渝东南地区下古生界页岩含气性差异关键控制因素
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Key control factor for the gas-bearing properties difference of lower Paleozoic shale in southeast Chongqing
  • 作者:焦伟伟 ; 方光建 ; 汪生秀 ; 张志平 ; 余川
  • 英文作者:JIAO Weiwei;FANG Guangjian;WANG Shengxiu;ZHANG Zhiping;YU Chuan;National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Shale Gas Exploration and Development,Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources;Key Laboratory of Shale Gas Exploration,Ministry of Land and Resources,Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources;Chongqing Shale Gas Research Center of State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting;
  • 关键词:渝东南 ; 富有机质页岩 ; 含气性 ; 有机质孔 ; 封闭性 ; 氮气
  • 英文关键词:southeast Chongqing;;organic-rich shale;;gas-bearing properties;;pore structure;;sealing ability
  • 中文刊名:MTXB
  • 英文刊名:Journal of China Coal Society
  • 机构:页岩气勘探开发国家地方联合工程研究中心(重庆地质矿产研究院);国土资源部页岩气资源勘查重点实验室(重庆地质矿产研究院);油气资源与探测国家重点实验室重庆页岩气研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-15
  • 出版单位:煤炭学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.44;No.297
  • 基金:重庆市重点产业共性关键技术创新专项基金资助项目(cstc2016zdcy-zd90001);; 重庆市科研院所绩效激励引导专项基金资助项目(cstc2017jxjl90009);; 国家科技重大专项资助项目(2016ZX05034003-001)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:MTXB201906018
  • 页数:9
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:11-2190/TD
  • 分类号:166-174
摘要
渝东南地区紧邻涪陵页岩气田,区内的下寒武统牛蹄塘组和上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组是目前页岩气勘探开发的2套重点层位,相比于涪陵焦石坝地区,改造强度更强,演化程度更高,勘探效果也差别较大,已有研究证明构造运动是盆内与盆外页岩气差异富集的关键控制作用。而对于同样经历了强改造和高演化的渝东南地区下古生界的2套页岩层位来说,2者均具有优质的物质基础,但含气性却差异十分显著。从现场含气量解吸和室内等温吸附实验出发,通过动静态指标对比和相关性研究,分析含气性的关键控制因素。结果表明:下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩吸附能力较强,但现场解吸气却表现为"高氮、低烃、微含气"的特征;上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组页岩吸附能力略逊于下寒武统牛蹄塘组,但含气性却明显好于牛蹄塘组,多口井的解吸气量达到工业下限,气体成分以烃类气体为主。有机质的孔隙结构和富有机质页岩层系底板的封闭性是导致这2套层位含气性差异显著的关键因素。下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩有机质孔欠发育,致使储集物性较差,而其底板发育不整合面并伴随流体活动,导致气藏遭到破坏,是其含气性差的关键。上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组页岩中呈蜂窝状密集发育的有机质孔大大增加了页岩气赋存的空间,加之顶底板的封闭性较好,为页岩气富集提供了良好的条件。通过单井解剖总结建立了渝东南地区下古生界两种典型的页岩气保存散失模型:敛聚保存型聚集模式和底板冲刷破坏散失模式。针对2套目的层的含气性关键控制因素的差异,建议对于下寒武统牛蹄塘组应进一步加强选区指标的研究;上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组应进一步加强选带方法的研究。
        Southeast Chongqing is close to Fuling shale gasfield.Niutitang Formation and Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation are its two major explorative formations.Compared with Jiaoshiba area,the two formations experienced stronger reformation and had higher thermal maturity,and their explorative results differed obviously,which was caused by tectonic movement.The two formations in Southeast Chongqing have same material resource,but the gas-bearing properties has significant difference. Based on field desorption and isothermal adsorption experiment,according to the comparative study of static and dynamic indexes,the key control factors were discovered.Adsorption capacity of Niutitang Formation was stronger,but its gas-bearing properties was poor that shown the characteristics of low hydrocarbon content and high nitrogen content.Adsorption capacity of Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi Formation was weaker,but its gas-bearing properties was better than Niutitang Formation.There were several wells whose desorbed gas content reached industrial limit,and its gas composition was mainly hydrocarbon.It was proved that the organic pore structure and floor sealing ability of organic-rich shale were the main control factors for the gas-bearing properties difference of the two shale formations from the Lower Paleozoic in Southeast Chongqing. Organic pores of Niutitang Formation are underdeveloped,resulting in poor reservoir properties,and the unconformity of the bottom is accompanied by fluid activities,resulting in the destruction of gas reservoirs,which is the key to poor gas-bearing properties.Organic pores like honeycomb of Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi Formation have greatly increased the space of shale gas accumulation,and the sealing of the above and under formation is better,which provides better accumulation conditions for shale gas.Then two typical models of shale gas accumulation for the Lower Paleozoic in the southeastern Chongqing were established including accumulation-preservation model and washing-destruction model. In view of the differences in the key gas-controlling factors of the two formations,it is suggested that the optimal indicators of favorable area should be further researched for Niutitang Formation,and the selection belt method for Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi Formation should be further researched.
