优质护理干预对慢性肾功能衰竭患者治疗的影响
|
摘要
目的探讨优质护理干预对慢性肾衰竭患者治疗的影响效果。方法整群选取该院2015年1月—2016年6月收治的168例慢性肾功能衰竭患者,将其随机分为优质组和常规组,优质组采用优质护理干预进行护理,常规组采用常规护理措施进行护理,对比两组患者的护理效果以及对治疗的影响。结果优质组护理依从度95.24%,常规组护理依从度为83.33%,优质组护理后SAS量表评分为(37.62±2.08)分,SDS量表评分(32.61±2.16)分,常规组护理后SAS量表评分为(65.03±8.46)分,SDS量表评分(53.25±8.27)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论慢性肾功能衰竭患者通过优质护理干预,有效提高了治疗依从度,改善了治疗效果,值得临床推广。
Objective To explore the effect of high quality nursing intervention on the treatment of chronic renal failure patients. Methods Group selection from January 2015 to June 2016, 168 cases of chronic renal failure patients, which were randomly divided into high quality group and normal group, high-quality group of high quality nursing intervention in nursing, the conventional group received routine nursing care, the nursing effect of the two groups were compared and the influence of treatment. Results The high quality nursing group compliance 95.24%, routine nursing group compliance was83.33%, high quality SAS group after nursing score(37.62 ±2.08)points, SDS score(32.61 ±2.16)points, conventional group SAS score(65.03 ±8.46)points, SDS score(53.25 ±8.27)points, significant difference was statistically significant(P <0.05). Conclusion The patients with chronic renal failure through high quality nursing intervention, effectively improve the treatment compliance, improve the treatment effect, it is worthy of clinical promotion.
Objective To explore the effect of high quality nursing intervention on the treatment of chronic renal failure patients. Methods Group selection from January 2015 to June 2016, 168 cases of chronic renal failure patients, which were randomly divided into high quality group and normal group, high-quality group of high quality nursing intervention in nursing, the conventional group received routine nursing care, the nursing effect of the two groups were compared and the influence of treatment. Results The high quality nursing group compliance 95.24%, routine nursing group compliance was83.33%, high quality SAS group after nursing score(37.62 ±2.08)points, SDS score(32.61 ±2.16)points, conventional group SAS score(65.03 ±8.46)points, SDS score(53.25 ±8.27)points, significant difference was statistically significant(P <0.05). Conclusion The patients with chronic renal failure through high quality nursing intervention, effectively improve the treatment compliance, improve the treatment effect, it is worthy of clinical promotion.
引文
[1]潘利琴.护理干预对慢性肾功能衰竭患者焦虑抑郁情绪的影响[J].护士进修杂志,2013,28(3):231-232.
[2]王少梅,杨晓彤.护理干预对慢性肾功能衰竭患者焦虑抑郁情绪的影响[J].中国继续医学教育,2014,28(4):231-232.
[3]王爱君,王晓军.焦点式心理护理干预对慢性肾功能衰竭患者负面情绪及日常生活能力的影响[J].内科,2016,11(2):305-307.
[4]顾晓晶.护理干预对慢性肾功能衰竭行血液透析患者的影响[J].吉林医学,2015,36(7):1473-1474.
[5]张俊.护理干预对慢性肾功能衰竭血液透析患者心理及遵医行为的影响[J].临床合理用药杂志,2015(19):108.
[6]赵瑾.护理干预对慢性肾功能衰竭患者焦虑抑郁情绪的影响[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2015,25(18):160-162.
[7]王伟.优质护理对早期慢性肾功能衰竭患者治疗的影响[J].中国实用医药,2015,10(22):248-250.
[8]张倩.优质护理对早期慢性肾功能衰竭患者治疗的影响分析[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2016,16(34):244-245.
[9]韩海燕,路建饶,王新华.肾衰方改善早中期慢性肾衰竭患者肾功能及纤维化的临床观察[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2016(15):166-170.
[10]王秀杰.护理干预对慢性肾病患者饮食治疗依从性的影响[J].赤峰学院学报:自然科学版,2014(19):55-56.
[11]朱杰娟.护理干预对慢性心功能衰竭患者的护理效果分析[J].赤峰学院学报:自然科学版,2014(17):14-15.
[12]李云霞,张春云,张小娟.护理干预对慢性心力衰竭患者用药的影响[J].河北医科大学学报,2013,34(2):136.
[2]王少梅,杨晓彤.护理干预对慢性肾功能衰竭患者焦虑抑郁情绪的影响[J].中国继续医学教育,2014,28(4):231-232.
[3]王爱君,王晓军.焦点式心理护理干预对慢性肾功能衰竭患者负面情绪及日常生活能力的影响[J].内科,2016,11(2):305-307.
[4]顾晓晶.护理干预对慢性肾功能衰竭行血液透析患者的影响[J].吉林医学,2015,36(7):1473-1474.
[5]张俊.护理干预对慢性肾功能衰竭血液透析患者心理及遵医行为的影响[J].临床合理用药杂志,2015(19):108.
[6]赵瑾.护理干预对慢性肾功能衰竭患者焦虑抑郁情绪的影响[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2015,25(18):160-162.
[7]王伟.优质护理对早期慢性肾功能衰竭患者治疗的影响[J].中国实用医药,2015,10(22):248-250.
[8]张倩.优质护理对早期慢性肾功能衰竭患者治疗的影响分析[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2016,16(34):244-245.
[9]韩海燕,路建饶,王新华.肾衰方改善早中期慢性肾衰竭患者肾功能及纤维化的临床观察[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2016(15):166-170.
[10]王秀杰.护理干预对慢性肾病患者饮食治疗依从性的影响[J].赤峰学院学报:自然科学版,2014(19):55-56.
[11]朱杰娟.护理干预对慢性心功能衰竭患者的护理效果分析[J].赤峰学院学报:自然科学版,2014(17):14-15.
[12]李云霞,张春云,张小娟.护理干预对慢性心力衰竭患者用药的影响[J].河北医科大学学报,2013,34(2):136.