唐末董昌研究三题
|
摘要
通过对相关史料的梳理和唐末政治生态的考察,纠正了学人对董昌部分事迹的错误看法,认为(1)唐末越州较杭州在政治地位、城池等重要方面的优势推动了董昌的弃杭就越行为;(2)887~895年董昌与钱镠维持着和平局面,相对劣势的钱氏对董昌礼敬有加;(3)称帝并非董昌失败的主要原因,唐廷对其"纵归田里"的惩治意见触及到钱镠的既得利益,遂在钱氏的决意讨伐下衰亡。
Based on the historical materials collected and the political ecology in the late Tang dynasty investigation,the paper rectifies some scholars' mistaken views about part of Dong Chang's achievements: 1) compared with Hangzhou and Yuezhou from the aspects of their political status and scale of the city,the advantages of Yuezhou made Dong Chang give upHangzhou; 2) during the period of 887 ~ 895 BC,Dong Chang and Qian Liu tried to keep peace with each other,and Qian showed his respect to Dong since Qian was at a disadvantage; 3) proclaiming himself an emperor was not the main reason for Dong's failure,the Tang Government's punishment on him to "return hometown"made Qian offended,what's more,Qian liu's interests was affected,which made Qian's mind to crusade against Dong.
Based on the historical materials collected and the political ecology in the late Tang dynasty investigation,the paper rectifies some scholars' mistaken views about part of Dong Chang's achievements: 1) compared with Hangzhou and Yuezhou from the aspects of their political status and scale of the city,the advantages of Yuezhou made Dong Chang give upHangzhou; 2) during the period of 887 ~ 895 BC,Dong Chang and Qian Liu tried to keep peace with each other,and Qian showed his respect to Dong since Qian was at a disadvantage; 3) proclaiming himself an emperor was not the main reason for Dong's failure,the Tang Government's punishment on him to "return hometown"made Qian offended,what's more,Qian liu's interests was affected,which made Qian's mind to crusade against Dong.
引文
[1]司马光.资治通鉴[M].北京:中华书局,1956.
[2]何勇强.钱氏吴越国史论稿[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2002.
[3]杨渭生.略论东南雄藩钱镠[J].浙江万里学院学报,2003(3):40-44.
[4]欧阳修,宋祁.新唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975.
[5]董诰,阮元,徐松,等.全唐文[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[6]杜牧.樊川文集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1978:246.
[7]郁贤皓.唐刺史考全编[M].合肥:安徽大学出版社,2000:2010.
[8]彭定求,沈三曾,杨中讷,等.全唐诗[M].北京:中华书局,1960:4599.
[9]钱俨.吴越备史[M].李最欣,校点.杭州:杭州出版社,2004.
[10]刘闯.防御与扩张:唐末五代吴越钱氏筑城之时空解析[J].中国历史地理论丛,2017(2):137-143.
[11]刘闯.与潮水的抗争——从钱镠“射潮”看五代时期杭州地区居民的生存环境[J].原生态民族文化学刊,2014(4):14-20.
[12]王象之.舆地纪胜[M].北京:中华书局,1992:107.
[13]钱文选.钱氏家乘[M].上海:上海书店,1996:186.
[14]路振.九国志[M].吴在庆,吴嘉祺,校点.杭州:杭州出版社,2004:3275.
[15]赵绍祖.新旧唐书互证[M].北京:中华书局,1985:68.
[16]赵雅书.五代吴越国的创建者——钱镠[J].台北:国立台湾大学历史学系学报,1980(7):163-214.
[17]陶懋炳.五代史略[M].北京:人民出版社,1985:121.
[2]何勇强.钱氏吴越国史论稿[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2002.
[3]杨渭生.略论东南雄藩钱镠[J].浙江万里学院学报,2003(3):40-44.
[4]欧阳修,宋祁.新唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975.
[5]董诰,阮元,徐松,等.全唐文[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[6]杜牧.樊川文集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1978:246.
[7]郁贤皓.唐刺史考全编[M].合肥:安徽大学出版社,2000:2010.
[8]彭定求,沈三曾,杨中讷,等.全唐诗[M].北京:中华书局,1960:4599.
[9]钱俨.吴越备史[M].李最欣,校点.杭州:杭州出版社,2004.
[10]刘闯.防御与扩张:唐末五代吴越钱氏筑城之时空解析[J].中国历史地理论丛,2017(2):137-143.
[11]刘闯.与潮水的抗争——从钱镠“射潮”看五代时期杭州地区居民的生存环境[J].原生态民族文化学刊,2014(4):14-20.
[12]王象之.舆地纪胜[M].北京:中华书局,1992:107.
[13]钱文选.钱氏家乘[M].上海:上海书店,1996:186.
[14]路振.九国志[M].吴在庆,吴嘉祺,校点.杭州:杭州出版社,2004:3275.
[15]赵绍祖.新旧唐书互证[M].北京:中华书局,1985:68.
[16]赵雅书.五代吴越国的创建者——钱镠[J].台北:国立台湾大学历史学系学报,1980(7):163-214.
[17]陶懋炳.五代史略[M].北京:人民出版社,1985:121.