from flat to steep. This indicates that the overall scale efficiency of university innovation has not been significantly improved in this period,but the difference in scale efficiency between universities has decreased. The peak height of the nuclear density distribution curve drops again,and the width changes from steep to flat,indicating that the efficiency of scale deteriorates and the provincial differences of university innovation become larger.Finally,the paper uses R&D redundancy and R&D staff redundancy as the dependent variables,and uses the SFA model to examine the impact of regional innovation environment on university innovation efficiency from the perspective of the eight comprehensive economic zones. We find that economic environment,social and cultural environment,institutional environment are the main external causes affecting the innovation efficiency of universities. The imbalance of the number of elements and the configuration structure caused by the heterogeneity of innovation environment is the main external factor of the innovation elements' redundancy in universities. In addition,the mismatch between the factors of the eastern university system,internal governance structure,performance evaluation method and achievement transformation mechanism are important internal factors for the redundancy of R&D personnel in the east. The repeated investment in R&D expenditures in the western universities and the unsound budget management has aggravated the redundancy of R&D funds in the west after the loss of talents. And then the paper proposes countermeasures to improve and optimize the innovation efficiency of universities.
引文
[1]焦翠红,孙海波,董直庆.R&D资源配置效率演化及研发补贴效应---来自制造业的经验证据[J].山西财经大学学报,2017,39(2):58-71.Jiao Cuihong,Sun Haibo,Dong Zhiqing.The evolution of R&D efficiency and effect of government subsidies---The empirical evidence from Chinese manufactring sector[J].Journal of Shanxi Finance and Economics University,2017,39(2):58-71.
[2]Park E.Higher education and innovation[M]//Encyclopedia of Creativity,Invention,Innovation and Entrepreneurship.Springer New York,2013:850-862.
[3]Barra C,Zotti R.Measuring efficiency in higher education:An empirical study using a bootstrapped data envelopment analysis[J].International Advances in Economic Research,2016,22(1):01-23.
[4]Lee K,Chen J,Li J,et al.Better innovation,better future:Working together for innovating Asia[J].Asian Journal of Technology Innovation,2017,25(1):01-04.
[5]顾淑林,方新,孙玉麟,等.基础研究的作用和规律[J].科研管理,1991(2):07-11.Gu Shulin,Fang Xin,Sun Yulin,et al.The role and law of basic research[J].Science Research Management,1991(2):07-11.
[6]Li H C,Wu S P,Fan S J.A research of high-tech industry's original innovation system and evaluation of the system's creative capability[C]//International Conference on Management Science&Engineering.IEEE,2014:1738-1746.
[7]冯宝军,孙秀峰,刘小君.基于SFA法的高校成本效率评价研究---以教育部直属高校为例的分析[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2015(3):06-13.Feng Baojun,Sun Xiufeng,Liu Xiaojun.Research on cost efficiency evaluation of subordinate universities of ministry of education based on SFA[J].Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences),2015(3):06-13.
[8]索玮岚,陆桂昌,陈锐.高校科技资源配置效率测度研究---基于共享投入关联网络DEA模型[J].科研管理,2015,36(11):155-161.Suo Weilan,Lu Guichang,Chen Rui.A study of efficiency measurement of S&T resource allocation in universities based on the relational network DEA model with shared inputs[J].Science Research Management,2015,36(11):155-161.
[9]宋维玮,邹蔚.湖北省高校科技创新效率评价研究[J].科研管理,2016(s1):257-263.Song Weiwei,Zou Wei.A research on Hubei universities'technology innovation efficiency[J].Science Research Management,2016(s1):257-263.
[10]于洋,周洪宇,程时雄.我国各省高等院校创新效率的测度[J].统计与决策,2017(22):104-107.Yu Yang,Zhou Hongyu,Cheng Shixiong.The measurement of the innovation efficiency of the universities in China[J].Statistics and Decision,2017(22):104-107.
[11]谈毅,杨晔,白伊贝.政府科技投入对高校创新产出影响的实证研究---基于2004-2013年的数据[J].财政研究,2014(12):53-57.TanYi,Yang Ye,Bai Yibei.An empirical study on the impact of government investment in science and technology on innovative output in Universities--Based on data of 2004-2013 years[J].Public Finance Research,2014(12):53-57.
[12]乔联宝.基于联合DEA模型的“985”高校科研-教学综合效率评价[J].科研管理,2015(s1):210-215.Qiao Lianbao.A research and teaching comprehensive efficiency evaluation of the“985 Project”universities based on the joint DEA model[J].Science Research Management,2015(s1):210-215.
