论《三国演义》中袁绍的人物形象
|
摘要
在《三国演义》中,年少时的袁绍是一位有名气、血气方刚的少年才俊;而中年的袁绍却成了一位外强中干的纸老虎和心无主见、胸无大志的庸主。此外,他也是一个不合格的父亲,没能处理好诸子关系,致其二子相残,基业速亡。小说中的袁绍形象基本上符合历史原型,作者罗贯中充分利用《三国志》、《后汉书》等史书中的基本素材,塑造了这一悲剧人物。袁绍人物形象的塑造对整部小说主要人物的形象塑造起到了陪衬作用,并推动了故事情节的发展,也给后世留下了无言的启示。
In The Romance of the Three Kingdoms,the young Yuan Shao was a famous and passionate talent.But the middle-aged Yuan Shao became a forcible-feeble paper tiger and a shiftless straw bag;In addition,he was an unqualified father due to his failed education resulting in internal strife between his two sons and the perish along with this struggle.The image of Yuan Shao in the novel conformed to the historical prototype basically,and the author Luo Guanzhong made full use of the basic materials in history books such as The Three Kingdoms Chronicles and The Book of the later Han dynasty,and shaped the tragic figure.The shaping of Yuan Shao's characters played a role in the main characters of the novel,which promoted the development of the plot and left a silent revelation for the later generations.
In The Romance of the Three Kingdoms,the young Yuan Shao was a famous and passionate talent.But the middle-aged Yuan Shao became a forcible-feeble paper tiger and a shiftless straw bag;In addition,he was an unqualified father due to his failed education resulting in internal strife between his two sons and the perish along with this struggle.The image of Yuan Shao in the novel conformed to the historical prototype basically,and the author Luo Guanzhong made full use of the basic materials in history books such as The Three Kingdoms Chronicles and The Book of the later Han dynasty,and shaped the tragic figure.The shaping of Yuan Shao's characters played a role in the main characters of the novel,which promoted the development of the plot and left a silent revelation for the later generations.
引文
[1]罗贯中.三国演义[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2005:269,18,18,29,29,29,30,40,187,254,251,261,262,251,216,219,181,357,192-193,262,271,271,157,207,242,20.
[2]郝经.续后汉书(第2册)[M].北京:中华书局,1985:99.
[3]范晔.后汉书[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2008:861,859.
[4]陈寿.三国志[M].北京:中华书局.2006:357,132,132.
[5]毛宗岗.毛宗岗批评本三国演义[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2006:304,423,89,444,56.
[6]王永平.论袁绍[J].扬州师院学报:社会科学版,1995(1):61.
[7]鲁迅.鲁迅文集(第2卷)[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,2009:73.
[8]蔡东藩.后汉演义[M].郑州:中州古籍出版社,2009:327.
[9]王奎莉.社会主义核心价值观的培育践行途径研究[J].石家庄铁道大学学报:社会科学版,2015(4):84.
[10]王建平,任丽红.论《三国演义》中的血亲兄弟关系及其启示[J].湖北工程学院学报,2013(5):38.
[2]郝经.续后汉书(第2册)[M].北京:中华书局,1985:99.
[3]范晔.后汉书[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2008:861,859.
[4]陈寿.三国志[M].北京:中华书局.2006:357,132,132.
[5]毛宗岗.毛宗岗批评本三国演义[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2006:304,423,89,444,56.
[6]王永平.论袁绍[J].扬州师院学报:社会科学版,1995(1):61.
[7]鲁迅.鲁迅文集(第2卷)[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,2009:73.
[8]蔡东藩.后汉演义[M].郑州:中州古籍出版社,2009:327.
[9]王奎莉.社会主义核心价值观的培育践行途径研究[J].石家庄铁道大学学报:社会科学版,2015(4):84.
[10]王建平,任丽红.论《三国演义》中的血亲兄弟关系及其启示[J].湖北工程学院学报,2013(5):38.