铁路驼峰调车场尾部停车防溜分析及停车器布置仿真研究
|
摘要
驼峰是铁路编组站内重要的车辆改编设备,也是技术最密集布置的区域,提高驼峰溜放效率对于实现编组站作业能力的提升具有显著作用,提高驼峰作业安全性对于保障编组站运输畅通具有重要意义。利用计算机模拟手段,分别在到发线有效长850 m和1 050 m的2种情况下,对不同停车器间隔进行停车防溜仿真实验。通过对实验结果的分析,得出驼峰调车场尾部停车器间隔变化不仅会影响停车防溜效果,并且对停车防溜效果影响的规律会受到尾部坡度和单组勾车辆数的制约,进而为停车防溜设备布置方案的优化提供依据。
Humps with higher efficiency will remarkably improve railway marshalling stations' operation capacity while humps with greater security will ensure their smooth operation, because the fact that humps are important technology-intensive marshalling equipment. This paper carries out simulation experiments on the anti-running stopping-devices with different intervals for two effective lengths of arrival and departure tracks: 850 m and 1 050 m by means of computer simulation. Based on an analysis of the findings, the paper concludes that different intervals between stopping-devices will produce different antirunning results while the causal relation between the intervals and anti-running effects is influenced by the tail gradient and the number of the train trailers within one unit. The research is expected to provide some supporting evidence for the optimized layouts of anti-running stopping devices.
Humps with higher efficiency will remarkably improve railway marshalling stations' operation capacity while humps with greater security will ensure their smooth operation, because the fact that humps are important technology-intensive marshalling equipment. This paper carries out simulation experiments on the anti-running stopping-devices with different intervals for two effective lengths of arrival and departure tracks: 850 m and 1 050 m by means of computer simulation. Based on an analysis of the findings, the paper concludes that different intervals between stopping-devices will produce different antirunning results while the causal relation between the intervals and anti-running effects is influenced by the tail gradient and the number of the train trailers within one unit. The research is expected to provide some supporting evidence for the optimized layouts of anti-running stopping devices.
引文
[1]中华人民共和国铁道部.?铁路驼峰及调车场设计规范:TB10062—1999[S].?北京:中国铁道出版社,1999,34-36.?
[2]中华人民共和国铁道部.?铁路车站及枢纽设计规范:GB50091—2006[S].?北京:中国计划出版社,2006,38-42.?
[3]保鲁昆,陈伟杰,赵庆宇,等.?铁路驼峰调车场尾部坡度与停车器布置防溜效果仿真研究[J].?铁道运输与经济,2017,39(7):35-41.?BAO Lu-kun,CHEN Wei-jie,ZHAO Qing-yu,et al.?Simulation Study of Shunting Yard Tail Anti-slip Effect based on Different Stop Device Layout and Tail Slop[J].?Railway Transport and Economy,2017,39(7):35-41.?
[4]李莉.?编组场尾部停车防溜系统的调研及解决方案[J].?减速顶与调速技术,2012(2):4-5.?LI Li.?The Solution about the System of Avoid Slid at the Tail of Marshaling Yard[J].?Retarders and Speed Control Technology,2012(2):4-5.?
[5]张艺,卫红军.?调车场尾部车辆防溜作业存在问题的探讨[J].?减速顶与调速技术,2012(2):15-17.?ZHANG Yi,WEI Hong-jun.?Discussion on the Problem of Vehicle Anti-slip Operating at the Tail of Marshaling Yard[J].?Retarders and Speed Control Technology,2012(2):15-17.?
[6]门健,陈佳怡.?驼峰编组场尾部自动防溜系统的探讨[J].?减速顶与调速技术,2013(3):9-14.?MEN Jian,CHEN Jia-yi.?Discussion on Automatic Protection Slip System of Hump Marshaling Yard Tail[J].?Retarders and Speed Control Technology,2013(3):9-14.?
[7]徐伟.?铁路车辆防溜作业现状分析及对策研究[J].?铁道运输与经济,2018,40(6):74-77.?XU Wei.?Analysis and Countermeasures of the Wheel Slide Protection Measures[J].?Railway Transport and Economy,2018,40(6):74-77.?
[8]保鲁昆,邹正丰,解立群,等.?编组站调车场尾部防溜效果评估仿真研究[J].?铁道货运,2017,35(10):40-45.?BAO Lu-kun,ZOU Zheng-feng,XIE Li-qun,et al.?Simulation Study of Anti-slip Performance of the Tail of Marshalling Station[J].?Railway Freight Transport,2017,35(10):40-45.?
[9]袁敦磊,保鲁昆,陈福恩.?驼峰调车场尾部停车器布置方案研究仿真[J].?铁道货运,2018,36(2):51-55.?YUAN Dun-lei,BAO Lu-kun,CHEN Fu-en.?Simulation Study of Stop Device Layout Scheme at Tail of Hump Shunting Yard[J].?Railway Freight Transport,2018,36(2):51-55.
[2]中华人民共和国铁道部.?铁路车站及枢纽设计规范:GB50091—2006[S].?北京:中国计划出版社,2006,38-42.?
[3]保鲁昆,陈伟杰,赵庆宇,等.?铁路驼峰调车场尾部坡度与停车器布置防溜效果仿真研究[J].?铁道运输与经济,2017,39(7):35-41.?BAO Lu-kun,CHEN Wei-jie,ZHAO Qing-yu,et al.?Simulation Study of Shunting Yard Tail Anti-slip Effect based on Different Stop Device Layout and Tail Slop[J].?Railway Transport and Economy,2017,39(7):35-41.?
[4]李莉.?编组场尾部停车防溜系统的调研及解决方案[J].?减速顶与调速技术,2012(2):4-5.?LI Li.?The Solution about the System of Avoid Slid at the Tail of Marshaling Yard[J].?Retarders and Speed Control Technology,2012(2):4-5.?
[5]张艺,卫红军.?调车场尾部车辆防溜作业存在问题的探讨[J].?减速顶与调速技术,2012(2):15-17.?ZHANG Yi,WEI Hong-jun.?Discussion on the Problem of Vehicle Anti-slip Operating at the Tail of Marshaling Yard[J].?Retarders and Speed Control Technology,2012(2):15-17.?
[6]门健,陈佳怡.?驼峰编组场尾部自动防溜系统的探讨[J].?减速顶与调速技术,2013(3):9-14.?MEN Jian,CHEN Jia-yi.?Discussion on Automatic Protection Slip System of Hump Marshaling Yard Tail[J].?Retarders and Speed Control Technology,2013(3):9-14.?
[7]徐伟.?铁路车辆防溜作业现状分析及对策研究[J].?铁道运输与经济,2018,40(6):74-77.?XU Wei.?Analysis and Countermeasures of the Wheel Slide Protection Measures[J].?Railway Transport and Economy,2018,40(6):74-77.?
[8]保鲁昆,邹正丰,解立群,等.?编组站调车场尾部防溜效果评估仿真研究[J].?铁道货运,2017,35(10):40-45.?BAO Lu-kun,ZOU Zheng-feng,XIE Li-qun,et al.?Simulation Study of Anti-slip Performance of the Tail of Marshalling Station[J].?Railway Freight Transport,2017,35(10):40-45.?
[9]袁敦磊,保鲁昆,陈福恩.?驼峰调车场尾部停车器布置方案研究仿真[J].?铁道货运,2018,36(2):51-55.?YUAN Dun-lei,BAO Lu-kun,CHEN Fu-en.?Simulation Study of Stop Device Layout Scheme at Tail of Hump Shunting Yard[J].?Railway Freight Transport,2018,36(2):51-55.