引文
[1]郭彤楼,刘若冰.复杂构造区高演化程度海相页岩气勘探突破的启示———以四川盆地东部盆缘JY1井为例[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(4):643-651.GUO Tonglou,LIU Ruobing. Implications from marine shale gas exploration breakthrough in complicated structural area at high thermal stage:Taking Longmaxi Formation in well JY1 as an example[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(4):643-651.
    [2]郭旭升,胡东风,文治东,等.四川盆地及周缘下古生界海相页岩气富集高产主控因素———以焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J].中国地质,2014,41(3):893-901.GUO Xusheng,HU Dongfeng,WEN Zhidong,et al.Major factors controlling the accumulation and high productivity in marine shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic of Sichuan Basin and its periphery:A case study of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation of Jiaoshiba area[J]. Geology in China,2014,41(3):893-901.
    [3]罗健,戴鸿鸣,邵隆坎,等.四川盆地下古生界页岩气资源前景预测[J].岩性油气藏,2012,24(4):70-74,9.LUO Jian,DAI Hongming,SHAO Longkan,et al.Prospect prediction for shale gas resources of the Lower Paleozoic in Sichuan Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2012,24(4):70-74,9.
    [4]张小龙,张同伟,李艳芳,等.页岩气勘探和开发进展综述[J].岩性油气藏,2013,25(2):116-122.ZHANG Xiaolong,ZHANG Tongwei,LI Yanfang,et al. Research advance in exploration and development of shale gas[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(2):116-122.
    [5]胡明毅,邓庆杰,胡忠贵.上扬子地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩气成藏条件[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(2):272-279.HU Mingyi,DENG Qingjie,HU Zhonggui. Shale gas accumulation conditions of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in Upper Yangtze region[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2014,35(2):272-279.
    [6]张金川,聂海宽,徐波,等.四川盆地页岩气成藏地质条件[J].天然气工业,2008,28(2):151-156,180.ZHANG Jinchuan NIE Haikuan,XU Bo,et al.Geological condition of shale gas accumulation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(2):151-156,180.
    [7]郭旭升.南方海相页岩气“二元富集”规律———四川盆地及周缘龙马溪组页岩气勘探实践认识[J].地质学报,2014,88(7):1209-1218.GUO Xusheng. Rules of two-factor enrichment for marine shale gas in Southern China—Understanding from the Longmaxi formation shale gas in Sichuan Basin and its surrounding area[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2014,88(7):1209-1218.
    [8]韩双彪,张金川,邢雅文,等.渝东南下志留统龙马溪组页岩气聚集条件与资源潜力[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(S1):168-173.HAN Shuangbiao,ZHANG Jinchuan,XING Yawen,et al. Shale gas accumulation conditions and resource potential of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in southeast Chongqing[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(S1):168-173.
    [9]李可,王兴志,张馨艺,等.四川盆地东部下志留统龙马溪组页岩储层特征及影响因素[J].岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):52-58.LI Ke,WANG Xingzhi,ZHANG Xinyi,et al. Shale gas accumulation conditions of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in Upper Yangtze region[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):52-58.