[13]王燕,吴蒙,李想.我国高校人才培养、科学研究与社会服务效率研究---基于超效率的三阶段DEA模型[J].教育发展研究,2016(1):39-47.Wang Yan,Wu Meng,Li Xiang.Evaluation of main functions'efficiency of state-run universities:A three-stage DEA-based study[J].Exploring Education Development,2016(1):39-47.
[14]Agasisti T,Belfield C.Efficiency in the community college sector:Stochastic frontier analysis[J].2014:1-23.
[15]Munoz D A.Assessing the research efficiency of higher education institutions in Chile:A data envelopment analysis approach[J].International Journal of Educational Management,2016,30(6):809-825.
[16]Cohen W M,Levinthal D A.Innovation and learning:The two faces of R&D[J].Economic Journal,1989,99(397):569-596.
[17]余冬筠,金祥荣.创新主体的创新效率区域比较研究[J].科研管理,2014,35(3):51-57.Yu Dongyun,Jin Xiangrong.Innovation efficiency evaluation of the innovation subjects and their regional difference[J].Science Research Management,2014,35(3):51-57.
[18]于志军,杨昌辉,白羽,等.成果类型视角下高校创新效率及影响因素研究[J].科研管理,2017,38(5):141-149.Yu Zhijun,Yang Changhui,Bai Yu,et al.A research on the S&T innovation efficiency and its influencing factors of Chinese colleges from the perspective of innovation types[J].Science Research Management,2017,38(5):141-149.
[19]Hu Y,Liang W,Tang Y.Exploring factors impacting on research efficiency in“211 Project”Universities[M]//Evaluating Research Efficiency of Chinese Universities.Springer Singapore,2017,p.261-273.
[20]Nasierowski W,Arcelus F J.Interrelationships among the elements of national innovation systems:A statistical evaluation[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1999,119(2):235-253.
[21]沈能,宫为天.我国省区高校科技创新效率评价实证分析---基于三阶段DEA模型[J].科研管理,2013(s1):125-132.Shen Neng,Gong Weitian.Evaluationand spatial patterns ofuniversity's innovation efficiency in China based on threestage DEA model[J].Science Research Management,2013(s1):125-132.
[22]刘兴凯,左小娟.我国高校科研效率的区域性特征及影响因素分析---基于三阶段DEA方法的实证研究[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2015(5):77-83.Liu Xingkai,Zuo Xiaojuan.The analysis of regional features and influence factors on the research efficiency of Chinese universities---An empirical study based on the three stage DEA[J].Journal of National Academy of Education Administration,2015(5):77-83.
[23]Montresor S,Vezzani A.The production function of top R&Dinvestors:Accounting for size and sector heterogeneity with quantile estimations[J].Research Policy,2015,44(2):381-393.
[24]赵晓阳,刘金兰.基于DEA视窗分析的高校科研投入产出效率动态评价[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2013(2):132-138.Zhao Xiaoyang,Liu Jinlan.Dynamic evaluation of university research activity efficiency based on DEA window analysis[J].Journal of Xidian University(Social Sciences Edition),2013(2):132-138.
[25]张惠琴,尚甜甜.高校科研创新效率对比分析---基于全国30个省份的面板数据[J].科研管理,2015(s1):181-186.Zhang Huiqin,Shang Tiantian.A comparative analysis of China's university research innovation efficiency based on the panel data from 30 provinces and cities[J].Science Research Management,2015(s1):181-186.
[26]王树乔,王惠,李锋.“985工程”高校科研效率动态演进及区域比较[J].科技管理研究,2016,36(17):87-92.Wang Shuqiao,Wang Hui,Liu Feng.The dynamic evolution of the scientific research efficiency and regional differences of“Project 985”universities of China[J].Science and Technology Management Research,2016,36(17):87-92.
[27]王树乔,王惠,祖维.江苏省高校科研效率的测算及动态演进[J].高教发展与评估,2017,33(1):56-66+103+128-129.Wang Shuqiao,Wang Hui,Zu Wei.Analysis and dynamic evolution of the scientific research efficiency of universities in Jiangsu Province[J].Higher Education Development and E-valuation,2017,33(1):56-66+103+128-129.
[28]Chadee D,Roxas B.Institutional environment,innovation capacity and firm performance in Russia[J].Critical Perspectives on International Business,2013,9(1/2):19-39.
