不同形态聚磷酸铵种肥同播对大豆、小麦生长及养分累积的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Effects of Different Forms of Ammonium Polyphosphate Seed Fertilizer on Growth and Nutrient Accumulation of Soybean and Wheat
  • 作者:杨依彬 ; 陈小娟 ; 邓兰生 ; 张承林
  • 英文作者:YANG Yibin;CHEN Xiaojuan;DENG Lansheng;ZHANG Chenglin;College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University;
  • 关键词:磷酸一铵 ; 聚磷酸铵 ; 大豆 ; 小麦 ; 养分累积量
  • 英文关键词:monoammonium phosphate;;ammonium polyphosphate;;soybean;;wheat;;nutrient accumulation
  • 中文刊名:GDNY
  • 英文刊名:Guangdong Agricultural Sciences
  • 机构:华南农业大学资源环境学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-07-12 09:51
  • 出版单位:广东农业科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.46
  • 基金:国家重点研发项目(2016YFD0200404)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GDNY201906008
  • 页数:7
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:44-1267/S
  • 分类号:58-64
摘要
【目的】研究不同形态的聚磷酸铵作为种肥在石灰性土壤上对大豆、小麦苗期生长及养分累积的影响。【方法】通过盆栽试验,以不施肥作对照,磷酸一铵(MAP)、不同形态聚磷酸铵(液体型简称APPL,固体型简称APPS)作为种肥,探讨不同磷源对大豆、小麦养分累积的影响。【结果】液体聚磷酸铵(APPL)处理明显促进大豆生长,其地上部干重较固体聚磷酸铵(APPS)处理显著增加48.2%,固体聚磷酸铵(APPS)处理则对小麦生长效果最好,其地上部干重较APPL处理增加34.9%;APPL处理大豆地上部磷累积量最大,显著高出APPS处理38.8%;不同形态磷肥条件下,APPS处理对小麦的生物量以及对磷、钙、镁养分的吸收量最高,APPL处理次之,MAP处理效果最差,APPS处理地上部磷累积量较APPL处理高18.7%,是MAP处理的2.5倍。【结论】在本试验条件下,以MAP处理作对照,APPL处理大豆肥效最佳,地上部干重是对照的2倍多;APPS处理小麦肥效最好,其地上部干重较对照显著增加79.3%。
        【Objective】The effects of different forms of ammonium polyphosphate as seed fertilizer on the growth and nutrient accumulation of soybean and wheat seedlings in calcareous soil were studied.【Method】 Pot experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of different phosphorus sources on nutrient accumulation of soybean and wheat by using monoammonium phosphate(MAP) and different forms of ammonium polyphosphate(APPL for liquid and APPS for solid) as seed fertilizers with no fertilization as control. 【Result】 APPL treatment significantly promoted the growth of soybean, and the shoot dry weight was increased by 48.2% compared with that of APPS treatment, while APPS treatment was the best for the growth effect of wheat and its shoot dry weight increased by 34.9% compared with APPL treatment. The accumulation of phosphorus in soybean shoots treated with APPL was the highest, significantly higher than that of APPS treatment by 38.8%.Under different forms of phosphorus fertilizer, the biomass of wheat and the uptake of phosphorus, calcium and magnesium in APPS treatment were the highest, followed by APPL treatment, and the effect of MAP treatment was the worst. The accumulation of phosphorus in soybean shoots treated with APPS was 18.7% higher than that of APPL treatment, which was 2.5 times higher than that of MAP treatment. 【Conclusion】 Under the experimental conditions, taking MAP treatment as control group, the fertilizer efficiency of APPL treatment was the best for soybean, and the shoot dry weight was two times higher than that of control group. The fertilizer efficiency of APPS treatment was the best for wheat, and the shoot dry weight was increased by 79.3% compared with that of MAP treatment.
引文
[1]亢龙飞,褚贵新.聚磷酸铵肥料生产工艺及其关键性状表征[J].磷肥与复肥,2018,33(9):13-18.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6220.2018.09.005.KANG L F,ZHU G X.Production process and characterization of key properties of ammonium polyphosphate fertilizer[J].Phosphate&Compound Fertilizer,2018,33(9):13-18.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6220.2018.09.005.