    [10]李辛子,王运海,姜昭琛,等.深部煤层气勘探开发进展与研究[J].煤炭学报,2016,41(1):24-31.LI Xinzi,WANG Yunhai,JIANG Zhaochen,et al. Progress and study on exploration and production for deep coalbed methane[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(1):24-31.
    [11]程俊,徐晓飞,张文峰,等.上扬子西北缘宁强湾牛蹄塘组有机地球化学特征[J].岩性油气藏,2017,29(1):21-26.CHENG Jun,XU Xiaofei,ZHANG Wenfeng,et al. Organic geochemical characteristics of Niutitang Formation in Ningqiang Bay,the northwestern margin of Upper Yangtze platform[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(1):21-26.
    [12]程克明,王世谦,董大忠,等.上扬子区下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩气成藏条件[J].天然气工业,2009,29(5):40-44,137.CHENG Keming,WANG Shiqian,DONG Dazhong,et al.Accumulation conditions of shale gas reservoirs in the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation,the Upper Yangtze region[J].Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(5):40-44,137.
    [13]聂海宽,张金川,李玉喜.四川盆地及其周缘下寒武统页岩气聚集条件[J].石油学报,2011,32(6):959-967.NIE Haikuan,ZHANG Jinchuan,LI Yuxi. Accumulation conditions of the Lower Cambrian shale gas in the Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(6):959-967.
    [14]吴陈君,张明峰,马万云,等.渝东南牛蹄塘组页岩有机质特征及沉积环境研究[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(8):1267-1274.WU Chenjun,ZHANG Mingfeng,MA Wanyun,et al. Organic matter characteristic and sedimentary environment of the Lower Camnrian Niutitang shale in southeastern Chongqing[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(8):1267-1274.
    [15]黄俨然,杨荣丰,肖正辉,等.湘西北下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩含气性影响因素分析[J].岩性油气藏,2015,27(4):11-16.HUANG Yanran,YANG Rongfeng,XIAO Zhenghui,et al. Influencing factors of shale gas-bearing property of Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in northwestern Hunan[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(4):11-16.
    [16]周文,徐浩,余谦,等.四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组与筇竹寺组页岩含气性差异及成因[J].岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):18-25.ZHOU Wen,XU Hao,YU Qian,et al. Shale gas-bearing property differences and their genesis between Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation and Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and surrounding areas[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):18-25.
    [17]秦勇,申建,沈玉林.叠置含气系统共采兼容性———煤系“三气”及深部煤层气开采中的共性地质问题[J].煤炭学报,2016,41(1):14-23.QIN Yong,SHEN Jian,SHEN Yulin. Joint mining compatibility of superposed gas-bearing systems:A general geological problem for extraction of three natural gases and deep CBM in coal series[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(1):14-23.
    [18]于炳松.页岩气储层的特殊性及其评价思路和内容[J].地学前缘,2012,19(3):252-258.YU Bingsong.Particularity of shale gas reservoir and its evaluation[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(3):252-258.
    [19]龙鹏宇,张金川,唐玄,等.泥页岩裂缝发育特征及其对页岩气勘探和开发的影响[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(3):525-532.LONG Pengyu,ZHANG Jinchuan,TANG Xuan,et al. Feature of muddy shale fissure and its effect for shale gas exploration and development[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(3):525-532.
    [20]朱亮亮.页岩含气量实验方法与评价技术[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2013:26-37.ZHU Lliangliang.The research in labototial methodologies and analytical assessment to shale gas content[D].Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing),2013:26-37.
    [21]魏强,晏波,肖贤明.页岩气解吸方法研究进展[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(9):1657-1665.WEI Qiang,YAN Bo,XIAO Xianming.Research progress on the desorption methods of shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(9):1657-1665.
    [22]戴金星,宋岩,程坤芳,等.中国含油气盆地有机烷烃气碳同位素特征[J].石油学报,1993,14(2):23-31.DAI Jinxing,SONG Yan,CHENG Kunfang,et al. Characteristics of carbons topes of organic alkane gases in petroliferous basins of China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,1993,14(2):23-31.
    [23]陈安定.氮气对于海相地层油气保存的指示作用[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(1):85-89.CHEN Anding.Nitrogen as an index of oil-gas preservation conditions in marine strata[J].Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2005,27(1):85-89.