[29]Bhutto A,Rashdi P I,Abro Q M.Indicators for science and technology policy in Pakistan:Entering the science,technology and innovation paradigm[J].Science&Public Policy,2012,39(1).
[30]左铠瑞,宫建成.中国区域R&D效率变化测度及其影响因素研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(4):79-88.Zuo Kairui,Gong Jiancheng.Exploring the change and influence factors of R&D efficiency at province-level of China[J].Science of Science and Management of S.&T.,2016,37(4):79-88.
[31]刘锋.关于“十一五”规划区域划分的思考[EB/OL]:http:/http://www.drc.gov.cn/dcyjbg/20050427/75-224-30980.htm,2005-04-27.Lin Feng.Thonghts on regional division of"Eleventh FiveYear Plan"[EB/OL]:http:/http://www.drc.gov.cn/dcyjbg/20050427/75-224-30980.htm,2005-04-27.
[32]B Silverman.Density estimation for statistic and data analysis[M].1986,Chapter 4:01-20.
[33]刘娜娜,王效俐,韩海彬.高校科技创新与高技术产业创新耦合协调发展的时空特征及驱动机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(10):59-70.Liu Nana,Wang Xiaoli,Han Haibin.An analysis on the driving mechanism and spatial-temporal characteristics of the coupling coordinated development between science and technology innovation in universities and innovation in high-technology industries[J].Science of Science and Management of S.&T.,2015,36(10):59-70.
[34]Lin S.Are ivory towers truly ivory?Knowledge spillovers and firm innovation[J].Journal of Economics&Business,2015,80:21-36.
[35]冉爱晶,周晓雪,肖咪咪.我国中小企业组织创新氛围的架构和异质性研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(5):72-84.Ran Aijing,Zhou Xiaoxue,Xiao Mimi.Dimensions and heterogeneity of organizational innovative climate in Chinese small and medium scale enterprises[J].Science of Science and Management of S.&T.,2017,38(5):72-84.
[36]Blind K,Grupp H.Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions:Empirical findings and policy consequences[J].Research Policy,1999,28(5):451-468.
[37]Fritsch M,Franke G.Innovation,regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation[J].Research Policy,2004,33(2):245-255.
[38]张德茗,谢葆生.理工农医类高校R&D投入对企业技术创新的知识溢出效应分析[J].科研管理,2014,35(10):136-143.Zhang Deming,Xie Baosheng.Analysis on knowledge spillover of R&D investment in universities of technology,agriculture and medicine on enterprise technical innovation[J].Science Research Management,2014,35(10):136-143.
[39]Matsunaga N,Anan I,Forsgren S,Nagai R,Rosenberg P,Horiuchi S,Ando Y,Suhr OB.Prospective education for an innovation economy[J].On the Horizon,2002,10(1):17-22.
[40]Kumbhakar S C,Ortegaargilés R,Potters L,et al.Corporate R&D and firm efficiency:Evidence from Europe’s top R&Dinvestors[J].Journal of Productivity Analysis,2012,37(2):125-140.
[41]Cao C,Li L.Reforming China's S&T system[J].Science,2013,341(6145):460-462.
[42]Andrade T H N D,Silva L R D,Gitahy L.New policies for science and technology and the impacts on public research institutes:A case study in Brazil[J].Brazilian Political Science Review,2013,7(2):37-61.
[43]Sergeev N.High-priority directions of modernization of university education in innovational society[J].International Journal of Educational Management,2017,31(1):56-61.
[44]Zhou Y,Guo Y,Liu Y.High-level talent flow and its influence on regional unbalanced development in China[J].Applied Geography,2018,91:89-98.
[45]何洁,王灏晨,郑晓瑛.高校科技人才流动意愿现况及相关因素分析[J].人口与发展,2014,20(3):24-32.He Jie,Wang Haochen,Zheng Xiaoying.Analysis on current status and association factors of willingness to flow of sci-tech talents in universities[J].Population and Development,2014,20(3):24-32.
[46]刘善仕,孙博,葛淳棉,等.人力资本社会网络与企业创新---基于在线简历数据的实证研究[J].管理世界,2017(7):88-98.Liu Shanshi,Sun Bo,Ge Chunmian,et al.Human capital network and firm innovation:A study based on the resume data of linkedIn[J].Management World,2017(7):88-98.
