祛魅与建构——传统非法证据排除规则理论在网络环境中的反思
|
摘要
随着网络和计算机技术的迅猛发展,证据较之以往趋现出了更多新形态。传统非法证据排除规则的理论基础主要包括虚伪排除理论、抑制违法理论、保障人权理论和程序正义理论四种。通过对它们进行祛魅,针对网络空间特性提出了一种新的理论——网络空间自由权保护理论,认为虚拟网络环境中进行非法证据排除系出自国家对网络空间自由权的保护,维持网络交往自由。
Along with the rapid development of network and computer technology,more forms of evidence emerge than before. Traditional exclusionary rule of unlawfully obtained evidence includes four fundamental theories of falseness exclusion,unlawful action control,human rights protection and procedure justice. But in the context information society the four theories seem a bit powerless. The paper tries to disenchant these theories and proposes the new theory--cyberspace liberty protection in view of the network space. It also regards exclusionary rule of unlawfully obtained evidence in the virtual environment as state protection for cyberspace liberty and guarantee for network communication freedom.
Along with the rapid development of network and computer technology,more forms of evidence emerge than before. Traditional exclusionary rule of unlawfully obtained evidence includes four fundamental theories of falseness exclusion,unlawful action control,human rights protection and procedure justice. But in the context information society the four theories seem a bit powerless. The paper tries to disenchant these theories and proposes the new theory--cyberspace liberty protection in view of the network space. It also regards exclusionary rule of unlawfully obtained evidence in the virtual environment as state protection for cyberspace liberty and guarantee for network communication freedom.
引文
[1]陈光中.刑事诉讼法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,高等教育出版社,2013.
[2]杜学毅.中国非法证据排除规则构建研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2013.
[3]湖南省教育厅.高等教育心理学[M].长沙:湖南大学出版社,2005.
[4]欧阳爱辉.论非法私人刑事调查证据排除规则[J].江西警察学院学报,2012(4).
[5][英]A.J.M.米尔恩.人的权利与人的多样性——人权哲学[M].夏勇,张志铭译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1995.
[6]樊崇义.诉讼原理[M].北京:法律出版社,2003.
[7]李娜.“棱镜门”暴露出大数据时代隐私危机[J].科技导报,2013,31(9).
[8]胡肖华,徐靖.论公民基本权利限制的正当性与限制性原则[J].法学评论,2005(6).
[9]庄威.散漫的严格——一种私人现象学的形成[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2014.
[10]尹衍波.电子商务法规[M].北京:清华大学出版社,北京交通大学出版社,2007.
[11]李明.监听制度研究——在犯罪控制与人权保障之间[M].北京:法律出版社,2008.
[12][美]罗斯科·庞德.普通法的精神[M].唐前宏,廖湘文等译.北京:法律出版社,2001.
[2]杜学毅.中国非法证据排除规则构建研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2013.
[3]湖南省教育厅.高等教育心理学[M].长沙:湖南大学出版社,2005.
[4]欧阳爱辉.论非法私人刑事调查证据排除规则[J].江西警察学院学报,2012(4).
[5][英]A.J.M.米尔恩.人的权利与人的多样性——人权哲学[M].夏勇,张志铭译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1995.
[6]樊崇义.诉讼原理[M].北京:法律出版社,2003.
[7]李娜.“棱镜门”暴露出大数据时代隐私危机[J].科技导报,2013,31(9).
[8]胡肖华,徐靖.论公民基本权利限制的正当性与限制性原则[J].法学评论,2005(6).
[9]庄威.散漫的严格——一种私人现象学的形成[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2014.
[10]尹衍波.电子商务法规[M].北京:清华大学出版社,北京交通大学出版社,2007.
[11]李明.监听制度研究——在犯罪控制与人权保障之间[M].北京:法律出版社,2008.
[12][美]罗斯科·庞德.普通法的精神[M].唐前宏,廖湘文等译.北京:法律出版社,2001.