先期近端优化技术改善分叉病变双支架术的预后
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Preproximal optimization technique improves outcome of bifurcate lesions after implantation of two stents
  • 作者:汪国忠 ; 赵全明 ; 陈清 ; 张晓霞 ; 田磊
  • 英文作者:Wang Guozhong;Zhao Quanming;Chen Qing;Zhang Xiaoxia;Tian Lei;Department of Cardiology,Affiliated Beijing Anzhen Hospital of Capital Medicine University,Beijing Institute of Heart,Lung and Vascular Diseases;
  • 关键词:支架 ; 冠心病 ; 扩张术 ; 阿司匹林 ; 造影剂
  • 英文关键词:stents;;coronary disease;;dilatation;;aspirin;;contrast media
  • 中文刊名:LNXG
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart Brain and Vessel Diseases
  • 机构:首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院心内科北京市心肺血管病研究所;
  • 出版日期:2019-07-15
  • 出版单位:中华老年心脑血管病杂志
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.21
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:LNXG201907010
  • 页数:4
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:11-4468/R
  • 分类号:41-44
摘要
目的探讨先期近端优化技术(POT)能否常规应用于各种分叉病变双支架术。方法选择我院近3年接受双支架治疗的分叉病变患者386例,根据是否采用先期POT,分为先期POT组178例[先期POT结合常规对吻球囊扩张(KBI)]和KBI组208例。观察2组1年不良心血管事件、KBI成功率及效率。结果在随访期内,先期POT组不良心血管事件发生率(11.2%vs 19.7%,P=0.03)和再次靶血管重建率低于KBI组(7.3%vs 13.9%,P=0.04),KBI成功率明显高于KBI组(98.3%vs 88.5%,P=0.00)。结论先期POT结合KBI,能提高KBI成功率及操作效率,使双支架术治疗分叉病变获得更佳临床预后。
        Objective To study the application of preproximal optimization technique(pre-POT)in treatment of bifurcate lesions after implantation of two stents.Methods Three hundred and eighty-six bifurcation lesions patients who underwent implantation of two stents in our hospital were divided into pre-POT group(n=178)and kiss balloon inflation(KBI)group(n=208).The 1-year incidence of MACE,the success rate and efficiency of KBI were retrospectively analyzed.Results The incidence of MACE was significantly lower in pre-POT group than in KBI group during the follow-up period(11.2%vs 19.7%,P=0.03).The revascularization rate of target lesions was significantly lower while the success rate was significantly higher in pre-POT group than in KBI group(7.3%vs 13.9%,P=0.04;98.3%vs 88.5%,P=0.00).Conclusion pre-POT combined with KBI seems to improve the success rate and efficiency of KBI and achieve the better outcome of bifurcate lesions after implantation of two stents.
引文
[1]Colombo A,Jabbour RJ.Bifurcation lesions:no need to implant two stents when one is sufficient[J]!Eur Heart J,2016,37(24):1929-1931.DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/eh w185.
    [2]Lassen JF,Burzotta F,Banning AP,et al.Percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main stem and other bifurcation lesions:12th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club[J].EuroIntervention,2018,13(13):1540-1553.DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00622.
    [3]Sgueglia GA,Chevalier B.Kissing balloon inflation in percutaneous coronary interventions[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2012,5(8):803-811.DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.005.
    [4]Finet G,Derimay F,Motreff P,et al.Comparative analysis of sequential proximal optimizing technique versus kissing balloon inflation technique in provisional bifurcation stenting:fractal coronary bifurcation bench test[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2015,8(10):1308-1317.DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2015.05.016.
    [5]Gwon HC,Hahn JY,Koo BK,et al.Final kissing ballooning and long-term clinical outcomes in coronary bifurcation lesions treated with 1-stent technique:results from the COBISRegistry[J].Heart,2012,98(3):225-231.DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300322.
    [6]Murasato Y,Iwasaki K,Yamamoto T,et al.Optimal kissing balloon inflation after single-stent deployment in a coronary bifurcation model[J].EuroIntervention,2014,10(8):934-941.DOI:10.4244/EIJV10I8A160.
    [7]Mortier P,Hikichi Y,FoinN,et al.Provisional stenting of coronary bifurcations:insights into final kissing balloon post-dilation and stent design by computational modeling[J].JACCCardiovasc Interv,2014,7(3):325-333.DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.012.
    [8]Foin N,Secco GG,Ghilencea L,et al.Final proximal postdilatation is necessary after kissing balloon in bifurcation stenting[J].EuroIntervention,2011,7(5):597-604.DOI:10.4244/EIJV7I5A96.
    [9]Foin N,Torii R,Mortier P,et al.Kissing balloon or sequential dilation of the side branch and main vessel for provisional stenting of bifurcations:lessons from micro-computed tomography and computational simulations[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2012,5(1):47-56.DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.019.
    [10]Dérimay F,Finet G,Souteyrand G,et al.Benefit of a new provisional stenting strategy,the re-proximal optimisation technique:the rePOT clinical study[J].EuroIntervention,2018,14(3):e325-e332.DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00941.
    [11]Grundeken MJ,Collet C,Ishibashi Y,et al.Visual estimation versus different quantitative coronary angiography methods to assess lesion severity in bifurcation lesions[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2018,91(7):1263-1270.DOI:10.1002/ccd.27243.
    [12]Hildick-Smith D,de Belder AJ,Cooter N,et al.Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions:the British Bifurcation Coronary Study:old,new,and evolving strategies[J].Circulation,2010,121(10):1235-1243.DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.888297.
    [13]Würtz M,Christiansen EH,Kristensen SD,et al.Accidentally crushed stent during complex bifurcation treatment.A potential cause of very late stent thrombosis[J].Int J Cardiol,2015,197:113-115.DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.045.
    [14]Rigatelli G,Zuin M,Dell'Awocata F,et al.Evaluation of coronary flow conditions in complex coronary artery bifurcations stenting using computational fluid dynamics:impact of final proximal optimization technique on different double-stent techniques[J].Cardiovasc Revasc Med,2017,18(4):233-240.DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2017.01.002.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700