    [24]朱炎铭,陈尚斌,方俊华,等.四川地区志留系页岩气成藏的地质背景[J].煤炭学报,2010,35(7):1160-1164.ZHU Yanming,CHEN Shangbin,FANG Junhua,et al. The geologic background of the Siluric shale-gas reservoiring in Szechwan,China[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2010,35(7):1160-1164.
    [25]邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):641-653.ZOU Caineng,DONG Dazhong,WANG Shejiao,et al. Geological characteristics,formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(6):641-653.
    [26]王鹏万,李昌,张磊,等.五峰组—龙马溪组储层特征及甜点层段评价———以昭通页岩气示范区A井为例[J].煤炭学报,2017,42(11):2925-2935.WANG Pengwan,LI Chang,ZHANG Lei,et al.Characteristic of the shale gas reservoirs and evaluation of sweet spotin Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation:A case from the A well in Zhaotong shale gas demonsration zone[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2017,42(11):2925-2935.
    [27] LUO Qingyong,ZHONG Ningning,DAI Na,et al.Graptolite-derived organic matter in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formationg(Upper Ordovician-Lower Silurian)of southeastern Chongqing,China:Implications for gas shale evaluation[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology,2016,153:87-98.
    [28]朱炎铭,张寒,亢韦,等.中上扬子地区龙马溪组,筇竹寺组页岩有机质微孔缝特征:生物发育与孔隙网络[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(8):1507-1515.ZHU Yanming,ZHANG Han,KANG Wei,et al. Organic nanopores of Longmaxi and Qiongzhusi Formations in the Upper Yangtze:Biological precursor and pore network[J]. Nature Gas Geoscience,2015,26(8):1507-1515.
    [29]邓昆,周文,周立发,等.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系平凉组笔石页岩微孔隙特征及其影响因素[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(3):378-385.DENG Kun,ZHOU Wen,ZHOU Lifa,et al. Influencing factors of micropores in the graptolite shale of Ordovician Pingliang Formation in Ordos Basin,China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(3):378-385.
    [30] HOU Peng,JU Yang,GAO Feng,et al.Simulation and visualization of the displacement between CO2and formation fluids at pore-scale levels and its application to the recovery of shale gas[J]. International Journal of Coal Science&Technology,2016,3(4):351-369.
    [31]焦伟伟,汪生秀,程礼军,等.渝东南地区下寒武统页岩气高氮低烃成因[J].天然气地球科学,2017,28(12):1882-1890.JIAO Weiwei,WANG Shengxiu,CHENG Lijun,et al. The reason of high nitrogen content and low hydrocarbon content of shale gas from the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in southeast Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(12):1882-1890.
    [32]梁峰,朱炎铭,马超,等.湘西北地区牛蹄塘组页岩气储层沉积展布及储集特征[J].煤炭学报,2015,40(12):2884-2892.LIANG Feng,ZHU Yanming,MA Chao,et al.Sedimentary distribution and reservoir characteristics of shale gas reservoir of Niutitang Formation in Northwestern Hunan[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2015,40(12):2884-2892.
    [33]陈尚斌,朱炎铭,王红岩,等.川南龙马溪组页岩气储层纳米孔隙结构特征及其成藏意义[J].煤炭学报,2012,37(3):438-444.CHEN Shangbin,ZHU Yanming,WANG Hongyan,et al. Structure characteristics and accumulation significance of nanopores in Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in the southern Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2012,37(3):438-444.
    [34]王哲,李贤庆,周宝刚,等.川南地区下古生界页岩气储层微观孔隙结构表征及其对含气性的影响[J].煤炭学报,2016,41(9):2287-2297.WANG Zhe,LI Xianqing,ZHOU Baogang,et al. Characterization of microscopic pore structure and its influence on gas content of shale gas reservoirs from the Lower Paleozoic in southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(9):2287-2297.
    [35] MA Yong,ZHONG Ningning,CHENG Lijun,et al. Pore structure of the graptolite-derived OM in the Longmaxi shale,southeastern upper Yangtze region,China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2016,72,1-11.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700