摘要
作为逻辑思维的认知能力,"理性"原本只是在认知领域才具有目的性的价值,而在非认知领域仅仅具有工具性的价值。但西方主流哲学在"实践理性"精神的主导下,却将这类工具性的价值神化为目的性的价值,结果陷入了一个长达两千多年的深度悖论,并且在理论和实践中造成了一系列扭曲和误导。
As the cognitive faculty of logical thinking,"reason"itself has the goal- values only in the cognitive field and the merely instrumental values in non- cognitive fields. Under the guidance of its spirit of "practical reason",however,the mainstream of Western philosophy has deified these instrumental values as the goal- values for the whole human life and then fallen into some in- depth paradox,with many results of distortion and misleading both in theory and in practice.
引文
[1]简明不列颠百科全书(第5卷)[Z].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1986.
[2]韦伯.经济与社会(上卷)[M].林荣远译,北京:商务印书馆,1998.
[3]色诺芬.回忆苏格拉底[M].吴永泉译,北京:商务印书馆,1984.
[4]柏拉图.柏拉图全集(第1卷)[M].王晓朝译,北京:人民出版社,2002.
[5]亚里士多德.形而上学[M].吴寿彭译,北京:商务印书馆,1959.
[6]亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学[M].廖申白译注,北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[7]霍布斯.利维坦[M].黎思复等译,北京:商务印书馆,1985.
[8]休谟.人性论[M].关文运译,北京:商务印书馆,1980.
[9]康德.纯粹理性批判[M].邓晓芒译,北京:人民出版社,2004.
[10]康德.实践理性批判[M].邓晓芒译,北京:人民出版社,2003.
[11]康德.道德形而上学原理[M].苗力田译,上海:上海人民出版社,2002.
[12]罗尔斯.政治自由主义[M].万俊人译,南京:译林出版社,2000.