[47]覃雄合,杜德斌,刘树峰.中国省际高校科研成果转化效率时空格局与影响因素---基于网络SBM模型的评价[J].地理研究,2017,36(9):1641-1652.Tan Xionghe,Du Debin,Liu Shufeng.Spatial-temporal pattern and influencing factors in transforming efficiency of scientific research achievements of universities on a provincial scale in China based on the network SBM method[J].Geographical Research,2017,36(9):1641-1652.
(1)节选自习近平主席在全国科技创新大会、两院院士大会、中国科协第九次全国代表大会讲话。
(1)模型1-9分别测量创新环境对全国整体、东北综合经济区、北部沿海综合经济区、东部沿海综合经济区、南部沿海综合经济区、黄河中游综合经济区、长江中游综合经济区、大西北综合经济区、大西南综合经济区的影响。
[2]Park E.Higher education and innovation[M]//Encyclopedia of Creativity,Invention,Innovation and Entrepreneurship.Springer New York,2013:850-862.
[3]Barra C,Zotti R.Measuring efficiency in higher education:An empirical study using a bootstrapped data envelopment analysis[J].International Advances in Economic Research,2016,22(1):01-23.
[4]Lee K,Chen J,Li J,et al.Better innovation,better future:Working together for innovating Asia[J].Asian Journal of Technology Innovation,2017,25(1):01-04.
[5]顾淑林,方新,孙玉麟,等.基础研究的作用和规律[J].科研管理,1991(2):07-11.Gu Shulin,Fang Xin,Sun Yulin,et al.The role and law of basic research[J].Science Research Management,1991(2):07-11.
[6]Li H C,Wu S P,Fan S J.A research of high-tech industry's original innovation system and evaluation of the system's creative capability[C]//International Conference on Management Science&Engineering.IEEE,2014:1738-1746.
[7]冯宝军,孙秀峰,刘小君.基于SFA法的高校成本效率评价研究---以教育部直属高校为例的分析[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2015(3):06-13.Feng Baojun,Sun Xiufeng,Liu Xiaojun.Research on cost efficiency evaluation of subordinate universities of ministry of education based on SFA[J].Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences),2015(3):06-13.
[8]索玮岚,陆桂昌,陈锐.高校科技资源配置效率测度研究---基于共享投入关联网络DEA模型[J].科研管理,2015,36(11):155-161.Suo Weilan,Lu Guichang,Chen Rui.A study of efficiency measurement of S&T resource allocation in universities based on the relational network DEA model with shared inputs[J].Science Research Management,2015,36(11):155-161.
[9]宋维玮,邹蔚.湖北省高校科技创新效率评价研究[J].科研管理,2016(s1):257-263.Song Weiwei,Zou Wei.A research on Hubei universities'technology innovation efficiency[J].Science Research Management,2016(s1):257-263.
[10]于洋,周洪宇,程时雄.我国各省高等院校创新效率的测度[J].统计与决策,2017(22):104-107.Yu Yang,Zhou Hongyu,Cheng Shixiong.The measurement of the innovation efficiency of the universities in China[J].Statistics and Decision,2017(22):104-107.
[11]谈毅,杨晔,白伊贝.政府科技投入对高校创新产出影响的实证研究---基于2004-2013年的数据[J].财政研究,2014(12):53-57.TanYi,Yang Ye,Bai Yibei.An empirical study on the impact of government investment in science and technology on innovative output in Universities--Based on data of 2004-2013 years[J].Public Finance Research,2014(12):53-57.
[12]乔联宝.基于联合DEA模型的“985”高校科研-教学综合效率评价[J].科研管理,2015(s1):210-215.Qiao Lianbao.A research and teaching comprehensive efficiency evaluation of the“985 Project”universities based on the joint DEA model[J].Science Research Management,2015(s1):210-215.
[13]王燕,吴蒙,李想.我国高校人才培养、科学研究与社会服务效率研究---基于超效率的三阶段DEA模型[J].教育发展研究,2016(1):39-47.Wang Yan,Wu Meng,Li Xiang.Evaluation of main functions'efficiency of state-run universities:A three-stage DEA-based study[J].Exploring Education Development,2016(1):39-47.
[14]Agasisti T,Belfield C.Efficiency in the community college sector:Stochastic frontier analysis[J].2014:1-23.
[15]Munoz D A.Assessing the research efficiency of higher education institutions in Chile:A data envelopment analysis approach[J].International Journal of Educational Management,2016,30(6):809-825.