    [2]王凤霞,刘旭,杨俊,胡国涛,陶绍程,龙庆兰,李会勇.农用聚磷酸铵研究概况[J].云南化工,2018,45(3):1-3.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-275X.2018.03.001.WANG F X,LIU X,YANG J,HU G T,TAO S C,LONG Q L,LI HY.Research overview of agricultural ammonium polyphosphate[J].Yunnan Chemical Technology,2018,45(3):1-3.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-275X.2018.03.001.
    [3]DOMINGO S.Improvement of polyphosphates as soil fertilizers[D].Kansas State University,1985.
    [4]TiSDALE S L,BEATON W L.Soil fertility and fertilizers[M].S.I:Collier Macmillan Publishers,1985:172-174.
    [5]陈小娟,杨依彬,龚林,张承林.种肥同播聚磷酸铵施用距离对玉米苗期生长的影响[J].磷肥与复肥,2018,33(4):37-40.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6220.2018.04.015.CHEN X J,YANG Y B,GONG L,ZHANG C L.Effects of Ammonium Polyphosphate Application Distance on Maize Seedling Growth[J].Phosphate&Compound Fertilizer,2018,33(4):37-40.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6220.2018.04.015.
    [6]DICK R P,TABATABAI M A.Factors affecting hydrolysis of polyphosphates in soils[J].Soil Science,1987,143(2):97-104.doi:10.1097/00010694-198702000-00003.
    [7]STROCHLEIM J I,SABET S A,CLEMENTS D M.Response of plants to polyphosphate on calcareous soils[J].Agronomy Journal,1968,60(5):576-577.doi:10.2134/agronj1968.00021962006000050040x.
    [8]RHUE R D,HENSEL D R,YUAN T L,ROBERTSON W K.Ammonium orthophosphate and ammonium polyphosphate as sources of phosphorus for potatoes[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1981,45:1229-1233.doi:10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500060044x.
    [9]鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,1999:296-336.LU R K.Analytical methods of soil agrochemistry[M].Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press,1999:296-336.
    [10]廖红,严小龙.高级植物营养学[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:140-155.LIAO H,YAN X L.Advanced Plant Nutrition[M].Beijing:Science Press,2003:140-155.
    [11]El-Sayed S A M.Ammonium Polyphosphate and Ammonium Orthophosphate as Sources of Phosphorus for Jerusalem artichoke[J].Alexandria Science Exchange Journal,2015,1(36):47-57.doi:10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2015.2738.
    [12]TOURE A,THOMSON K P B,EDWARDS G.Adaptation of the MIMICS backscattering model to the agricultural context-wheat and canola at L and C bands[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,1994,32(1):47-61.doi:10.1109/36.285188.
    [13]BORGES R,MALLARINO A P.Deep banding phosphorus and potassium fertilizers for corn managed with ridge tillage[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2001,65(2):376-384.doi:10.2136/sssaj2001.652376x.
    [14]KAISER D E,RUBIN J C.Maximum rates of seed placed fertilizer for corn for three soils[J].Agronomy Journal,2013,105(4):1211-1221.doi:10.2134/agronj2013.0125.
    [15]SUBBARAO Y V,ELLIS R,PAULSEN G M,PAUKSTELIS J V.Kinetics of pyro-and tri polyphosphate hydrolysis in the presence of corn and soybean roots as determined by NMR spectroscopy[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal.1977,41(2):316-318.doi:10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100020028x.
    [16]GILLIAM J W.Hydrolysis and uptake of pyrophosphate by plant roots[J].Soil Science Society of America Proceedings.1970,34(1):83-86.doi:10.2136/sssaj1970.03615995003400010025x.
    [17]STEIN J D,WESTERMAN R L.Subsurface and broadcast phosphorus effects on yield and composition of established alfalfa//Forage systems leading U.S.agriculture into the future:proceedings of the 1984 Forage and grassland conference[C].1984:88-92.
    [18]OTTMAN M J,THOMPSON T L,DOERGE T A.Alfalfa yield and soil phosphorus increased with top dressed granular compared with fluid phosphorus fertilizer[J].Agronomy Journal,2006,98(4):899-906.doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0257.
    [19]VENUGOPALAN M V,PRASAD R.Relative efficiency of ammonium polyphosphates and conventional orthophosphates for wheat(Triticum aestivum)and wheat-fodder cowpea(Vigna unguiculata)cropping sequence[J].Indian Journal of Agronomy,1992,37:226-230.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700