240 g/L噻呋酰胺悬浮剂不同施用方式对花生白绢病防效及产量的影响
|
摘要
[目的]评价240 g/L噻呋酰胺悬浮剂拌种和喷淋茎基部对花生白绢病的防治效果。[方法]通过不同用量(150、300、450 m L/hm2)240 g/L噻呋酰胺悬浮剂拌种和喷淋茎基部的方法,研究其对花生白绢病的防治效果及对花生产量的影响。[结果]240 g/L噻呋酰胺悬浮剂不同浓度拌种和喷淋对花生白绢病防效和花生产量的影响,均以450 m L/hm2喷淋花生茎基部处理对花生白绢病的防治效果和增产效果最好,且喷淋处理的防效和增产率明显高于拌种处理。[结论]该研究结果为花生白绢病的有效防控提供了理论依据。
[Objective] The aim was to evaluate the control efficiency of peanut seed dressing and spraying stem by 240 g/L thifluzamide suspending agent on peanut southern blight. [Method] Through peanut seed dressing and spraying stem by different dosages( 150,300 and450 m L/hm2) of 240 g/L thifluzamide suspending agent,its control efficiency on peanut southern blight as well as effect on peanut yield were studied.[Result] The control efficiency on peanut southern blight as well as effect on peanut yield of 240 g/L thifluzamide suspending agent with450 m L/hm2 treatment by spraying stem had the best control effect and yield increase rate. Meanwhile,the control efficiency and yield increase rate of spraying stem was significantly higher than that of seed dressing treatment.[Conclusion]The research result provides theoretical basis for the control of peanut southern blight.
[Objective] The aim was to evaluate the control efficiency of peanut seed dressing and spraying stem by 240 g/L thifluzamide suspending agent on peanut southern blight. [Method] Through peanut seed dressing and spraying stem by different dosages( 150,300 and450 m L/hm2) of 240 g/L thifluzamide suspending agent,its control efficiency on peanut southern blight as well as effect on peanut yield were studied.[Result] The control efficiency on peanut southern blight as well as effect on peanut yield of 240 g/L thifluzamide suspending agent with450 m L/hm2 treatment by spraying stem had the best control effect and yield increase rate. Meanwhile,the control efficiency and yield increase rate of spraying stem was significantly higher than that of seed dressing treatment.[Conclusion]The research result provides theoretical basis for the control of peanut southern blight.
引文
[1]徐秀娟,鄢洪海,迟玉成,等.中国花生病虫草鼠害[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2009.
[2]Chi Y C,Xu M L,Yang J G,et al.First report of Rhizoctonia solani causing peanut pod rot in China[J].Plant disease,2016,100(5):1008.
[3]Xu M L,Xie H F,Wu J X,et al.Translation initiation factor e IF4E and e I-Fiso4E are both required for peanut stripe virus infection in peanut(Arachis hypogaea L.)[J].Frontiers in microbiology,2017[2018-01-11].https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00338/full.https//www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00338/full.doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00338.
[4]董炜博,石延茂,孙爱香,等.花生白绢病的温室接种技术及抗性鉴定[J].花生学报,2001,30(3):17-20.
[5]晏立英,宋万朵,张芳,等.花生白绢病温室接种技术的建立和苗期抗病性鉴定[J].中国油料作物学报,2017,39(5):682-692.
[6]陆燕,李澄,陈志德,等.解淀粉芽孢杆菌41B-1对花生白绢病的生防效果[J].中国油料作物学报,2016,38(4):487-494.
[7]谢瑾卉,朱茂山.9种杀菌剂对花生白绢病菌的室内毒力测定[J].辽宁农业科学,2015(3):70-72.
[8]谢吉先,丁国祥,何建国,等.240 g/L噻呋酰胺悬浮剂对花生白绢病的防效[J].安徽农业科学,2015,43(24):95-96.
[9]赵婷婷,焦庆清,蒋莹,等.240 g/L噻呋酰胺悬浮剂拌种对花生病害的防效及对花生产量的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2016,44(27):148-150.
[2]Chi Y C,Xu M L,Yang J G,et al.First report of Rhizoctonia solani causing peanut pod rot in China[J].Plant disease,2016,100(5):1008.
[3]Xu M L,Xie H F,Wu J X,et al.Translation initiation factor e IF4E and e I-Fiso4E are both required for peanut stripe virus infection in peanut(Arachis hypogaea L.)[J].Frontiers in microbiology,2017[2018-01-11].https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00338/full.https//www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00338/full.doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00338.
[4]董炜博,石延茂,孙爱香,等.花生白绢病的温室接种技术及抗性鉴定[J].花生学报,2001,30(3):17-20.
[5]晏立英,宋万朵,张芳,等.花生白绢病温室接种技术的建立和苗期抗病性鉴定[J].中国油料作物学报,2017,39(5):682-692.
[6]陆燕,李澄,陈志德,等.解淀粉芽孢杆菌41B-1对花生白绢病的生防效果[J].中国油料作物学报,2016,38(4):487-494.
[7]谢瑾卉,朱茂山.9种杀菌剂对花生白绢病菌的室内毒力测定[J].辽宁农业科学,2015(3):70-72.
[8]谢吉先,丁国祥,何建国,等.240 g/L噻呋酰胺悬浮剂对花生白绢病的防效[J].安徽农业科学,2015,43(24):95-96.
[9]赵婷婷,焦庆清,蒋莹,等.240 g/L噻呋酰胺悬浮剂拌种对花生病害的防效及对花生产量的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2016,44(27):148-150.