[16]Cohen W M,Levinthal D A.Innovation and learning:The two faces of R&D[J].Economic Journal,1989,99(397):569-596.
[17]余冬筠,金祥荣.创新主体的创新效率区域比较研究[J].科研管理,2014,35(3):51-57.Yu Dongyun,Jin Xiangrong.Innovation efficiency evaluation of the innovation subjects and their regional difference[J].Science Research Management,2014,35(3):51-57.
[18]于志军,杨昌辉,白羽,等.成果类型视角下高校创新效率及影响因素研究[J].科研管理,2017,38(5):141-149.Yu Zhijun,Yang Changhui,Bai Yu,et al.A research on the S&T innovation efficiency and its influencing factors of Chinese colleges from the perspective of innovation types[J].Science Research Management,2017,38(5):141-149.
[19]Hu Y,Liang W,Tang Y.Exploring factors impacting on research efficiency in“211 Project”Universities[M]//Evaluating Research Efficiency of Chinese Universities.Springer Singapore,2017,p.261-273.
[20]Nasierowski W,Arcelus F J.Interrelationships among the elements of national innovation systems:A statistical evaluation[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1999,119(2):235-253.
[21]沈能,宫为天.我国省区高校科技创新效率评价实证分析---基于三阶段DEA模型[J].科研管理,2013(s1):125-132.Shen Neng,Gong Weitian.Evaluationand spatial patterns ofuniversity's innovation efficiency in China based on threestage DEA model[J].Science Research Management,2013(s1):125-132.
[22]刘兴凯,左小娟.我国高校科研效率的区域性特征及影响因素分析---基于三阶段DEA方法的实证研究[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2015(5):77-83.Liu Xingkai,Zuo Xiaojuan.The analysis of regional features and influence factors on the research efficiency of Chinese universities---An empirical study based on the three stage DEA[J].Journal of National Academy of Education Administration,2015(5):77-83.
[23]Montresor S,Vezzani A.The production function of top R&Dinvestors:Accounting for size and sector heterogeneity with quantile estimations[J].Research Policy,2015,44(2):381-393.
[24]赵晓阳,刘金兰.基于DEA视窗分析的高校科研投入产出效率动态评价[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2013(2):132-138.Zhao Xiaoyang,Liu Jinlan.Dynamic evaluation of university research activity efficiency based on DEA window analysis[J].Journal of Xidian University(Social Sciences Edition),2013(2):132-138.
[25]张惠琴,尚甜甜.高校科研创新效率对比分析---基于全国30个省份的面板数据[J].科研管理,2015(s1):181-186.Zhang Huiqin,Shang Tiantian.A comparative analysis of China's university research innovation efficiency based on the panel data from 30 provinces and cities[J].Science Research Management,2015(s1):181-186.
[26]王树乔,王惠,李锋.“985工程”高校科研效率动态演进及区域比较[J].科技管理研究,2016,36(17):87-92.Wang Shuqiao,Wang Hui,Liu Feng.The dynamic evolution of the scientific research efficiency and regional differences of“Project 985”universities of China[J].Science and Technology Management Research,2016,36(17):87-92.
[27]王树乔,王惠,祖维.江苏省高校科研效率的测算及动态演进[J].高教发展与评估,2017,33(1):56-66+103+128-129.Wang Shuqiao,Wang Hui,Zu Wei.Analysis and dynamic evolution of the scientific research efficiency of universities in Jiangsu Province[J].Higher Education Development and E-valuation,2017,33(1):56-66+103+128-129.
[28]Chadee D,Roxas B.Institutional environment,innovation capacity and firm performance in Russia[J].Critical Perspectives on International Business,2013,9(1/2):19-39.
[29]Bhutto A,Rashdi P I,Abro Q M.Indicators for science and technology policy in Pakistan:Entering the science,technology and innovation paradigm[J].Science&Public Policy,2012,39(1).
[30]左铠瑞,宫建成.中国区域R&D效率变化测度及其影响因素研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(4):79-88.Zuo Kairui,Gong Jiancheng.Exploring the change and influence factors of R&D efficiency at province-level of China[J].Science of Science and Management of S.&T.,2016,37(4):79-88.
[31]刘锋.关于“十一五”规划区域划分的思考[EB/OL]:http:/http://www.drc.gov.cn/dcyjbg/20050427/75-224-30980.htm,2005-04-27.Lin Feng.Thonghts on regional division of"Eleventh FiveYear Plan"[EB/OL]:http:/http://www.drc.gov.cn/dcyjbg/20050427/75-224-30980.htm,2005-04-27.
