汉语普通话言语测听词表在方言人群中的应用研究
|
摘要
目的:获取湖南地区4~7岁听力正常儿童普通话词汇相邻性测试词表的言语识别率,与普通话词汇相邻性词表言语识别率进行对比,建立湖南方言地区听力正常儿童的言语识别率修正值;并进行两次测试的复测信度研究。方法:以普通话词汇相邻性测试词表为测试材料,测试湖南各地区4~7岁不同年龄组的言语识别率,0.5个月后进行完全相同的第2次测试,横向比较各年龄组的言语识别率并建立修正值,纵向比较同一组两次测试间的言语识别率,获得本词表应用于方言地区的复测信度。结果:与普通话儿童词汇相邻性测试结果相比,湖南方言儿童各年龄组的言语识别率差异无统计学意义,同一年龄组双音节词得分高于单音节词,易词得分高于难词(P<0.05)。在初测复测两轮测试中4~4.9岁组数据结果的相关系数分别为0.89、0.83、0.92、0.69、0.79、0.70、0.81、0.75、0.82、0.80、0.81和0.83(P<0.05);5~5.9岁组数据结果的相关系数分别为0.90、0.76、0.94、0.73、0.83、0.85、0.89、0.77、0.88、0.85、0.94和0.78(P<0.05);6~6.9岁组数据结果的相关系数分别为0.78、0.93、0.76、0.68、0.90、0.88、0.81、0.80、0.82、0.80、0.87和0.86(P<0.05)。结论:普通话词汇相邻性测试词表可应用于湖南方言儿童,词表的词汇学因素对识别率的影响同样适用于湖南方言儿童。
Objective:To obtain verbal recognition rate of the test vocabulary of mandarin vocabulary adjacency among 4~7 years old children with hearing in Hunan,compared with speech recognition rate of mandarin adjacency vocabulary.To establish a revised speech recognition rate for hearing-impaired children in the Hunan dialect area and to carry out two test test-retest reliability studies.Methods:Using mandarin vocabulary adjacency test vocabulary as test material to test verbal recognition rates of different age groups aged 4~7 years in Hunan and a half month later we tested the same for the second time,laterally compare the speech recognition rate of each age group to establish a correction value.The speech recognition rate between groups was compared longitudinally.The thesaurus should be applied to the retest reliability of dialect area.Results:Compared with the test results of children's vocabulary adjacency in mandarin,there was no significant difference in speech recognition rate among children of different age groups in Hunan dialect children.The scores of two-syllable words in the same age group were higher than those of monosyllable words,and the score of easy words was higher than that of difficult words(P<0.05).The correlation coefficients of the results of the 4~4.9-year-old group data in the first test and two test rounds were 0.89,0.83,0.92,0.69,0.79,0.70,0.81,0.75,0.82,0.80,0.81 and 0.83 respectively(P<0.05).The correlation coefficients of the 5~5.9-year-old group data results were 0.90,0.76,0.94,0.73,0.83,0.85,0.89,0.77,0.88,0.85,0.94 and 0.78 respectively(P<0.05).The correlation coefficients for the data for the 6~6.9-year-old group were 0.78,0.93,0.76,0.68,0.90,0.88,0.81,0.80,0.82,0.80,0.87 and 0.86 respectively(P<0.05).Conclusion:Mandarin vocabulary adjacency test vocabulary can be applied to Hunan dialect children.The effect of lexical factors on the recognition rate of the vocabulary also applies to Hunan dialect children.
Objective:To obtain verbal recognition rate of the test vocabulary of mandarin vocabulary adjacency among 4~7 years old children with hearing in Hunan,compared with speech recognition rate of mandarin adjacency vocabulary.To establish a revised speech recognition rate for hearing-impaired children in the Hunan dialect area and to carry out two test test-retest reliability studies.Methods:Using mandarin vocabulary adjacency test vocabulary as test material to test verbal recognition rates of different age groups aged 4~7 years in Hunan and a half month later we tested the same for the second time,laterally compare the speech recognition rate of each age group to establish a correction value.The speech recognition rate between groups was compared longitudinally.The thesaurus should be applied to the retest reliability of dialect area.Results:Compared with the test results of children's vocabulary adjacency in mandarin,there was no significant difference in speech recognition rate among children of different age groups in Hunan dialect children.The scores of two-syllable words in the same age group were higher than those of monosyllable words,and the score of easy words was higher than that of difficult words(P<0.05).The correlation coefficients of the results of the 4~4.9-year-old group data in the first test and two test rounds were 0.89,0.83,0.92,0.69,0.79,0.70,0.81,0.75,0.82,0.80,0.81 and 0.83 respectively(P<0.05).The correlation coefficients of the 5~5.9-year-old group data results were 0.90,0.76,0.94,0.73,0.83,0.85,0.89,0.77,0.88,0.85,0.94 and 0.78 respectively(P<0.05).The correlation coefficients for the data for the 6~6.9-year-old group were 0.78,0.93,0.76,0.68,0.90,0.88,0.81,0.80,0.82,0.80,0.87 and 0.86 respectively(P<0.05).Conclusion:Mandarin vocabulary adjacency test vocabulary can be applied to Hunan dialect children.The effect of lexical factors on the recognition rate of the vocabulary also applies to Hunan dialect children.
