贪污贿赂犯罪刑事缺席审判制度探讨
|
摘要
我国刑事缺席审判制度是追究被告人刑事责任的一种全新的审判程序制度,适应了反腐败和国际追逃追赃的新需要,体现了刑事诉讼制度的新成就。然而,传统刑事诉讼理论和实践均缺乏对其必要的认知和探讨。贪污贿赂犯罪刑事缺席审判制度以起诉法定主义、有诉必审原则、人权保障和诉讼效益为基础理论,以被告人自愿放弃庭审在场权为正当源泉。完善我国贪污贿赂犯罪刑事缺席审判制度,应当严格限制适用范围、明确适用条件、规范适用程序和明晰与违法所得没收程序的衔接,同时,要审视其本身固有缺陷并充分评估而进行调整,行之有效地发挥制度功能。
Chinese criminal default trial system is a brand-new trial procedure system that investigates the criminal responsibility of the defendant. It adapts to the new needs of anti-corruption and international pursuit and recovery,and reflects the new achievements of the criminal litigation system. However,traditional criminal litigation theory and practice lack the necessary cognition and discussion. The criminal default trial system for corruption and bribery is based on the theory of prosecuting statutoryism,the principle of litigation,human rights protection and litigation benefit. That the defendant voluntarily renounces the right to appear in court is a legitimate source. To perfect the criminal default trial system for corruption and bribery in China,one should strictly limit the scope of application,clarify the applicable conditions,standardize the applicable procedures,and clarify the connection with the confiscation procedures of illegal income. At the same time,it is necessary to examine its own inherent defects and make full adjustments,and play the role of the system effectively.
Chinese criminal default trial system is a brand-new trial procedure system that investigates the criminal responsibility of the defendant. It adapts to the new needs of anti-corruption and international pursuit and recovery,and reflects the new achievements of the criminal litigation system. However,traditional criminal litigation theory and practice lack the necessary cognition and discussion. The criminal default trial system for corruption and bribery is based on the theory of prosecuting statutoryism,the principle of litigation,human rights protection and litigation benefit. That the defendant voluntarily renounces the right to appear in court is a legitimate source. To perfect the criminal default trial system for corruption and bribery in China,one should strictly limit the scope of application,clarify the applicable conditions,standardize the applicable procedures,and clarify the connection with the confiscation procedures of illegal income. At the same time,it is necessary to examine its own inherent defects and make full adjustments,and play the role of the system effectively.
引文
[1]万毅.刑事缺席审判制度立法技术三题:以《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法(修正案)》为中心[J].中国刑事法杂志,2018(3):32.
[2]陈光中. 21世纪域外刑事诉讼立法最新发展[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
[3]邓思清.刑事缺席审判制度研究[J].法学研究,2007(3):95.
[4]陈卫东.论中国特色刑事缺席审判制度[J].中国刑事法杂志,2018(3):17-22.
[5]欧卫安.略谈刑事缺席审判制度的类型:以西方国家刑事审判为例[J].河南师范大学学报,2005(5):133.
[6]崔凯.义务视阈下的被告人庭审在场问题研究[J].政法论坛,2017(3):153.
[7]薛智仁.反思刑事被告之审判期日在场义务[J].台北大学法学评论,2013(1):261.
[8]田圣斌,麻爱民.我国公诉案件缺席审判制度探析[J].法学评论,2008(4):130.
[9]王晨光.关于司法公正与效率的思考[N].检察日报,2003-12-01.
[10]陈光中,胡铭.《联合国反腐败公约》与刑事诉讼再修改[J].政法论坛,2006(1):90.
[11]王敏远.刑事缺席审判制度探讨[J].法学杂志,2018(8):48.
[12]肖沛权.价值平衡下刑事缺席审判制度的适用[J].法学杂志,2018(8):55.
[13]张磊.境外追逃中的量刑承诺制度研究[J].中国法学,2017(1):74.
[14]汪海燕,王宏平.司法改革背景下检委会的职能定位[J].国家检察官学院学报,2018(1):71.
(1)Lutz Meyer-Goβner,Strafprozessordnung,53.Aufl.,2010,§230 Rn.3。
(2)《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于适用犯罪嫌疑人、被告人逃匿、死亡案件违法所得没收程序若干问题的规定》第十条的规定。
[2]陈光中. 21世纪域外刑事诉讼立法最新发展[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
[3]邓思清.刑事缺席审判制度研究[J].法学研究,2007(3):95.
[4]陈卫东.论中国特色刑事缺席审判制度[J].中国刑事法杂志,2018(3):17-22.
[5]欧卫安.略谈刑事缺席审判制度的类型:以西方国家刑事审判为例[J].河南师范大学学报,2005(5):133.
[6]崔凯.义务视阈下的被告人庭审在场问题研究[J].政法论坛,2017(3):153.
[7]薛智仁.反思刑事被告之审判期日在场义务[J].台北大学法学评论,2013(1):261.
[8]田圣斌,麻爱民.我国公诉案件缺席审判制度探析[J].法学评论,2008(4):130.
[9]王晨光.关于司法公正与效率的思考[N].检察日报,2003-12-01.
[10]陈光中,胡铭.《联合国反腐败公约》与刑事诉讼再修改[J].政法论坛,2006(1):90.
[11]王敏远.刑事缺席审判制度探讨[J].法学杂志,2018(8):48.
[12]肖沛权.价值平衡下刑事缺席审判制度的适用[J].法学杂志,2018(8):55.
[13]张磊.境外追逃中的量刑承诺制度研究[J].中国法学,2017(1):74.
[14]汪海燕,王宏平.司法改革背景下检委会的职能定位[J].国家检察官学院学报,2018(1):71.
(1)Lutz Meyer-Goβner,Strafprozessordnung,53.Aufl.,2010,§230 Rn.3。
(2)《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于适用犯罪嫌疑人、被告人逃匿、死亡案件违法所得没收程序若干问题的规定》第十条的规定。