[32]B Silverman.Density estimation for statistic and data analysis[M].1986,Chapter 4:01-20.
[33]刘娜娜,王效俐,韩海彬.高校科技创新与高技术产业创新耦合协调发展的时空特征及驱动机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(10):59-70.Liu Nana,Wang Xiaoli,Han Haibin.An analysis on the driving mechanism and spatial-temporal characteristics of the coupling coordinated development between science and technology innovation in universities and innovation in high-technology industries[J].Science of Science and Management of S.&T.,2015,36(10):59-70.
[34]Lin S.Are ivory towers truly ivory?Knowledge spillovers and firm innovation[J].Journal of Economics&Business,2015,80:21-36.
[35]冉爱晶,周晓雪,肖咪咪.我国中小企业组织创新氛围的架构和异质性研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(5):72-84.Ran Aijing,Zhou Xiaoxue,Xiao Mimi.Dimensions and heterogeneity of organizational innovative climate in Chinese small and medium scale enterprises[J].Science of Science and Management of S.&T.,2017,38(5):72-84.
[36]Blind K,Grupp H.Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions:Empirical findings and policy consequences[J].Research Policy,1999,28(5):451-468.
[37]Fritsch M,Franke G.Innovation,regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation[J].Research Policy,2004,33(2):245-255.
[38]张德茗,谢葆生.理工农医类高校R&D投入对企业技术创新的知识溢出效应分析[J].科研管理,2014,35(10):136-143.Zhang Deming,Xie Baosheng.Analysis on knowledge spillover of R&D investment in universities of technology,agriculture and medicine on enterprise technical innovation[J].Science Research Management,2014,35(10):136-143.
[39]Matsunaga N,Anan I,Forsgren S,Nagai R,Rosenberg P,Horiuchi S,Ando Y,Suhr OB.Prospective education for an innovation economy[J].On the Horizon,2002,10(1):17-22.
[40]Kumbhakar S C,Ortegaargilés R,Potters L,et al.Corporate R&D and firm efficiency:Evidence from Europe’s top R&Dinvestors[J].Journal of Productivity Analysis,2012,37(2):125-140.
[41]Cao C,Li L.Reforming China's S&T system[J].Science,2013,341(6145):460-462.
[42]Andrade T H N D,Silva L R D,Gitahy L.New policies for science and technology and the impacts on public research institutes:A case study in Brazil[J].Brazilian Political Science Review,2013,7(2):37-61.
[43]Sergeev N.High-priority directions of modernization of university education in innovational society[J].International Journal of Educational Management,2017,31(1):56-61.
[44]Zhou Y,Guo Y,Liu Y.High-level talent flow and its influence on regional unbalanced development in China[J].Applied Geography,2018,91:89-98.
[45]何洁,王灏晨,郑晓瑛.高校科技人才流动意愿现况及相关因素分析[J].人口与发展,2014,20(3):24-32.He Jie,Wang Haochen,Zheng Xiaoying.Analysis on current status and association factors of willingness to flow of sci-tech talents in universities[J].Population and Development,2014,20(3):24-32.
[46]刘善仕,孙博,葛淳棉,等.人力资本社会网络与企业创新---基于在线简历数据的实证研究[J].管理世界,2017(7):88-98.Liu Shanshi,Sun Bo,Ge Chunmian,et al.Human capital network and firm innovation:A study based on the resume data of linkedIn[J].Management World,2017(7):88-98.
[47]覃雄合,杜德斌,刘树峰.中国省际高校科研成果转化效率时空格局与影响因素---基于网络SBM模型的评价[J].地理研究,2017,36(9):1641-1652.Tan Xionghe,Du Debin,Liu Shufeng.Spatial-temporal pattern and influencing factors in transforming efficiency of scientific research achievements of universities on a provincial scale in China based on the network SBM method[J].Geographical Research,2017,36(9):1641-1652.
(1)节选自习近平主席在全国科技创新大会、两院院士大会、中国科协第九次全国代表大会讲话。
(1)模型1-9分别测量创新环境对全国整体、东北综合经济区、北部沿海综合经济区、东部沿海综合经济区、南部沿海综合经济区、黄河中游综合经济区、长江中游综合经济区、大西北综合经济区、大西南综合经济区的影响。