引文
[1]张宁,刘莎,盛玉麒,等.普通话儿童词汇相邻性多音节词表编制研究[J].中华耳科学杂志,2008,6(1):30-34.
[2]张宁,刘莎,盛玉麒,等.普通话儿童词汇相邻性单音节词表的编制[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2009,17(4):313-317.
[3]刘莎,韩德民,张宁,等.汉语普通话学龄前儿童日常口语词库的建立[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2008,16(2):121.
[4]卜行宽,莫玲燕,黄丽辉,等.2004年国际新生儿听力筛查诊断和干预会议侧记[J].中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2004,39(11):702-704.
[5]Geers AE.Factors Influencing Spoken Language Outcomes in Children following Early Cochlear Implantation[J].Adv Otorhinolaryngol,2006,64:50-65.
[6]周慧群,殷善开.耳蜗植入术后儿童听觉及语言发育的研究现状[J].实用医院临床杂志,2010,7(5):1-5.
[7]王素菊,孔颖,刘莎,等.普通话儿童词汇相邻性测试词表总体信度评估[J].首都医科大学学报,2011,(32):721-728.
[8]李淑静,刘海红,刘莎,等.普通话词汇相邻性词表在人工耳蜗植入儿童中的等价性验证[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2013,21(3):217-220.
[9]Kirk KI,Mellon NK,Robbins AM,et al.Cochlear Implants Principles&Practices[J].Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams&Wilkins,2000,(13):25-259.
[10]Yuen KCP,Ng IHY,Luk BPK,et al.The development of Cantonese Lexical Neighborhood Test-A pilot study[J].International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology,2008,72(7):1121-1129.
[11]Wang NM,Wu CM,Kirk KI.Lexical effects on spoken word recognition performance among Mandarin-speaking children with normal hearing and cochlear implants[J].International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology,2010,74(8):883-890.
[12]司玉英.普通话儿童语音习得的个案研究[J].当代语言学,2006,(1):1-16.
[13]Wu JL,Lin CY,Yang HM,et al.Effect of age at cochlear implantation on open-set word recognition in Mandarin speaking deaf children[J].International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology,2006,70(2):207-211.
[14]Luce PA,Pisoni DB.Recognizing spoken words:the neighborhood activation model[J].Ear Hear,1998,19(1):1-36.
[15]郗昕.当前中文言语测听的几个误区[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2012,20(6):509-511.
[16]孙振球.医学统计学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:485-495.
[2]张宁,刘莎,盛玉麒,等.普通话儿童词汇相邻性单音节词表的编制[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2009,17(4):313-317.
[3]刘莎,韩德民,张宁,等.汉语普通话学龄前儿童日常口语词库的建立[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2008,16(2):121.
[4]卜行宽,莫玲燕,黄丽辉,等.2004年国际新生儿听力筛查诊断和干预会议侧记[J].中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2004,39(11):702-704.
[5]Geers AE.Factors Influencing Spoken Language Outcomes in Children following Early Cochlear Implantation[J].Adv Otorhinolaryngol,2006,64:50-65.
[6]周慧群,殷善开.耳蜗植入术后儿童听觉及语言发育的研究现状[J].实用医院临床杂志,2010,7(5):1-5.
[7]王素菊,孔颖,刘莎,等.普通话儿童词汇相邻性测试词表总体信度评估[J].首都医科大学学报,2011,(32):721-728.
[8]李淑静,刘海红,刘莎,等.普通话词汇相邻性词表在人工耳蜗植入儿童中的等价性验证[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2013,21(3):217-220.
[9]Kirk KI,Mellon NK,Robbins AM,et al.Cochlear Implants Principles&Practices[J].Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams&Wilkins,2000,(13):25-259.
[10]Yuen KCP,Ng IHY,Luk BPK,et al.The development of Cantonese Lexical Neighborhood Test-A pilot study[J].International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology,2008,72(7):1121-1129.
[11]Wang NM,Wu CM,Kirk KI.Lexical effects on spoken word recognition performance among Mandarin-speaking children with normal hearing and cochlear implants[J].International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology,2010,74(8):883-890.
[12]司玉英.普通话儿童语音习得的个案研究[J].当代语言学,2006,(1):1-16.
[13]Wu JL,Lin CY,Yang HM,et al.Effect of age at cochlear implantation on open-set word recognition in Mandarin speaking deaf children[J].International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology,2006,70(2):207-211.
[14]Luce PA,Pisoni DB.Recognizing spoken words:the neighborhood activation model[J].Ear Hear,1998,19(1):1-36.
[15]郗昕.当前中文言语测听的几个误区[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2012,20(6):509-511.
[16]孙振球.医学统计学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:485-495.