海事英语一词多义的认知理据
|
摘要
为更好地理解和掌握海事英语中的多义词,根据认知语言学的原型理论、隐喻和转喻理论和意象图式理论,对海事英语的一词多义现象的形成机制展开分析和阐释,得出结论:海事英语的一次多义现象是有充分的认知理据的,通过人的认知模式来学习多义词可以使词汇学习更加形象化和系统化。
In order to better understand and master the polysemous words in maritime English,the formation mechanism of polysemy phenomenon in maritime English is analyzed and illustrated according to the cognitive theories of prototype,metaphor and metonymy,and image schema. It is concluded that the polysemy phenomenon in maritime English has sufficient cognitive motivation,and learning polysemous words through human cognitive mode can make vocabulary learning more visualized and systematized.
In order to better understand and master the polysemous words in maritime English,the formation mechanism of polysemy phenomenon in maritime English is analyzed and illustrated according to the cognitive theories of prototype,metaphor and metonymy,and image schema. It is concluded that the polysemy phenomenon in maritime English has sufficient cognitive motivation,and learning polysemous words through human cognitive mode can make vocabulary learning more visualized and systematized.
引文
[1] ULMANN S. Words and their use[M]. London:Frederick Muller Ltd,1951:49.
[2] JOHNSON M. The body in the mind:the bodily basis of meaning,imagination and reason[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1987.
[3]束定芳.现代语义学[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2000:7-85.
[4]李艳.英语一词多义现象的认知解读[J].湖南人文科技学院学报,2014(1):78-81.
[5]张晓峰.英汉海事术语的明喻与隐喻方式[J].上海海事大学学报,2016,37(2):94-97. DOI:10. 13340/j. jsmu. 2016. 02. 017.
[6]张洋.浅析航海英语中的隐喻[J].牡丹江大学学报,2013,22(4):83-84. DOI:10. 15907/j. cnki. 23-1450. 2013. 04. 033.
[7]沈江,丁自华,姜朝妍.航海英语[M].大连:大连海事大学出版社,2016:1-356.
[8]张晓峰,吴卫兵,岳兴旺.航海英语听力与会话[M].大连:大连海事大学出版社,2012.
[9] ROSCH E,MERVIS B C. Family resemblance:studies in the internal structure of categories[J]. Cognitive Psychology,1975(4):573-605.
[10] LAKOFF G. Women,fire and dangerous things:what categories reveal about the mind[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1987:5-8.
[11] LAKOFF G,JOHNSON M. Metaphors we live by[M]. London:Edward Arnold,1980:4-121.
[12] GIBBS R W,Jr. Speaking and thinking with metonymy[C]//Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing,1999:61-76.
[13]江晓红.转喻的认知语用研究[D].广州:广东外语外贸大学,2008.
[14] LANGACKER W. Foundations of cognitive grammar[M]. California:Stanford University Press,1987.
[2] JOHNSON M. The body in the mind:the bodily basis of meaning,imagination and reason[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1987.
[3]束定芳.现代语义学[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2000:7-85.
[4]李艳.英语一词多义现象的认知解读[J].湖南人文科技学院学报,2014(1):78-81.
[5]张晓峰.英汉海事术语的明喻与隐喻方式[J].上海海事大学学报,2016,37(2):94-97. DOI:10. 13340/j. jsmu. 2016. 02. 017.
[6]张洋.浅析航海英语中的隐喻[J].牡丹江大学学报,2013,22(4):83-84. DOI:10. 15907/j. cnki. 23-1450. 2013. 04. 033.
[7]沈江,丁自华,姜朝妍.航海英语[M].大连:大连海事大学出版社,2016:1-356.
[8]张晓峰,吴卫兵,岳兴旺.航海英语听力与会话[M].大连:大连海事大学出版社,2012.
[9] ROSCH E,MERVIS B C. Family resemblance:studies in the internal structure of categories[J]. Cognitive Psychology,1975(4):573-605.
[10] LAKOFF G. Women,fire and dangerous things:what categories reveal about the mind[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1987:5-8.
[11] LAKOFF G,JOHNSON M. Metaphors we live by[M]. London:Edward Arnold,1980:4-121.
[12] GIBBS R W,Jr. Speaking and thinking with metonymy[C]//Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing,1999:61-76.
[13]江晓红.转喻的认知语用研究[D].广州:广东外语外贸大学,2008.
[14] LANGACKER W. Foundations of cognitive grammar[M]. California:Stanford University Press,1987.