2016—2017年广西食品安全风险会商工作调查
|
摘要
目的分析广西食品安全风险会商资料,了解发现风险的途径、风险内容和风险程度分布,为风险管理提供依据。方法应用文献查阅、现场实践和集体会商方法,收集广西食品安全风险会商工作资料进行分析。结果 2016年1月至2017年9月,广西食品安全委员会办公室(简称食安办)共组织5次定期食品安全风险会商联席会议,收到10个食安办成员单位递交的食品安全风险点167个。其中,严重风险占4.2%,较严重风险占17.4%,一般风险占78.4%。严重风险主要涉及食物中毒和非法添加物类,较严重风险主要涉及致病微生物和寄生虫、禁限用农药兽药残留类。风险发现途径主要为食品安全风险监测(21.6%)、食品监督抽检(29.3%)和投诉举报(21.0%)。风险内容主要涉及食品生产经营管理类(包括广告、场所监管等)占28.1%,非法添加物类占19.7%,致病微生物和寄生虫占12.6%。结论食品安全风险会商可促进信息共享和风险交流,为科学研判食品安全形势,提出区域性、普遍性的风险管理措施提供技术支持。
Objective To analysis Guangxi food safety risk consultation data, to understand the approaches of risk discovery and the distribution of risk content and risk level for food risk management. Methods Using the methods of literature review, field practice and collective consultation, the data of food safety risk consultations in Guangxi were collected and analyzed. Results From 2016 to September 2017, the Office of the Guangxi Food Safety Commission organized five regular food safety risk conferences and received 167 food risk points submitted by 10 member organizations of the Food Security Office, of which very serious risks accounted for 4.2 % and serious risks for17.4 %, the general risk for 78.4 %. The major approaches for risk detection were Food safety risk monitoring(21.6 %), food supervision and inspection(29.3 %)and complaint reporting(21.0 %). The common risk contents involved of food production and management(27.9 %), illegal additives(19.7 %), and microorganisms and parasites contaminations(12.6 %). The conferences were good opportunities to discuss regional and universal risk management measures. Conclusion The conferences of food safety risk consultations can enhance the information sharing and exchanging of experiences. And it is good approach for scientifically estimating food risk situations then providing technical bases for regional and general risk management.
Objective To analysis Guangxi food safety risk consultation data, to understand the approaches of risk discovery and the distribution of risk content and risk level for food risk management. Methods Using the methods of literature review, field practice and collective consultation, the data of food safety risk consultations in Guangxi were collected and analyzed. Results From 2016 to September 2017, the Office of the Guangxi Food Safety Commission organized five regular food safety risk conferences and received 167 food risk points submitted by 10 member organizations of the Food Security Office, of which very serious risks accounted for 4.2 % and serious risks for17.4 %, the general risk for 78.4 %. The major approaches for risk detection were Food safety risk monitoring(21.6 %), food supervision and inspection(29.3 %)and complaint reporting(21.0 %). The common risk contents involved of food production and management(27.9 %), illegal additives(19.7 %), and microorganisms and parasites contaminations(12.6 %). The conferences were good opportunities to discuss regional and universal risk management measures. Conclusion The conferences of food safety risk consultations can enhance the information sharing and exchanging of experiences. And it is good approach for scientifically estimating food risk situations then providing technical bases for regional and general risk management.
引文
[1]旭日干,庞国芳.中国食品安全现状、问题及对策战略研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2015:12.
[2]FAO/WHO.FAO food and nutrition paper 70:the application of risk communication to food standards and safety matters,report of a joint fao/who expert consultation[EB/OL].(1998-02-06)[2018-1-15].http://www.fao.org.docrep/005.x127le00.htm.
[3]FAO/WHO.FAO food and nutrition paper 87:food safety risk analysis,a guide for national food safety authorities[EB/OL].(2006-11-01)[2018-1-15].ftp://fao.org.docrep/fao/009/a0822e/a0822e.pdf.
[4]卫生部办公厅关于印发国家食品安全风险监测结果会商机制的函[Z].2012.6.
[5]广西壮族自治区食品安全委员会办公室关于印发广西壮族自治区食品安全风险会商联席会议制度的通知[Z].2015.11
[6]杜晓曦.落实监督抽检,加强风险交流预警[J].中国食品药品监管,2017(10):35.
[7]韦波.完善基层治理体系,推动“四有两责”落地生根[J].中国食品药品监管,2016(1):19.
[8]韦波.广西推进基层食品药品安全工作的实践与思考[J].当代广西,2015(19):52.
[9]陈绍民.建立风险防控体系,构筑牢固安全防线——食品药品安全风险会商制度的实践与思考[J].中国食品药品监管,2013(4):4-5.
[10]石萌萌,蒋玉艳,谢艺红,等.2016年广西食源性疾病暴发事件流行病学特征分析[J],应用预防医学,2017,23(6):465-468.
[11]刘银品,刘展华,苏奕成,等.2015年广西14市餐饮企业自制月饼卫生质量监测结果分析[J],应用预防医学,2017,23(6):496-497.
[2]FAO/WHO.FAO food and nutrition paper 70:the application of risk communication to food standards and safety matters,report of a joint fao/who expert consultation[EB/OL].(1998-02-06)[2018-1-15].http://www.fao.org.docrep/005.x127le00.htm.
[3]FAO/WHO.FAO food and nutrition paper 87:food safety risk analysis,a guide for national food safety authorities[EB/OL].(2006-11-01)[2018-1-15].ftp://fao.org.docrep/fao/009/a0822e/a0822e.pdf.
[4]卫生部办公厅关于印发国家食品安全风险监测结果会商机制的函[Z].2012.6.
[5]广西壮族自治区食品安全委员会办公室关于印发广西壮族自治区食品安全风险会商联席会议制度的通知[Z].2015.11
[6]杜晓曦.落实监督抽检,加强风险交流预警[J].中国食品药品监管,2017(10):35.
[7]韦波.完善基层治理体系,推动“四有两责”落地生根[J].中国食品药品监管,2016(1):19.
[8]韦波.广西推进基层食品药品安全工作的实践与思考[J].当代广西,2015(19):52.
[9]陈绍民.建立风险防控体系,构筑牢固安全防线——食品药品安全风险会商制度的实践与思考[J].中国食品药品监管,2013(4):4-5.
[10]石萌萌,蒋玉艳,谢艺红,等.2016年广西食源性疾病暴发事件流行病学特征分析[J],应用预防医学,2017,23(6):465-468.
[11]刘银品,刘展华,苏奕成,等.2015年广西14市餐饮企业自制月饼卫生质量监测结果分析[J],应用预防医学,2017,23(6):496-497.